Ty Harper

Ebrahim, thanks for your thoughts/suggestions. I've looked at the GH4, and so far what I've seen, look-wise, has not won me over. As for your other suggestions, I kind of figured sharpness would not be a key deciding factor when thinking about how well a 5D Mark II could match - look-wise, overall - against an A7s, GH4 (etc). Of course simply going for a Mark III would make the most immediately practical sense, given my outlined criteria, but working with its RAW files (when the need to up my quality arises in the future) would be cumbersome and comparatively limiting, it seems. The A7s is what I'm more gravitating towards, but having to rely so heavily on my ability to properly color correct and grade + match camera looks, this early in my understanding of that discipline seems a bit much right now, especially for efficient turnaround times.

Hey all :-) Looking to upgrade to a new camera. I'm not one to chase what's hot, new and trendy. In fact, I still use a 5D Mark II/7D combo as my A/B Cam (respectively). So based on my situation, if you were looking to pick up one new camera - primarily for short doc use - and wanted to keep at least the 5D Mark II in the mix as a B-Cam, what newer camera would you pick up right now? The GH4? A7s? 5D Mark III? Other suggestions? My main concerns are: being able to match the new camera's look with the 5D Mark II, overall work flow (like many, I'm a one-man band), the long-term value of any new camera I invest in, and the degree of 4K future-proofing I can attain with this purchase. I'm a newbie when it comes to color correction and grading, but my aim is to get better at it as I go along. Additionally, all my lenses (100mm Macro IS f/2.8 L, 80-200mm f/2.8 L, 24-105mm IS f/4 L, Rokinon 35mm 1.4, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8) are Canon mounts. Any thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated!