BrorSvensson

The 24-70 is tested to perform similary to the canon 24-70. Here is that lens on the 24mp canon vs the cheapest apsc on the same camera. I think you the a6000 with 16-70 and a6300 with 24-70 GM would give similar results.

but the 24-70 2.8 is designed for a much bigger sensor than the a6300 (full frame) so you wont be taking advantage of the enitre lens and get all the sharpness while the 16-70mm is made for apsc.

ah thats a bummer, but like you said not a unsolvable problem. How's the 60p on the camera? Any better than the a6000?

Is there a headphone jack on the a6300?

maybe something thats fixable with firmware from metabones.

looks stuningly good for a 100mbit codec!

I was in the same situation, sold my 7d because 60p is needed for my workflow. The blackmagic micro cinema is a very exicting product imo, only thing holding me back is the 600$ price of the bmpcc speedbooster which seems like a necesary if you want to get some sort of shallow dof.

The only canon camera before the 80d that was able to do 1080p 60fps was the 7d mark ii. i think they had trouble cracking it and it was to much trouble to be worth it. Very true but im not gonna lie, the 5d mark iii raw is stil my favorite digital image out there under 15k.

In the once you are listing with a atomos assasin, is the atomos there to record clean HDMI 1080 60fps? If so then the Blackmagic video assist is a much cheaper option.

wow thats amazing, it was a nex 7 with lens turbo and nikkor 50mm 1.4.

Edit: Image quiality got ruined in the images below so here are some higher res ones. http://imgur.com/a/f509f

Try out the VSCO presets if you haven't already.

youtube 4k footage on 1080p = moire on all cameras. watching the 1080p on a 1080p will be alot less moire.

resolution and sharpness of a lens is two very things different to me. Shooting 4k with a soft-ish lens will looks really smooth and not blochy. There will be lots of detail in the image but it may not be super sharp.

Sony A7 with the neutral picture style -3-3-3 and graded with film convert.

i have the ais version, all the shots except the close ups in this video was shot on the nikkor.

i had it and sold it after a couple of days of usage, my nikkor 35m f2 which retails for 80$ is a lot sharper wide open. I dont think i still have the footage but i can check tomorrow. But here's a review which covers mot areas about it http://www.lenstip.com/428.1-Lens_review-Mitakon_Creator_35_mm_f_2_-Introduction.html

mitakon 35mm f2 is worse than canon fd 35mm f2 and nikkor 35mm f2 so not recommended.

sammy 35mm 1.4 is amazing, if you wanna go with the route off a very clinical lens then its your best bet. If you want someone with lower contrast more vintage look, the canon ltm 35mm f1.8 is a real beaut. Kinda rare but it comes up every once in awhile on ebay.

samyang lenses in general are beautiful on the nx1

Awesome tests and comparisions Mattias! It seems that it is the product i've been waiting for a long time,

definitly not soft, but its nothing amazing.

Low light looks stunning, seems to be up par to a7rii super 35mm

i know you didn't ask me but iam also a sony shooter and i've found shooting at -1 magenta and +2 to orange makes the image very apealing and nice to work with.

can't see a reason for it not to