BrorSvensson

One of my friend has one, at f2 its nothing to boost about. I would personally get the Nikon ai 35mm f2 instead.

Looks to be very compact

oh ok, kinda like pentax 645z?

will x0.7 give the proper medium format focal length? Feels like its not enough magnification.

I bought an x100 for 250 on ebay, you just gotta look around and be patient.

Yeah not everyone will needs/wants such a lens, the price indicates that its a speciality lens for a niche group of people. But im sure those people who can see its potential will love it.

is the canon 85mm 1.2 pointless then also? so many wedding photographers rely on that lens at f1.2, its a specific style.

May i ask why its pointless? its the longest f1.4 dslr lens, it will be amazing for portraits.

am i the only one who cant stand the look of like 16mm equiv lenses, it just looks wierd.

http://lovesvensson.portfoliobox.net/ you can check my site, it hasn't been updated for a while but still some decent photos. All photos with A7 and manual Nikkor Ai lenses.

you will love the sony a7 then

gx85 vs the full frame sensor makes a big difference with stills which OP said he would take.

its a nice jump from the 7d, especially if you want slow motion

Freestyle scootering is a relative new sport so no shame there Thanks for the compliments! Yeah i think pretty much every camera made after (and) the 5d mark iii is good enough for most people, no needs to think that you need clinicly sharp NX1 4k to make an amazing video. Where the Sony A7 shines is with shallow dof stuff, like the 2016 setup video. It highlightes the awesomeness of the amazing full frame sensor and with the background being blured out you escape all the moire aliasing stuff.

Im probably the only one on this forum that uses a Sony A7 to film videos, if you want to check out some samples you can watch my 5 latest videos https://www.youtube.com/user/4cfingers/videos I really like the camera with the headphone and mic jack, the 1080p 60 is decent and for me personally good enough for youtube. DR with portrait -3 contrast is similar to the 5d with -5 contrast. I shoot 50% stills and 50% and i think its a very versitile camera when using manual lenses, its easy to focus with the beautiful and sharp EVF. The A7r and A7 have nearly identical video performance.

you are looking for the exact same thing as me, i've been trying to find a way to buy another smartphone for the sole purpose of a monitor but i dont know which is the best option right now so im doing the researcg

The classic chrome looks amazing

The image in your video Mattias reminds me very much of the NX1 in a good nice, very sharp detail and very beautiful and neutral colors.

100mbit in 1080p 60fps is a very welcome feature to 60p lovers like me.

Looks really good, i bet it would look even better if used with something wider than that 42mm equiv lens.

No 0 is the default amount of sharpening that sony wants to have on their jpgs/videos, -3 is lowering that number, +3 is making it more. yes -3 is the way to go. 0 - 6 would make more sense.

Lower the sharpness number to -3 isn't softening the image, its removing part of the in camera sharpening. its tried and true tested that adding sharpness in post gives much better results than doing it in camera.

also have an lens with OSS helps

My favorite sony profile is portrait with -3 sharpness -2 saturation and -3 contrast

If you're shooting canon 1080p it wont be a problem.