Beritar

I remember Andrew and a german site said DCI 4K was slighlty softer than UHD on the NX1 (and GH5) because the size of the sensor used on DCI 4K was a bit smaller than UHD. However, the rolling shutter must be a tiny bit better on the DCI 4K, again because of the size of the sensor used with DCI 4K.

Great pictures, Pana Leica 50-200mm ?

I used the A7SIII, the S5 and the S1. I returned the SIII because of the noise reduction, colors, IBIS, MP and sharpness. I don't need the 120fps 4K 1.1x and the fast AF-C. My S1 and S5 with the S Pro 2.8 have very fast AF and good enough AF-C. And even if Sony has more lenses I prefer the Lumix ones. I had/have the 24-70mm GM, 70-200mm GM and 50mm Zeiss Sony 1.4, the Lumix Pro equivalent lenses are better (sharpness, bokeh and 3D pop). About the S5, it's a great camera, but the S1 is even better (slightly better IBIS, better EVF, 6K internal next year etc ...) !

I agree, I had the A7III and noise reduction was very strong. I tried the A7SIII one month ago and even if the image is cleaner, there is still a lot of noise reduction. My S5 and S1 keep more details (although noisier).

I love the S5 as well. Coming from Sony FF , it's nice to have good IBIS and to get ride of the ugly noise reduction at high ISO. And the 50mm PRO is the best 50mm lens I have ever owned (even better than Sony Zeiss Planar).

There is advantages and disadvantages on both cameras (the S5 will get the 5.9k raw update too), in the end it's about user preference. As an hybrid shooter, I much prefer the S5.

No doubt about the better image, better IBIS too.

Slightly less good dynamic range than S1H and S1. https://www.cined.com/panasonic-lumix-s5-lab-test-rolling-shutter-dynamic-range-and-latitude/

Luckily for Sony, they have some popular Youtubers with biased reviews.

Interesting test about the R5/R6/A7SIII/S5 dynamic range ... https://www.slashcam.de/artikel/Test/Der-Dynamikumfang-von-Canon-EOS-R5---R6--Panasonic-S5-und-Sony-A7SIII-im-Vergleich--Erkenntnisse---Fazit.html#Fazit

Popco review with IBIS test: https://www.popco.net/zboard/view.php?id=dica_review&page=&category=&sn1=&divpage=&sn=&ss=&sc=&select_arrange=&desc=&no=1112&ReviewUrl=1Sec_LUMIXS5_4Kmovie.html

https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=250&t=6186842&fbclid=IwAR1zH-9Ya8JgxYwCBfaDT7T3XJmh6luM6ZJWeWaKAT8bpvmSP6K_PhRM6nc Chinese review

Yes we must wait for Andrew's review.

"IBIS is on part with the Sony A7III" ...

Me too, I really like the dynamic range of these Panasonic FF cameras. About the IBIS, Gerald Undone used a 50mm without walking on his video and the footage looked jerky.

IBIS looks pretty good on this video ... Better than the Gerald Undone's test.

Based on the video, the S5 IBIS is worse than the S1H but seems good enough. The A7III is helpless though ... I would like to see a comparison between the GH5/S5.

Yes I would like to see a comparison between the S5 and the GH5 IBIS.

Certainly not, I have the GH5, the A7III and I had the S1. The GH5 still has the edge for stabilization. Maybe the S1H is better for IBIS, but not the S1. The A7III IBIS is the worst by a large margin.

I was very interested by the S5, not so much now because of the IBIS ...

And the IBIS is worse compared to the S1 ...

I think the S5 has only 5 stop IBIS without dual IS and worse electronic viewfinder compared to the S1. I was ready to buy the S5 but if the IBIS is not as good, I will stay with my GH5 for now ...

If the S5 is really a mini S1 with the same IBIS, I will buy this camera day one.