Jump to content

Marco Tecno

Members
  • Posts

    1,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Marco Tecno

  1. I agree. Since when I bought the 150s, I almost never used my 85, despite it being outstanding. 150s is an incredible lens, IMO unmatched by most systems.
  2. For video, S lenses and powerzoom (for portability). For stills...many others ;-)
  3. Luca, here I have to (respectfully) disagree with you. Such a conversion kit would be of very little (to no) interest to me. As ttbek, I'm 85% a still shooter, who started taking videos since nx1 is so good at it, but for videos, I'm more than served by the (outstanding) s lenses. I need a (not too exoensive) telephoto lens, in the 300mm range (450mm equivalent) for my nx1. I tried metabones on a6300 and indeed this could be the ONLY selling point of that camera to me (but...at that point...I would buy a real canon). It worked very well, even in modest light.
  4. For me such a tool would be of no interest. I'd like real af for stills shooting with tele lenses.
  5. I'm quite sure kinoseed is right on this.
  6. What do you mean with 'nx1 flat profile'?
  7. So the lut should be applied over a file recorded with gamma dr, r 1.04, g 0.93, b1.04 and no other changes? Thx.
  8. So...iris controllable from nx1 body? With the rear wheel like with nx lenses? What about af?
  9. Great Luca, but the question is still the same: is this kind of control available directly from the NX1 body (and hence automated) or is it a sort of manual, tethered control?
  10. I mean that the nx1 does 120fps where nx500 does not (I was replying to mnewxcv)
  11. Unfortunately Vasile seems to be MIA.
  12. And so is your "out of context reply". But I'll bite. I never cared about IBIS, since the DIS is really effective, especially when paired to the OIS in the lenses. For the rest, an intelligent canon to NX adapter is in the work (lurk on the thread). When this is released...I guess you'll buy ten NX1 bodies...or not? As to sony, I'm still waiting for a decent UI, sensor with less RS, h.265, high bitrate, decently priced good lenses, APSC lenses, ....................................... (too long a list)
  13. Laughter is not always amusement. Could be bitter laughter. And this is the case. Even 2 years after the release of 4k cameras with full sensor readout, able to give great iq, less rs and h.265 compression on the fly, at high bitrates, sony can't deliver a chip which is on par. This is sad.
  14. I will never buy a sony, at least not with that ui. And I won't buy a new camera unless it gives h.265 at high bitrate, at 10bit 4:2:2 internal recording with full sensor readout and possibly 4k@60 and 2k@120. AND at least the same quality and speed of nx1 for stills.
  15. Nothing amusing with that. Just...seeing the worshippers of sony finally opening their eyes in front of hard realty.
  16. What's your problem? Where did I mention nx1? Or, perhaps, that camera is so much better than any sony you own that you feel obliged to dream about it in your worst nightmares? ;-)
  17. If an adapter with real af is provided for canon lenses on nx body (ala metabones) I won't feel the need of a system upgrade for...many years to come.
  18. Hehe, owners of a6300 will be happy for this, especially if no fw update gets released for their camera to match the 6500.
  19. Timmy, what are your starting settings?
  20. And what about cropping? If you never need to crop, 12mp could be enough.
  21. Luca, you're reviving the interest for the nx line. Samsung should hire or pay you.
  22. Luca, wow, that's an achievement! How did you do that? External controller or directly from Samsung body??
×
×
  • Create New...