Mattias Burling

In what way does that have anything to do with my post? EDIT: on second thought, don't answer. You probably didn't even read my post and most likely won't read your own. For me workflow is the most important thing. Quality wise I'm all set with most recent cameras. But RED is so far the only camera I've used with a Raw codec that was editable in FCPX. And it had a good quality to size ratio as well as flowing like butter in 4.5K raw on an ooold computer. So if this new thing is their first truly affordable camera. Or it pushes for example a used Scarlett down to my level.. then I'm in.

In my mind it is because of RedCode. I would forgive any lies, look the other way from the mark-ups and I can even live with the stupid geeky names they use. All of it. For affordable RedCode in a body smaller than the R1MX I had.

It must be close to 10 years since it became common knowledge that the CF-module for the RED One MX and the CF-reader was the same thing and consisted of a simple best buy CF-reader in a cool package. And the RED CF-cards where just rebranded from some regular manufacturer. So Ive just assumed that they have kept going with that sort of things. Until another maker can give me something as nice as Red-code I would forgive them n an instance and jump all over an affordable RED camera. Luckily they have always managed to stay just outside what I feel comfortable spending for non work related equipment.

I agree and will not post anymore on this derail. I'll be in the "stutter vs judder thread". (Sorry, I fought the urge )

Ok I'm calling troll now. No way you are this bad at reading even you own posts.. Just be careful, seems to be a very sensitive subject and one must choose the words very carefully. Even when saying that the camera is good

You are just making this up. Read the posts again. I have said more than once that I'm convinced that the P6K can capture cinematic footage. I've got one for you to. Google "global shutter" and thank me later.

Read the posts again when you have calmed down from what ever it was that triggered you. Because you are clearly reading in stuff that isn't there.

By being the only one Ive watched.. thought that went without saying. Great, then you should buy it. The motion, the clarity, the colors and the tones/curves. So does mine. Looks video to me. Exactly, very smartphoneish. Not a fan. Please note: I have NEVER said that the P6K shoots footage that looks videoish and can't produce cinematic footage. All Im saying is that after reading your post about "proof" that the P6K is "more cinematic than the P4K" I was very disappointed after pressing play on that video. But like I said there are most likely much better examples of cinematic footage out there.

Thats the first video Ive ever seen from the P6K and I must say... it looked extremely videoish. Surely there are some really cinematic footage out there that would better illustrate the point you where trying to make.

That's a Sony exclusive so I think Canon will avoid it unless they want a lawsuit.

In case you guys missed it,

Or perhaps looks is subjective... just a wild idea.

Maybe.

My GF finds them cheesy so it wouldn't be for us But let's say she really really did want one, I probably would consider it just so I could remind her of it the next time I bought an expensive camera

It still seems like you haven't fully understood. The Netflix 4K requirement is for productions made by Netflix. I can use whatever I want and if it's good enough they will accept. To this day almost half of all the movies at the Oscars etc are shot on film or HD. And they all go on Netflix. Netflix even still pick up TV shows shot on s16. This has been talked about to death on this forum in the past. So let's get back to the real subject.

Never transcoded or used any Canon software. I just imported and edited. And since it's low compression my old computer had no issues playing it smoothly.

At no loss then.

Sadly that is true. Mr Trump and the easily offended right wingers spread so much fake news that the truth gets lost. Total zombies indeed. Yup, when cameras lol BMD, Ricoh and Sigma are released fake news spread quickly on forums. We have seen it many times here in the past.

Marketing and movie making have one major thing in common which is why I enjoy it so much. It's all about human emotions. At the end of the day it's the only thing that's truly important. Budget, advertising space, cameras, actors, etc.. it's all just small cogs in a machine with one simple purpose. Affect human emotions in order to change a behavior or opinion. That's the reason for my fascination and why I early on jumped from crew to the production office and later Psyops, PR and marketing.

Yup. Even the included Resolve is a BMCC thing from the beginning. And just like the BMCC and BMPC4K had the same body but MFT and EF mount we now get the BMPCC4K and BMPCC6K with the same differentiators. Other than that there is of course the similar the design, touch, dual rec buttons and so on.

Regarding the "pocket", Im still convinced the BMPCC4K was intended to be the BMCCii. They share much more similarities.

The original BMCC with an EF mount was announced at the same time as the patent for the EF mount expired. We will have to wait a few years before the same happens with the RF or Sony E mount. m4/3 has been open from the start.

I guess the difference is that even though no man is free from sinn, the orange dude is a confessed aspring rapist, a criminal and a diagnosed compulsive liar. Which, good or bad policies aside, makes him pretty unfit for the job and there for a more legitimate target. Agreed, even though Im part of the problem. Its just one of those days On topic, The new sensor size and mount is a god send. The BMPCC4K should have had a smaller sensor or EF mount to make it less of a PITA. To bad about the 6K though, since its totally unnecessary imo and the price of it is too rich for my personal usage of it. If it would have had 250fps in HD I would have preordered it instantly.

Sure.. Same thing in the states. Manhattan and New Orleans is exactly the same. People look the same, eat the exakt same food, listen to the exact same music, its the exact same climate, exactly the same dialect.. oh wait..

Marketing as a whole, not just social media