mercer

Ha. 20 pages in and all I find are references to native lenses and that you can change ISO. I assume since the G7 shares its sensor with the GX8, I can search for the GX8's native ISO as well. Either way, I always try and stay below ISO 800 anyway.

Sorry, a little OT, but how do you find out a camera's native ISO... Specifically the G7? Obviously, I have googled it but couldn't find anything.

Did you do b&w in camera or in post? If in post, can you explain the workflow, because it really looks great. Also, what kinda lighting did you use?

According to the rumor, the specs for the camera changed a year or so ago, based on something video related, so I wouldn't be surprised if they implemented some of the ML tricks into their official firmware. It would make the most sense, since a lot of it is already there. If they did come out with official Canon Raw, that would a genius move.

Effing gorgeous... The lenses look okay too...haha. I assume this is with the NX1?

I have some Minolta MD lenses. Some Pentax M, Some Sigma in FD mount. Some Canon FL, a couple Takumar, some vivitar M42, a couple Pentacon m42, Chinon m42, a Contax Zeiss Planar 50mm 1.7, an Olympus om 28mm f2 and 50mm 1.8, a Tokina 24-40 in OM mount and a Tokina RMC 25-50 in PK mount, etc, etc, etc...

Am looking to sell my NX500, so I thought someone on here might be interested in a lightly used NX500 to use toward the hack. I could sell just the body, or for a little more I'll throw in some vintage lenses and adapters... I have a bunch, so if you're interested in the body plus lenses let me know and I will give you a list of the lenses I have. Pictures available upon request.

Hey Jonesy, no worries. Weird though... I was wondering about this earlier today... I have a bunch of questions but not enough time right now, so I just wanted to quickly say congratulations!!! I hope you rake in the bucks. You can guarantee at least 3 bucks from me within the next couple of weeks.

It would be cool if they let you keep it. And then you would probably have enough cameras to start EOSHD Rentals.

He had 3x crop enabled in ML... So 105mm is 315mm.

Quite frankly, Canon runs their camera division much smarter than Sony. Sure it isn't exciting to us, but it's smart business. A small investment in R&D yields years and years of profit. Sony, for instance, must spend butt loads of money on R&D, and updating their production, making their profit margins much smaller. But this is just my assumption.

I would love it if they put out an interchangeable lens xc10 with the EF-M mount. C-mount lenses with 4K log... Sure they have, you are correct, but they have made small, incremental steps toward building a mirrorless system. With Sony's success in that market, it would be stupid of Canon not to try and get some of that market share.

Actually, they are fairly certain the prosumer mirrorless camera will have 4K, yet other tumors state that one of the 3 mirrorless cameras Canon intends to release will be a full frame. http://www.canonrumors.com/prosumer-level-canon-mirrorless-camera-to-have-4k-cr2/

Canon rumors has stated multiple times with fairly high certainty that Canon is releasing a professional full frame mirrorless camera by year's end.

Nope. Not silly at all. What gives you the right to decide what is silly for another person to do? But the real point is/was, for whatever reasons, it is not ridiculous for a person to get a little angry, for waiting almost a year for a product with promised specs and then that camera is not delivered as promised.

I need a stronger codec.

I don't think that's fair. A lot of people have been waiting for a promised product, perhaps even started planning projects based on these promised specs, or decided against other equipment because of BM's promised specs. Why should they be told how to feel when disappointment is forced upon them?

Yeah right, I just picked up a Sigma, and although it's not as sharp as your Zeiss... I never realized how ugly I was until I saw my self through that lens. Lol. And yes, that kid had major game... I'm wondering if I should go out and buy some Huggies... It might work if I can find 'em in my size.

What... I said with "all due respect."

Man, with all due respect, you're a jerk face.

Have you looked into the Leeming LUT? @TheRenaissanceMan has been thoroughly following the development. The LUT, plus in camera settings seems to be getting some great results.

"He a little player," ha. Great footage... And damn you have a pretty steady hand. If that was my video, you'd have motion sickness. The Zeiss look amazing. The footage must be crazy sharp without the black satin.

Even the way the resolution of his wrinkles from aps-c to full frame to medium format is telling. Very interesting. I'm sure I'll get blasted for using non-quantifiable words, but the image is heavier or weightier the larger the format. Pretty cool.

Not sure. Never had a reason to run it that long. Sorry, wish I could be more helpful. But I assume it's normal and has to do with maximum file size.

A loaner?