mercer

What WB setting do you use? With the NX500, I was using the baked in settings, but then I got lazy and started using AWB. I tried Kelvin, but I need a lot more practice for that precision. Recently, I tried the AWB + Tungsten. It seems to work pretty good, does the NX1 have that? If so, do you know its purpose? Also, how do you get that cool haze in your grades? It gives your images that smoky, vintage look.

I had the 50mm 1.4 ai-s as well, one of my first Nikkors, but I never really loved the lens. I liked my 50mm series e, I spent 17 bucks on way better. So, I ended up selling my set of Nikons. When I was looking for a good 24mm, I got a great deal on non-ai. I decided to pick up a 50mm to compliment it and just went with the cheapest f2 I could get. While I was waiting for it to arrive, I did some research and learned that it was considered by some to be one of the sharpest 50mm lenses. And once I started shooting with it, I can confirm it. It's an absolutely beautiful lens. In fact, I am considering getting a D5500 now because of that lens set.

I think the zeiss milvus are probably better than the sigma art, but for the money, the sigma's are great lenses. Some have said that the 18-35mm is one of the best zoom lenses ever made. My friend just bought the 30mm 1.4 and I shot a couple clips with it yesterday, and it looked good. I think Kendy Ty shoots only with that lens... But the older version. Look into the xeen lenses too, supposed to be very nice. There's also a member here, Rich, who is the owner of Dog Schidt Optics and he has some beautiful lenses he has repurposed for reasonable prices.

Yeah, I think EditReady is Mac only. I am no authority on the nx500. I have had more failures than successes, but I think I'm finally STARTING to get the hang of it. When it's right, the image is effin beautiful.

Looks great. The NX500 is the same way. I have done extensive testing and contrast at default 0 is the best. Tweaking contrast too much messes up the colors... At least to my eye. I tick saturation down to -4 and sharpness dialed all the way. Have you tried EditReady? I think it does a pretty good job. Of course I convert to 1080p prores. I think it gives the footage a little more weight. Black pro must is a good idea... Hmm. Anyway, your shots look wicked. You should make a video showing your coloring workflow.

Thanks Aaron, means a lot coming from you... I love your work. This color correction/grading thing is really new to me. I was using a t2i and eos-m for years... Shooting Prolost Neutral, most of the time, a lens would usually create the "look" I was going for. But the NX500 is a different beast altogether. Even though it's a consumer camera like the rebel line, it handles color entirely differently. Anyway, thanks for looking and the tip!!!

It's getting there. I don't love the last shot, but I'm definitely starting to get a better feel for it. Thanks for the tip with tweaking the gamma primarily... Helped a bunch.

At least it's not worse. Thanks for looking!!!

Here's another test. Thanks for humoring me. As always any tips are greatly appreciated!!!

Check out Mattias' videos. He has quite a few examples using vintage glass with the NX1. My favorite is his video using the 35mm 2.8 Carl Zeiss Jena. I believe it's the zebra version. I know the newer 35mm 2.4 is considered one of the best lenses ever made. Also some people feel the Nikkor 50mm f2 is the sharpest lens and it can be had for $50 or less.

Yeah, to be honest, gamma levels confuse me a little. I know a lot of people raise the gamma and get that hazy, milky look to their clips. Is that an in style look? I instinctually lower the gamma, but I do like that other look. Do you use different layers to adjust your highs and lows?

Thanks for taking the time Sekhar. So you don't tweak the contrast at all in post? I have always liked high contrast I guess, but I am realizing a lot of other people don't. Of course, I am using the waveform and I am not even bringing the lows down to the 0 line... I keep them around the 10 mark. The reason I lowered the saturation is two fold... 1. I was using the settings the guy from Cinema5D used for the NX500 introduction review... 2. Because the colors are way off at 0 saturation in camera, in the NLE, I can get more accurate colors then I am getting in camera. With that being said... I am obviously doing something wrong because it just doesn't look right. Thanks for the tips.

Yeah, I use -2 saturation as well. But I recently saw the demo video from the guy from cinema5d and he used -4 saturation in the demo, so I have been messing with that. The nx500 doesn't have gamma dr, and very little info out there regarding optimum settings, so it's test and next. No problem, I had actually seen a bunch of your videos a few months back. Look forward to the nx1 clips.

I am back with another test of the NX500. I have recently been testing the settings that were used in the Cinema5D promo video for the camera before its launch. He used Saturation -4, Sharpness -10, and I believe Contrast -5... even though that has not been confirmed. Either way, I am looking to use this cam for an upcoming horror short, so I was testing out some looks. I still haven't settled on the perfect settings for this camera, but to be honest I haven't done much shooting with it lately. I think I went a little heavy handed with one of the graded shots... Anyway thanks for looking and as always... any tips would be greatly appreciated.

Yeah, I have the NX500 and I have experimented with nearly every possible setting. My current set up is -4 saturation -10 sharpness and -5 contrast. Not sure how the colors are with the nx1, but I find the colors on the nx500 to be off. If I don't desaturate in camera, the yellows oranges and greens just don't look right. But I am a newbie, so it could be user error. Btw, love your videos man... Top notch!!!

I never saw any of Albert Fast's work until this post... I was blown away. Great stuff. Too bad he sold off the NX1 for the G7.

Trust me, get EditReady and don't look back. It is much more than just a transcoding tool. You can put LUTS on the footage pre transcoding, you can change frame rate and ratio, and there are a slew of metadata tools. It handles nearly every codec, except raw dngs, I have ever needed to convert and they constantly update it. And it is super fast.

Damn you Max... Now I want a 50d. Amazing colors. It looks like a vintage post card that would read Greetings from... That blue sky reminds me of Kodachrome. Nice job. And the funny part is, like the woman in your video, I was just finishing a Bloody Mary as I watched it. I also like how candid your videos are. You must be very unassuming or trustworthy because nobody in your videos seem uncomfortable at all.

Do you underexpose because of Gamma DR? I am still searching for the perfect settings for my NX500. It doesn't have Gamma DR or the choice of 0-255 or whatever the other option is. I really like your footage so if I could get my image looking half of what you're getting I'd be a happy filmmaker. Recently I have been exposing to the right with -4 saturation, -5 contrast and -10 sharpness and I have been getting pretty good results, but then I see your footage and learn you're underexposing = I am confused all over again. Btw, where do you live? It looks like the most beautiful place in the world.

Ricardo, you have some beautiful looks in those images. What camera settings are you using? Do you expose to the right and adjust in post, or do you try to nail your exposure in camera?

EditReady. I think ClipWrap may do it as well. It's cheaper than EditReady, but a lot more basic.

I have an affinity for cheap cameras... Mostly because I am poor, but with them comes a lot of headaches. Before I really understood anything about image quality and color correction and color grading I was ignorantly content with my eos-m and its factory firmware. I used vintage lenses to obtain different "looks." After spending the past 6 months reading this forum, I learned that I had a lot to learn... Still do. With 4k cameras coming into fashion, I decided I wanted one, but I couldn't afford a gh4 or an nx1, so I set my sights on the FZ1000 or the G7. While I patiently waited for the G7 to hit the stores or the FZ1000 to drop a little in price, I found a great deal on the Samsung NX500... $350 for the body. I immediately snatched one up (good thing I did because it went up to 500 bucks the next day) I'm sure some of you remember my failed tests with the camera. I was at a point where I was going to sell it, there was just something wrong with the way it handled color, but the image downsampled to 1080p was too amazing to deny. It has a... Weight to the image that was lacking in the 4K. So, Max I completely understand your 4K to 1080p conclusion. I am still not a fan of the way the camera handles color, but I am sure my skill set is, at least, partially to blame. Now after getting a little more experience with color, and how amazing B&W looks on the NX500, and experimenting with the 3x crop raw on the eos-m, I am confident in selling my a5100, my Q7 and my S100. I don't think I will ever shoot h.264 1080p again. When I am ready for an upgrade, I will probably buy a pocket cam or micro.

Max, I just watched your daughter Alice goes back to College video and I can honestly say that it is some of the most filmic looking video I have seen. Really great stuff. If I can get my videos to look half as good, I'll be pleased. I really love the 70s film aesthetic, especially the horror films like The Last House on the Left or Let's Scare Jessica to Death and I think it is a look that easily attainable with some vintage c-mounts, eos-m raw crop and a whole lotta patience... Not one of my strongest virtues, unfortunately.

Haha, my programming expertise began and ended with a Tandy computer back in 1986.

I almost bought a new GoPro black 3+ already modified for $275 last spring, but I was a little short on cash and I really was only interested in the 4 silver. I have seen a few videos online, and the quality looks pretty good... Just wish it was a bit cheaper to modify it.