JurijTurnsek

High doubt it, since it would mean physically extending the lens. Lens mount conversion is meant for mounts with similar flange distances - you can group them into DSLR mounts (long flange distance) and mirrorless mounts (short flange distance).

Nope, no dice. Tried this on a vimeo video that can only be played on a specific site. Can't be done using the latest FF.

My point being, that it will sell a ton irregardless of the conclusions of posters on this forums. Your voice is the minority. Your opinion is being taken into account for FS5, since you are the intended user group.

I believe you guys are dissecting this consumer camera way harder than an average user will. Once the price falls down to a more reasonable level (like A6000), these cams will be picked up by thousands of causal users like me - shooting photos and videos of your family and pets, usually clips shorter than 10 mins, documenting your travels, using high FPS sparingly etc. They (us) won't care about RS and overheating - IQ out of the box is key here. Sony already caters to professionals with many models, so having this cheap option is just a bonus.

To vimeo's credit, they made it very hard to download the video file, since it is split up into small chunks. Getting videos off Youtube is still simple, since you just need to detect the url.

No, it is not. It was fixed on the a7 series and lots of reports claimed that it was fixed with a6300. I really hope these guys just had the LCD closed against the camera of something like that.

uh, oh, several users reporting pretty severe overheating: http://***URL removed***/forums/thread/3978661

If you'd use Samyang's 8mm on APS-C sensor, you can get hyper-focal results even at f2.8. The price would be a lot more reasonable and size would be more manageable too.

FW update can fix it, so it could be worse

FF depth of field seems out of place in a surveillance camera. Wouldn't a FS7 sensor make more sense and you could keep the lenses smaller and cheaper. Not to mention the APS-C powerzoom lenses ....

Just not the the camera you'd use for videography: http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-announces-a-4k-full-frame-e-mount-network-camera/

In the comments I found this info: ISO 800 in S-Log 2 and 3.

No. Read it again, it is not written ambiguously.

Also, the Metaboes AF looks very impressive:

I started doing this too a couple of years ago. Versatility is key and R/W specs are the same. I wonder if anyone with CF cards is using an CD to microSD adapter or even CF->SD->mircoSD route (cram an Wi-Fi adapter in while you're at it too :D ).

Sony's rocker is also pressure sensitive. I wish Sony would implement more customizable control over PZ via the camera interface, since pressure sensitivity and fixed speed both have their uses.

Makes you wonder what kind of sharpness and AF speed you could get with A6300.

PZ adapter has an upside - it should be considerably faster than the inegrated versions. But then again, that is due to four AA batteries - another set of batteries to charge. Anyway, with two 18-135mm lenses, one could've been a PZ version.

A6300 and NX1 are not comparable at all - the form-factor matters! If Sony had the luxury of a NX1-sized body, 4K60p would be a real possiblity (if they didn't have the FS7 to protect). A6300 should be compared to NX500 or just called a sweetspot between NX1 and NX500.

Dual Pixel AF already does amazing video AF, so that was never the problem. Just the smooth zooming part needed to be addressed. To bad about the lackluster Canon 80D video specs.

They already have a 18-135 STM lens which is supposed to be good for video. Now they just added an USM version of the lens and made it power-zoom compatible. So even if they created a lens with integrated PZ (with the STM lens), there would still be a photography oriented USM version and customers could chose which one they preferred. Now, by my logic, it would make much more sense for them to have made the STM version PZ compatible, but I guess this power-zoom adapter is a recent idea of their product management team.

If STM lenses are focus-by-wire, why not just integrate power zoom like Sony and others do it? And why use a power zoom adapter on an USM lens? Aren't STM lenses preferred for their video AF?

Sony is reportedly coming out with a 4K60p Action cam sometime this year according to SAR) and I would expect GoPro do the same with HERO5. This should be a worthy upgrade, but I am not sure how the flagship action cams are selling in the market flooded with cheaper models.

This has been proven by many real world tests. I imagine that the one true benefit of less pixels is the faster read-out and faster processing, enabling more fps.

Does the release of a6300 mean we will see a a5300 with the usual touchscreen? That would drive some people crazy, right