PannySVHS

Hey guys! Thanks replying! Thing is, was interested in the phenomenon itself, as my monitor has been used by hobbyists for CC. I figured, VGA blends colors into one and another. This is to similar effect like CRT interlaced TVs do. Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo games look great on TVs but on computer displays with their limited colors and resolution well represented. The TVs scanlines helped to smooth the 16bit consoles gfx. Oh, the 16bit didnt stand for color:) Thank you for the advices. Gonna get another display most definately. Great tips, thanks! Yeah, man, gonna get another monitor most definately!:) cheers

Hey, great! Which one of the Vivitars is the rebranded super wide II? Unfortunately on the Sigma Focus throw between 3m and infinity is also ultra short, Hey Liam, not wordy at all, great points! Hey Justin, how much is the focus throw, half turn, 360, 270, how much in inches between 3m(9ft) and infinity? On the nFD 28mm it´s only half an inch between 3 and infinity. Hey, pricey, pricey:) The Elmarit seems to have a short throw between 3 and infiity as well, might be stell difficuilt to do focussing changes while recording video within that distance range.

Hallo, the Canon FD 28mm is a nice nice lens. Beautiful look and a nice price. One thing it is lacking is a convinient focus throw betweem 3m (9ft) and infinity. It´s less than half an inch or 1cm. Are there recommendations for nice price adaptable lenses with manual focus and longer, managable focus throw between the range for 3m to infinity? Also, my question, if 0.5 wide angle adapter are acceptable in comibination with a 28mm regarding focussing and ok optical performance, are there a few acceptable ones available? cheers

Freaking great color! 20mm- beautiful FOV, if one knows how to use it! What Fstop did you shoot this with, 3.5? won an auction for the Canon 20mm nFD for 220 USD. Kinda worried now, because manual focus on the 28mm FD is very tricky from 3m to infinity, focus throw tinely short between these two marks, so focus can easily to be off.

Hey Geoff, so is VGA vs HDMI/DVI kind of comparable with: 64 video game colors appearing like 1024(fi) on an old CRT interlaced television VS looking like the exact number of 64 on a progressive computer monitor? Means, VGA blends harsh steps between hues into another, appearing like smooth transitions? Whereas digital ports work well to make artefacts and broken transitions visible on dislplays? cheers

Hey! Thank you for your reply. This would be the next great step for my kind of grading mankind, calibration and stuff:) What I am worrying and worried about right now is my VGA port. Could it be that it blends harsh steps from hue to hue together, so artefacts, banding and such are not recognizable, whereas digital ports give a much more realistic impression of the harsh digital artefacts? It´s like oldschool videogames look good on old interlaced crt tv, colors well blent into one another, whereas on computerscreens it really shows their limited number of 32 onscreen colors.

Hallo, I´m not a grading expert but enjoy doing it, because it´s great to control the look of the images from shooting to post. Got some nice results but mixed bags too. The problem is that my monitor does´nt seem show the 8bit obscurities well enough to be recognizable for me, banding, pixelisation, stuff like that. My monitor has only a VGA connector and seems to hide the grading errors and digital artefacts very well. Is that a "feature" of the analogue connection due to blending the nastiness of grading errors into a beautiful and smooth image? Asking so, because on TVs with HDMI, I could see the failed parts of the image, whereas on my monitor it looked fine. This is with grades of the more extreme kind. Other less problematic footage looks like a well representation of the image and nice on a variety of output devices such as beamer, DVI or HDMI connected displays and TVs. Thanks for your advices. cheers, Martin

Yeah, those laid back and charmingly goofy reviews by Philip Bloom were really something. I remember downloading one, so I wouldnt have to be bothered by internet buffer. Then back with a big cup of hot chocolate and a pile of cake and apples I relaxed with this warmhearted, amusing and charming presentation, and outside it was winter in Berlin. Your reviews and videos are awesome, masterful vignettes. Your digital Bolex footage and GH4 review are my most remembered pieces from you, your Tokyo Storm and FS100 anamorphic my EOSHD starters. Your blog plus forum is a dictionary of love for the craft, technical knowhow, treasures and rare gems of knowledge, hey- rare gems of people too! Keep it up, Andrew, this is awesome, you´re awesome!

24mm F2.8 sounds nice enough to be boosted to f2:) so far the 28 has been a favorite of mine, so light and nice to handle, a pretty one for very low money these days.

the ikonoskop is ccd, isn´t it. beautiful footage from it anyway. anybody had the chance to work with it? it´s a rare beast and not in production anymore, afaik.

Hey Andrew! I sent you a pm. Don´t wanna brag about it, but there is a place in Berlin where people do just that, using all their time the dayjob leaves them and do films and more. What can I say, it´s a pretty nifty (did i get that word right, lemme check on dict.cc:) place. Think I got the word right:) You and some awesome people here inspired me to apply for that school and it´s been as nice as it can be, besides the burden of a non filmic day job. Here is a screenshot from a 24h hour film challenge me and a collegue student did on the semilegendary G6, no filmschooltech allowed, just practicals, a photolamp bounced, boosted 28mm FD and way too high iso 1600:) Shoot, now I spoiled the camera for my planned guess the camera challenge:) cheers Andrew and friends of this awesome place EOSHD! Marty

Hey Aaron! Awesome! Thats the thread I was looking for, your "writing promps" one! Thanks so much, buddy!!:)

Thanks a lot guys! Very helpful! Now I need some lenses. Good thing Andy and Andrew started this awesome lenses thread!

Thanks a lot, sounds good enough for the purpose. Thanks for the advice about battery life!

Hello everybody, was wondering, if it was any good to use a tablet as an external monitor via Wifi and Panasonic Image App. Would it be good enough for a director to see, if the shot is framed to his liking and if lighting and acting would be captured well enough? Asking, because G6 or G7 would be my choice to shoot a script with a director. Would like him to be able to follow the action via external monitor/tablet, so he doesnt have to stand right beside me all the time while filming. cheers and thanks

Hallo again, if anybody remembers the post or the website, please drop a line. That website seemed an awesome concept for shortfilm makers a great find for anybody interested in making a short. Some of you who posted in that thread seemed really exited about it. cheers

Hallo guys, I remember reading a post and discusstion about a website, where people post their shortfilm scripts and other people do their filmic interpretations of these. So after a period of time there are a number of different shorts produced for one and the same script. Then the forum community gets to vote the one they like the best. Does anybody remember that post, discussion or website. Would be a great thing to participate in, actively and as part of an audience as well. regards, Marty

I think this topic has been up on Eoshd right after GH4 hit the market, since it allows to either shoot in 0-255 or 16-235. Can´t go wrong with 0-255 as this video shows. I think Floris pretty much did this video just for the people of Eoshd back then.

Thanks Merce for showing that footage! Think it´s related as the small footprint with ibis would make this a very interesting camera due to the combination of size, stabilization and image quality. So my apologies. Would be nice to know, if HDMI out would work for monitoring and if processing is as nice as G7 is supposed to be. Soon we will know.

Hey Merce, great find with the Canon lens. Do you have some footage, you would like to share? Really fully covers the 4K image? cheers, Marty

I think it is great indeed. Nice cinematic energy and beautiful to watch. Great job!

Hey Eoshd fellow filmer:) What lenses are your zoom trinity?:) cheers

I think the first two sentences are very true, regarding the camera. The foliage on the ground looked really great. I really enjoy the mentality of yours, grabbing a camera and shooting stuff for our viewing pleasure. regards and thanks!

hey merce!:) great contribution. nice footage. funny thing, was thinking about a eoshd challenge: doin a little short with a FZ1000. I imagine, sensor and codec could hold a candle to a G6. Got some nice footage out of that G6 with grading. Problem is, got a short done with my two mates and four actors, but just playing around too much with Davinci. Unfortunately I got the best results with a by eye approach, so harder for me to reproduce the workflow on other projects.

Oh, I think, the gm1 has even more mojo imagewise. Martin Walgrens vimeo footage looks beautiful, so does Eoshd´s jase´s (jan s´) footage. Sensor from the GX7 with a beautiful overall image pipline. GM1 for hundred bucks then, Mattias? That would be a crazy deal then! Thinking about getting a GM5 for being my interchangeable lens photophone without the phonepart:) Oh yeah, F3, there was one on Ebay, didnt sell for 1000 Euros, second try it sold for 2300 Euros. Great chance missed, but 950 shooting hours are not to be ignored neither.