zerocool22

this is a pretty cool pocket camera. I never expected canon to come out with a camera specced out so good. Built in Nd Filters, cooling fan, canon log 3.. Makes me wonder why they didnt include built-in ND's into camera like the S5II, A7SIII and so on. And now all of a sudden a pocket camera has it. Some of the key features of the PowerShot V1 include: 1.4″ CMOS sensor Ultra-wide angle 16-50mm zoom lens 4K 60P recording Canon Log 3 Built-In Cooling Fan Built-in ND Filter (3-stops) 30fps stills performance (electronic shutter)

I think you are right. I just watched this video on youtube,and I said wow this looks nice, Wanted to see what lenses and camera they used. And offcourse it was an alexa with lomo anamorphics.... Allthough you have to take in consideration of the lightning, set design, talent and crew (people who use this type of gear usually have more experience overall).

Hi, Back in the day, I loved browsing vimeo for cool projects. Now vimeo has banned browsing video's in Europe (unless you use a vpn). What are you using to find cool projects/video's today? Youtube is hard to find anything good as your feed gets blasted with camera tests, instructional video's, vlogs etc. Not sure if there are any good facebook groups where talented people share their work, as most groups are spammed with mediocre work/projects. Just looking for exceptional work that I can use as inspiration. As over the last years I found it harder to find good inspiration and most of the work I see out there is more or less the same. Any recommendations/tips? Thanks!

Have not seen the deal in europe.

Yes his work was great, I much liked his earlier work with the t2i vs the new camera that he is using now though.

Yes and no, would it make a difference to 99.9% of the people viewing? No Would it make a difference to the guy editing the video? 99.9% Maybe I get bothered too much too fast while editing. But editing clips that stand out, vs clips that are ok, but I need to adjust a lot takes too much fun out of the job for me.

It just pops. can't explain it. I could look at it forerever, while the fX3 looks bland/boring

Yeah cant explain it either, it looks more organicw seems to have this 3d pop, skintones dont bother me. I really dislike the reds in skintones of panasonic camera's. It looks like people have infected skin. Sure you can correct it or try to correct it in post. But god damn if it comes out that good straight of camera is so underrated. Each time I edit intervieuws I get bothered by panasonic skintones. Sure it could be that their skin sucks, but arri or canon just seem to fix it in camera. And c500ii or alexa footage helps me enjoy editing footage, while editing panasonic interviews especially make me hate the footage fast.

The alexa does really stand out again. I would have guessed the burano would have done much better over the fx3, but he gap is closer in that case. But it has been 15 years since the arri alexa has been released, strange that sony nor canon cant beat an image from an 15 year old camera. Allthough they beat it on other fronts, but IQ wise..

Not sure if they used same lens in this case, but the difference is huge in this one.

I just mean side by camera comparisons, the difference is night and day. (Not accounting different lights, actors, set design) just side by sides. Exact same setup.

Hi, Random question, how come camera's like the Arri Alexa, canon C500ii, red Raptor look so much better then canon R5 ii, canon C70, sony A7SIII, sony fx3, panasonic S5II? I mean the skintones just look so pleasing while on any other mirrorless camera's, the skintones always come out like yuk. And by the way technology is advancing I find it very strange that these companies arent able to deliver something price friendly that looks as good as something released in 2010 (arri alexa)! blackmagic has made some great advancements pricewise, but arent quite there yet I feel (or at least nog in the pockets or pyxis, allthough much better then anything in their price range, I do love the look of the blackmagic 12K OLPF). If its a sensor thing, surely those old sensors could be bought at cheap prices nowadays? Processing power seems out of the question. Protecting higher end camera's seems like the best answer. Also probably because they could sell more camera's that look nog as good, but have more features like for example the S5II has so many specs for the price. cheers

A c70 looks way better then a R5 or r5c (have not seen a comparison with r5 ii). But I tempted to buy one, and its cheaperbused as well. Allthough i like the form factor of a r5 better + it can take good photos. Then again I was comparing it with an arri alexa and c500 ii. And both looked better then a c70. But more expensive and heavier/bulkier.

What camera would you pick video IQ wise? The r5 ii or your c70? What about run and gun? Thanks

I don't seem able to find a review video that compares the c500ii with the canon c80 and the c400. Did anybody came across one? I want to see the image difference between those camera's. I recently have used the C500ii and I love the image over lots of camera's (packs a lot of dr, and has good color, and looks smooth). The c500ii is quite bulky though. So I wonder if the C80 and C400 provide the same IQ.