zerocool22

The blackmagic one is affordable and also very good.

I love Philip Bloom for the information what he has given us. But I dont think he is a DOP, not even a cinematographer, videographer/camera operator is more likely the term you can describe him with.

But still this would sell like hotcakes. I def will get one unless they are 20k.

Well I have seen only this test so far. But not sure what to think of it.

Did you test your C200 vs your C300 II? I have only seen older tests without the new firmware upgrade. Offcourse the c200 is codec wise crippled. But what are your thoughts about these 2 camera's. The c200 is newer and cheaper, but the C300 ii has more codec options. But the image from the C200 doesnt seem to look worse then the c300 ii (not sure if I can judge sharpness/colours/image of these youtube video's)

haha and I already would be satisfied with a 2K one with a good image and with high DR and 60fps.

Conspirary, well its just companies trying to force and create a new market where they can earn a lot of money on.

Going to bump this again, to check if anybody has a 5D IV on here that is willing to give it a go.

Wow has it already been 10 years. what have I done with my life. At least Philips career took off from then and peaked and is now back where ever he started I guess. I remember Philip Bloom's 7D tutorial series. Which helped me out a lot when starting out. But dang this is the proof right here, dont fixate on gear and stop waiting on the gear to become affordable.

Does nobody with a 5D IV want to try this?

Did you shoot c300 ii vs c300 ii external recording test? Based on dr, color, sharpness, easy to colorgrade? Yeah reckon alexa mini is prob still 5 years away for buying it under 10k.

You are forgetting white balance and extra dr of raw. I still feel the UMP image is closer then the c300 ii to the alexa. What are your thoughts Ed?

Too bad it only records raw externally and too bad they crippled the c200. Maybe the next versions will be where its at.

Whenever prores is not available, DNxHD is quite good also. h264 for corporate/event stuff though

Well sorta, but not quite. Your shutter speed is different, so it looks weird then. Did you test the ronin s vs the weebill?

Yeah I am also ordering the nucleus N. I dont use AF lenses anyway. Well even handheld stuff looks smooth at 60fps. How is it at 24fps which is how I will be shooting 99,9% of the time anyway?

Yeah tangerine mainly worked because it worked as reality smartphone footage I think.I could not bear to watch it though. I saw "Searching" last week, this blew me away, all cheap cameras webcams but it worked flawlessly.

I have read this comment a lot these days. But no example looks good enough to compete with even arthouse films. Sure script, acting and sound is reallly important, and maybe this is a personal thing for me as maybe I have watched way too many movies. But if something is off imagewise I get instantly turned off which offcourse is not only the camera but also the skills of the cinematographer/colorist(as I have seen bad look Alexa films as well, you have to go above and beyond to make this thing look bad). Everything in a movie should be on a high level if one thing is off the movie is off. So using a great script, great actors, great audio but you are using a cheap camera, that sure is a waste of everybodies time.

This is my plan, have no experience with it though, but what I have seen online it is doable.

Wonder when this will come to europe.

Good news, hopefully it is only a matter of time now, as Fusion is now part of Resolve I guess it will be included in the next update or release.

Maybe, lets wait and see. Not only sensor but hopefully capable codecs as well. Ayone watched bad blood on netflix? Its shot with Red dragon camera's, and I had to say it did not look like cinema at all. The lighting was ok I think, but the image was way too sharp for my taste, it looked like a soap opera. (I watched it on a 4K tv though, so maybe thats part of the problem) I applaud his work with the GH4, but it is nowhere near something I would pay money for to watch it. If I did I would want it back. I wish somebody would come along with a digital camera with a soft film grain image but high DR with smooth highlight rolloff and amazing colors, 1080p is all I need + 60fps. I often wonder why people would rent camera's. Even studio's, or production houses. Just buy the camera and use it, when done sell it again. I will bet it will be a lot cheaper.

Sony just stop releasing shit like this for your own sake. It looks like shit, the effects are shit, havent seen the movie but looks like the acting and the story are shit aswell (based on the trailer).

Hopefully Davinci Resolve will follow soon. As it is maybe Premiere's best functionality as of now, or maybe warp stabilizer.

With the new tilta handle where you can place a sony battery, how long does that run cs lpe6?