data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc5fb/fc5fb6448664b1f1a5e55821fc2be8552f1ba62e" alt=""
zerocool22
Members-
Posts
1,658 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Everything posted by zerocool22
-
Personally I find that fuji has the best color science out there not only mirroless, but basically everything. Maybe loses against Arri. As for now I shoot with an A7S ii, but want to upgrade this. Hopefully the GH5 will blow it out of the water. Not sure if it can do that. The anamorphic options are a big win for the GH series. And Sony will probably wait 5 years for implementing any anamorphic on their cameras. But if the image out of the GH5 somewhat dissapoints, I think I will save up for a RED raven or kinefinity terra or ursa mini 4.6k.
-
Its marked in feets
-
Well I own a A7S II right now, and I hope the GH5 will blow it out of the water(I dont need iso over 3200).
-
I am also selling mine for 500€, pm me if interested.
-
- There is quite some noise there though. In the close ups its ok, but when you look at the wide shot its bouncing around everywhere(look at the right guys pants). - The skintones look off to me, way too red. But it is winter, so that might also come into play. - The image seems to be quite the same as the GH4, maybe somewhat cleaner and more detailed. But this footage does not have that wow factor to me, but it is a interview after all(but also the ice shots, look way too yellow and that hotspot behind the glass is drawing my attention. I feel like a 1DX II might have done a better job then this. But lets wait till next week, and hopefully some side by sides with other cameras will come out soon.
-
Hey, I was just wondering, shouldnt the blackmagic ursa mini 4.6k have a pricedrop soon, as its already almost 2 years after announcement and it is still listed the same price. Your thoughts? Cheers,
-
Yeah I would like to see a street night shot at iso 1600 at F-stop 2.8. To see how much noise there is + we could also see how it handles highlight rolloff(if there is something bright in the frame like a street light)
-
Yeah prices are dropping fast on the MX camera's. If you got time, I reckon you can get a used epic mx kit for 5-k in 6 months as tech is changing fast, as more ravens and scarlet-w's have hit the market. Im sticking to my A7S II for another 6 months, then I shall see what way I will go. GH5 might be a cheap option though, but Ill have to wait and see.
-
Thanks all for the kind words!
-
So whatever it is what you are testing How are the noise levels comparing it to a GH4? As on the GH4 iso1600 was unusable for me. Hopefully on this new camera there will be a massive improvement on this department. And how about the Dynamic Range, is it small upgrade or quite good? And finally is it still the same codec or could we expect something different like h265? Thanks!
-
Hey, I visited Japan for a week, and tested out the 5D III and to see what it can do with Magic Lantern.
-
yeah the 5DIII RAW is awesome(I preferred it to my C300 cause the LCD screen on the C300 sucks, bokeh and colorwise ) but is not 4K and it lacks a bit of detail and sharpness, not the mention the timeabsorbing workflow.
-
yeah if you can find a good RED mx for that price, I would go for the RED MX. Only downside for me is its size, as I can not use it on my ronin-m. Otherwise I would be doing the same. Guess I have to wait until the RED Epic-x prices drop below 4k, or over a year when I might buy a used kinefinity terra. So probably the GH5 will be my next purchase in the meantime.
-
8:29 I would pick the Phantom 4 any day. The sensor on the mavic is also smaller then the P4.
-
Well if you need it to be compact as it can get. Get the Mavic. If you dont mind a tab bit more bigger drone, that has better IQ then go with the phantom 4.
-
Only upgrade it needs is +10bit prores
-
I am not sure why everybody wants IBIS, do you all shoot handheld? If I may add another crazy feature request, please add RAW video (but I am pretty sure they will not ).
-
Yeah A7S iso's are crazy and are almost never needed. However a clean iso 1600 or 3200 would be very welcome. Like when you are running run and gun with an anamorphic lens, and you can only open up to 2.8 or 5.6 and you do not have access to any lights (yeah I know it is like 0,00001% of you guys that are doing this, but this is something that I would welcome). I dont need IBIS or autofocus. I shoot with manual lenses and I use grip to stabilize (gymbals, dolly's, glidecams). So my wishlist besides the 10bit: - Clean iso up to 3200 - Hopefully 1 or 2 stops better DR - hopefully the image is better then the GH4 with a external recorder. - Anamorphic desqueeze internal(probably not likely) - Cropmarks - improved v-log - better codec
-
I bet they will not. They were a year behind on the gh4 with 4k. +Sony has a lot of higher end lines to protect.
-
Any news on: -DR -clean/ noise iso -sensor -image (better color profiles?)
-
wow I am really unimpressed with the 5D iv.
-
Yeah I am looking into the Raven or the Terra. I hope blackmagic will up their game this weekend @ IBC.
-
Well I just saw "blood father" last night, and I was thinking why did the director did not shoot another take of this scene, and gave the actors some feedback as this clearly is not working. But I have also been on a set, where I had to shoot a scene 29 times, because the actors didnt deliver 100%, and in the end it was not much better then the first 28 takes. But we lost a lot of shooting time, so we had to cut a lot of other shots, and just use the master shot of that scene.
-
Yeah If only we can get the Varicam image out of the GH line. Or RAW or any decent codec. As these dslr's codecs suck. I know I can only speak for narrative filmmakers out there. And 80% of the dslr users are probably doing more event, business, wedding, travel, sport videos and could care less.
-
I disagree, before I knew anything about camera's or filmmaking I was somebody from the audience, and I could always tell if the movie looked bad or not. When the first digital films came out, I just hated the look. I didnt even knew it was digital back then, I just thought It just doesnt look good. (years later, I can tell you it was the lack of high DR, highlights were overexposed, the image was too sharp, stuff that I didnt was used too before). Ok I was a more serious film enthousiast then your average cinema visitor. But there are millions like me out there, and its those serious film enthousiast who still make a difference in cinema sales & DVD purchases.