kaylee

@anonim whats been up? you havent liked it?

omg ? better check amazon prime ? that thing looks like a camera from silent hill

that is seriously one of the most hideous things ive ever seen ?

OMFG

yeah... hmm idk im thinkin maybe one of them fancy motorized sliders could work...? ? then the move could be timed the same over and over... that would be "dope" @webrunner5 as long as the slider itself isnt in my shot, that would work right...? edit: omg these things are borderline robots and im scared of/hate robots

ive done that too ? minus the gimbal. at the time it worked pretty well ? nah i want this to be professional af tho thats the thing. like a spielberg move. its the aesthetic of this entire short so its super important, NOT just one shot u kno

heeyyy guizee sooo im trynna figure out how to do a bunch of dolly shots without a dolly...! i CAN use a dolly on tracks if i have to, BUT that makes stuff wildly complicated for what im planning, you see... > im designing a short where almost all of the shots are dolly pull backs in different locations. the camera is moving directly away from the subject in space, perpendicular to it, right? we've all seen this a million times so, im looking at options like sliders and idk where to start rlly, but please keep in mind that whatever devices i use have to stay out of the shot based on the movement described above ^^^ any suggestions yall??? keeping this light, quick, mobile, etc would be great, but I want nice smooth stable dolly-like moves, otherwise between gimbals and post stabilization i wouldnt even worry abt it i have no idea what my options rlly are. how would you go about doing something like this indie style in 2019? zoom lens or zoom in post isnt gonna work on this one, i want the camera moving in real space...

^^^

hmmm...! this thread has gone thru some changes...! as i was saying...

DUDE! unreal

yeah..... i guess i genuinely feel sorry for people who are trying to learn, and DO take his nonsensical advice seriously, and waste a bunch of time trying to figure out wtf hes talking about

hi plucas~! i dont know the answer to your question, but i can tell you that youre about to join a very cool club ? • its super cool • only the cool kids do it • youre cool now also: guys i think we should make up some kewl jackets or something

maybe he is a dentist after all ?

i kno rite ???

same!

amazing stuff!!! wow...

Herrlo friends, this is Kaylee Sr. Due to honor points of my accont please diregard such words about Mr. E.S. If oyu would care to, I have perfected this drone for selfies/action cam or gimbal Hakunna Matata, *drops character* edit: omg. lookit the description

Zach, why did you post this? your mind is a fascinating place gotta tell ya tho... i think youre right tbh i dont think that you should even try to shoot something without a C700... just hold off until then good plan!

@BTM_Pix mad genius!!! amazin!!!

@Django so true. im a big x-files fan, and the show looks freakin awesome in HD, i LOVE the color, everything, but a lot of the establishing shots are in crap-o-vision, and its really jarring~! like yes, its that bad lol found this on reddit

ive been looking at some eos r 1080p, its really nice. how do you like it?

whatever your hurdles are to overcome, it might be bad, heck it might be AWFUL (i kno), but it could still probably be worse why dont you be inspired by chuck close? chuck close is an american painter in his early career, he painted hyperrealistic portraits that looked like photos unfortunately, Although the paralysis restricted his ability to paint as meticulously as before, Close had discovered a new, and i think, better way to paint than before. his newer pieces are more interesting, and serve to cement his importance in art history so, the moral of this story is be glad you're not in a wheelchair

if youre trying to do a comparison thats even in the realm of objectivity, take what you think is a high quality 4k clip, render it out at 1080p, and watch both. compare. easy this video is wildly subjective, it makes its point, but... cmon

im aware of that, it was a gross generalization about "seeing a difference'