Jump to content

kaylee

Members
  • Posts

    1,700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kaylee

  1. they havent – its not a secret! theres tons of info on youtube! but i get what you mean – i dont have those answers, i dont have answers at all – i have questions the NIST 'investigation' was like the warren commission – set up to reach predetermined conclusions, the literal opposite of the scientific process. did you look at the link i posted? please take a look at the evidence with an open mind! look here http://www.ae911truth.org/news/evidence.html the manhattan project involved at least 130,000 people and the powers that be kept a lid on that
  2. wow this thread would have gotten a lot of attention not too long ago... guess that speaks for itself whos using a 5d4 for video out there? anybody?
  3. i assure you these 2800 architects and engineers do not think the earth is flat http://www.ae911truth.org/ im designing a building so i actually need it to not fall down due to 'normal office fires' what i am telling you is true; i understand the principle of cognitive dissonance and i forgive your trespasses
  4. all this TSA horeshit is based on the fear of 911 which was a FAKE INSIDE JOB so
  5. a haiku by @Ed_David URSA Mini Pro So good but Blackmagic tho Ah, buyer's remorse
  6. ^^^ this Andrew, please dont go – if nothing else consider blogging about more personal projects and your workflow for what youre doing at the moment? or whatever! i think i speak for a lot of people when i say that id read your blog if it was about what youre eating for dinner ?
  7. kaylee

    DIY silks

    ? the first one i made flew away
  8. "Theatricality and deception... powerful tools to the uninitiated" idek why nolan shot any of that movie on 70mm since its the same smh
  9. so is it fair to say that in practice its an artistic argument vs a technical one?
  10. this is actually more like a tag team event than a one on one match... theres factions
  11. i still honestly dont understand im not smart enough – i cant do the math, but i totally buy that logic. sounds like it makes sense to me. but then why have i always though that theres a specialness to medium and large format photography, ever since i started shooting 35mm film (with limited experience in medium and large format) over 20 years ago? im just trying to find the #truth omg! ? its been going on that long? the eternal battle
  12. AWWW yisssss lets have it out!! @jcs vs @tupp deathmatch!!! TheREMUST BE A WINNER seriously tho when i STARTED posting on this board years ago certain ppl were having this EXACT same argument... and i still dont know the truth. im gonna start a movement like the 911 truthers called... uhm... sensor size truthers? #sensorsizeTRUTH
  13. totally agree. and a flippy screen. id buy one for sure. so would a lot of other people
  14. @Phil A my thoughts are that it sucks, as you demonstrated in your photos, but you gotta deal with it and of course that phenomenon is 100% the same for still images... without involving any of the complexity of motion pictures, i have a frustrating time finding a happy medium for a jpg i want to post online across the screens of the consumer devices that i personally own – theyre wildly different
  15. THIS IS A FANTASTIC IDEA!!! I THINK ABOUT THIS ALL THE TIME!!! i ~WISH~ there was an option really geared toward graphics pros like that!!!
  16. when i first saw the trailer for la la land i could tell within seconds that it was shot on film, but who else can tell, other filmmakers? certainly not the kids that watch this lana video on their iphones – i have to think any grainy look just reads as 'retro' to them as much as i could criticize this video as looking a bit phony, on the positive side i think that the borderline 8mm extreme graininess is necessary to read as graininess on the itty bitty screen of that very same iphone *I* waited to get home to watch this video on my tv to comment ?
  17. ive come to terms with the fact that i really just like fast, lightweight primes. if im gonna carry around anything else id personally love a zoom lens with a constant aperture of at least 2.8 or wider with IS... thats what itll take for me to buy another "heavy" lens lol. i mean, my 7d with the 17-55 2.8 on it was heavy enough so that it wasnt fun to take places, and in hindsight i wish id used it more... but i love a wide constant aperture... as wide as possible ? so im p much looking for the ff version of the 17-55 i guess
×
×
  • Create New...