John Matthews

I'm rather curious to see how the AF features translate to video. From what I've seen from the G9ii, it's very good. I'll be one of the first to check into this. Also, I'd like to play around with those proxy files as they could be changing many people's workflow and storage considerations. I remember the A7r ii started with style of proxy editing and I wonder if it'll be better with Panasonic's implementation.

I've purchased some new and some used. If you're super lucky, you can buy new for used prices. IMO, that is the time to buy. For Panasonic, it's during Black Friday. A few years back, I got the Olympus E-P7 with the kit lens and the Olympus 75mm f/1.8 for 899 euros. That's probably the best deal I've ever found for new. In France, you have leboncoin, which is very good too with some amazing deals from people who just want to unload material or just don't understand what they have. When you buy, you have the choice of sending it back. If you know your cameras, you can thoroughly test it. Buying off Ebay is an option too, but you never seem to find good deals anymore (I gave up). MBP is also a great choice, but they're too expensive for some cameras and lenses.

If size is the utmost importance, I'd just stick with the 20mm. Yes, the AF is a pain 1-3% of the time, but you can live with it. I got rid of two of them and I regret it today. I love the Olympus 17 f/1.8, but it is just slightly bigger. Otherwise, I'm fine with the 14mm f/2.5. If size isn't important, I have the 17mm f/1.2 and I find it a true gem...

The 14-140 is definitely on my short list. I think I might go with the 17mm f/1.8 for indoor stuff/low-light.

I agree that the only usable MF (focus while filming) is on the Olympus 14-42 EZ, but no OIS as you said. The Panasonic 14-42 PZ is the next best with a silly MF lever. I've had all three lenses though and never thought of trying to manual focus one after the other- could be an interesting comparison.

Yes, we have talked about it. I'm not sure if it should be disqualified due to a lack of a proper shutter for photos.

Yes, I saw a few videos regarding this. He's right- it's a fun camera and I wish Panasonic would update it. The best part of it is the flip-up screen. Unfortunately, the worst part about it is the moiré in 1080p and overheating in 4k at 5 minute or less. As a travel camera or B-cam, it's a great choice IMO. What I find amazing is the fact that many of the newer small cameras cannot be kept in-stock; yet, we see nothing from Panasonic who IMO is the leader in know-how for this category of camera. I'm not sure if their heads are stuck in the sand or just bad forward thinking. In any case, it isn't good. Hope they turn it around soon.

I use the ATEM mIni in a very simple way. Again, it's to limit the things that could go wrong, but it has been very reliable. I only use it to show my iPad screen (this can be very customizable). I just push the picture in picture button to "on" and there's my screen. I'm on the side of the screen so my students can still see me. There are macro features and tons of other things, but you cannot do simple things like play a media file (that's why I have the iPad). Also, a lot of stuff is simple too hard to get ready. On the iPad, it's a cake-walk. You could also use in combination with OBS or something. I have done this but find the iPad solution works better and it's more intuitive- again, no preparation provided I've prepared the lesson on the iPad in the first place. My goal was to simple go to the live setup area, turn on a power strip or two and connect. I should say that I only do one-to-one classes, not groups and it further simplifies everything. The number of variable is astounding and I'm surprised I've had few problems (knock on wood). In April, I'll be getting fiber put in (not that I really need it), but it could be the biggest challenge that my system has faced- wish me luck.

I've done hundreds of hours now in English training. It's not my main gig, but it's good to do something a little different. I use a GH2 with the Olympus 17mm f/1.8, a M2 MacMini, a Behringer mixer, a Atem Mini, a Audio-Technica AT 875 R, an iPad Pro 12.9", an Apple Pencil, 3 cheap lights with softboxes, and some decent headphones. I've tried many other things too, but so far, this works best for me. My cardinal rule is to have as much as possible with a cord and no batteries as to reduce my single point failures. My only exception is the Apple Pencil, but I plug it in whenever I'm done. The key for me is to have as little setup time as possible- just flip one or two switches and I'm up and ready to go.

I'm fairly certain every manufacturer who's interested will have something lined up for that moment. In fact, I'll probably just wait it out. There's also a chance Nikon gets some easy money for licensing the idea of compressed to others on the cheap- that would be good for whole industry and also good for Nikon. Four years is nothing at this point when 2010 cameras are still viable solutions in 2024 and beyond.

Redcode RAW was initially implemented in the early 2010s, but the filing was December 28th 2007. I imagine the patent will only last a few more years. This must have also played a role in the acquisition. Nikon will have a very short window to leverage it.

This is actually a great point. Maybe Nikon hopes to have more leverage in sensor negotiations with Sony or anyone else.

Exactly. Nikon has shown over and over again that their management gets cocky and stupid; then, they end up promoting some guy who knows what they're doing and turn the ship around making some awesome products, only to return to the previous situation cocky leadership and 5+ years of stagnant products. Red survives on lawsuits and ULA's. The now ex-owners are in a "cash-in" situation where they can buy it back at a later date when Nikon fails. Yes, Nikon came out with some great products recently, for sure, but who thinks they truly know what they're doing at a business, financial, and cultural level? The jury is still very much out on their turn-around. Give it another 5-10 years and we'll see.

I've always been bothered by both of these companies. Nikon has always been a company with great valued products and colors, but since the 80s, it's been on a downward trend in terms of quality and often spewing arrogant remarks. That might only be in the USA division though. I've never used Red product and probably never will, but they seem more interested in user agreements than pleasing users. Also, they have horrible PR. Again, extremely arrogant. So, arrogance meets arrogance. I hope they can make something positive and useful of this.

I realize you like your Tamrons, but I imagine, being a rather open mount, we'll see a lot more. Anything Samyang, Tamron, or other will probably come out on L-mount. No reason why they wouldn't. I saw the Petapixel video. In low light, the AF was probably in contrast AF only mode- lots of jitters in the bokeh.

Invariably, the conversation goes to FF. Personally, I thought about that Sigma FP and Panasonic 28-200 (with IS). That combo seems super versatile now. Size-wise, the FP is the size of a mid-range MFT camera. The equivalent of the Panasonic lens would be a 14-100 f/2-2.8 zoom, which would be incredible. The package would come in at 830-ish grams. I've always thought this: if L-mount comes out with smaller pancakes and a few reasonably priced very small bodies, MFT would be on a path to obsolete. Until then, MFT cameras will continue to make decent strides in terms of features and at least on the used market, their prices continue to rise- the true indicator of a camera's value. On a side note, I'd wait because there have been reports on a small Panasonic camera is in the works. My bet is that it will have PDAF and some other decent features. This could be more than a year away though.

Not a single Olympus or OM System camera has dual ISO. None. Otherwise, the best Olympus camera for the size is the OM-5 or E-M5 iii.

It would seem a "small" camera doesn't exist without forgoing one of the items listed above. I agree with Matt. It would be the GH5S because IBIS isn't one of the things you listed.

Those cameras are a bit too big for me. I'm really hoping for a small 2/3 inch sensor with modern codecs and frame rates. I'd like sub 400g but happy with sub 500g. I'm thinking an enclosed LX10 lens with more reach and a sensor, processor, and battery slapped on the back. Something tells me that it should be possible.

Compact super zooms are great for their size. The only problem is they become fiddly and the zooms are never smooth. Also, they're much more prone to dust on the sensor which can basically ruin them. Camcorders have none of that, but they can have more issues in low light and they are bigger as you say; yet, they are made for video, not stills like the POS.

I think you're right when it comes to resale. A S1H would be more sought after than a camcorder and as such bring higher prices and less of a hit. That being said, if you were to have bought the S1H at launch, used it for 3-5 years, you'd lose 40-50% of the original purchase price, but you might have better content. The other big cost is the lenses which will also take a hit, unless you buy used to begin with. Of course the same could be said for the pro camcorder. IMO, if you buy upon release, use it for 3 years, the hit is always the biggest. I know that you buy used and very often. In most cases, you won't lose much, if any. I know I've even made money on a lot of my lenses and bodies. The only caveat is that it's almost like a 2nd job if you buy and sell yourself; hence MPB.

I would imagine there are a lot of wedding videographers out there with a S5ii/x and 2 HC-x2000 camcorders. It makes a lot of sense. You could probably get by with a f/2.8 zoom for your handheld shots and the camcorders set on tripods for any number of other shots. Codecs also seem to play nice with each other.

Just trying to be more realistic by not asking for the moon. Also, raw means more power and bigger body for the most part. Yet another benefit of the form factor. I sold all of mine, but there's something great about framing without having the camera on.

Yes. The modular approach is nice, but it starts looking like a Swiss army knife with all of its blades out. The beauty of the camcorder is when everything is one package. No add-ons, no matte box, no monitor, no cables, no SSD's, no follow focus system, no cage, no rails, etc. Pick up a camcorder, open the screen, hit record. You get a buttery smooth zoom, a detailed image with everything in-focus. Nice. I just want manufacturers to push the format a little more: slightly larger sensor, maybe even with less zoom better codecs like H.265 10bit or Prores, better touch screens with more definition a few tools like a waveform or a histogram

This has been a long story of ergonomics. Once manufacturers found a way to put super zooms in a small form-factor, it really complicated things as they weren't putting big sensors in them anymore. Along come the still cameras with rather crappy video specs but decent low-light and more ability for selective focus. What many of us want is the camcorder form-factor with a large sensor and a super zoom. Alas, the large size is the problem. It seems if you want selective focus on the wide end, you need a big camera. Essentially, holding a camcorder is like cradling a medium-sized lens with a screen attached to it as if you're getting communion at church. For me, as long as the weight is under control, I love it. With still cameras, you always end up fighting a downward pulling body with your left hand unless you also bring it to your eye. It's not bad, but camcorders are better for shooting at the hip IMO.