John Matthews

I just asked Gordon Laing of cameralabs.com about the focus pulling in this test video. It seemed to me that Panasonic is improving their algorithms... not perfect, but better when circumstances are right. This is what he said: "Well all the recent Lumix cameras whether MFT or fixed lens, have had DFD-profiling so their Af performance should share similar characteristics, at least where a lens can be driven the same way. But the bottom line is yes under the right situations, the focus pulling is hunting less, although as you'll see in some of my other clips, there can still be hunting visible."

Thanks for this information regarding the PDF. I'd looked some time ago, but found nothing. The Sony DMF mode works well. I briefly had a gx7 and it worked in a similar way with magnification. However, I found the peaking to be the best way to operate manual focus without losing the frame. IMO my RX100's peaking wasn't as good as the gx7... got to go; I have a lot of reading to do!

Ahh... I've now sold every camera I own (except a film era k1000) to afford this one. It appears to be the swiss army knife to photography and video making... looks to do everything well (not including sound) and nothing poorly. Apparently, I only need to figure out how to get ahold of one (earthquake rumors). Located in France, does anyone know where one could preorder from a reputable dealer?

That looks pretty good for something in-camera. I'm not sure if I'm going to be that organised to get this type of shot because it seems it needs to be very "pre-planned." And yes, it's missing the paralax, but still I thinks it's a cool creative option... especially the hand-held part.

All reports on this camera as the one to get for your intended use. I agree the Zoom H1 isn't the greatest, but it's a heck of deal for 100 bucks. I just use it on a boom stand 12-18 inches away or with a lav... seems to work well that way. It's got a cheap build though. The IBIS in this camera, from what I see from preproduction models, is quite good in static shots replacing a tripod or walking type shots. It removes micro jitters, but it doesn't do well in panning- seems to play catchup when moving a little too much. It might be optimised a little more when the production version is released. Another point is that with movement comes blur... 4k needed? Just saying... As for the stills, it will do great for my needs. Will it be the best? No. I think other cameras are better, but not leaps and bounds better. I would say single digit percentage better, not new category better. For that, people should be looking at medium format. Also, when was the last time you printed something bigger than A3? We're at a point in photography that the problem with most people's photos is not the camera. I include myself in that category.

Back in the day, I had a Pentax K5 and it had IBIS. You could hear it during operation, but somehow the camera suppressed it a little in its mono mic. From what we know about the sound on the gx80/85, it sounds like distant running water... a whirling sort of sound. I don't think we'll really know until it comes out. Maybe, they'll put some software to suppress that frequency in the camera. Panasonic might make us choose between shaky and silent or stable and noisy. Wait and see.

Yeah, I guess it can't hurt to at least tell them what we want, but I can't help thinking that there's some marketing "genius" at Panasonic grinning every time someone asks for some little change to a camera (especially in firmware). Isn't that the reason why they get people people to buy the latest and greatest? If they offered the "perfect" camera, they would have a tough time selling the next one. Still, there has been amazing progress on the video front in the past 5-10 years. Canon has a great marketing team! Who else can sell virtually the same product over and over to the masses without having to actually innovate. They're in a unique position. Like most Japanese companies, the boss is viewed as a "god." That means big mistakes can be made. Companies like Panasonic also seem more Japan-centric. If they do well in Japan, they probably think it's "good enough." Also, Panasonic is playing a different game than Canon. I think they're trying to convince people to move to their system whereas Canon is trying to convince people to stay in their system. One is harder than the other and Panasonic probably chooses to put their money in places where they feel makes the most impact. But, then again, who am I to say?

I thought this might be the case. I'm still curious with the gx80 as it's the first AA-free filter sensor from Panasonic and the Venus engine. I'm sure it's going to increase the difficulty in removing moiré. Then again, we probably shouldn't be too obsessed with that. I'm not sure if it would matter for this model as they've already started manufacturing. Also, I'm sure they're aware of what we want and I'm also sure they were very careful about what they didn't include in this camera. I think they don't want the only reason for why you would buy a GH5 to be ergonomics and a couple more picture profiles. Still, telling them to include a 30 cent microphone jack probably can't hurt... especially considering the flawed sound from the GX80/85.

Yes, something rather "cheeky" in her look, to use a British expression. So far, the only concerns I've had about this camera are: 1) Lack of Microphone (just use external recorder) 2) IBIS potentially ruins audio (again, just use external recorder) 3) Potentially, the lack off AA filter could lead to more moiré. I'm just not sure on how this will translate into video and exactly how much Panasonic modified their Venus engine to manage it. Pixel-peep on this photo of a pre-production release to see what I mean (look at the subject's right arm): https://www.magezinepublishing.com/equipment/images/equipment/Lumix-GX80-6097/highres/Panasonic-Lumix-GX80-Detail-P1050537_1459799772.jpg I took the photo into Lightroom and fixed it easily. I just hope the Venus engine can do the same in processing.

From what I gather, the IBS ruins the in-body sound; so, you're only left with the option of off-camera sound. I've got a Zoom H1 and I plan on using it to the fullest with this camera. It's a cumbersome process to keep track of the audio and matching video files, but I find that if I do it immediately after sooting, it works. So far, I've sold off a bunch of gear too... only my RX100 to go. Last month, I had bought a GX7 (before sending it back because the GX80/85 appeared) and just loved the combo of the GX7's Natural profile and an easy grading option of film convert. With the FZ300, Panasonic really gives you everything but a large sensor; however, I'd trade the microphone input for a large sensor, pocket-ability and the interchangeable lenses any day. The GX80 is going to be a great option for off-the-cuff style shots and possibly more serious projects too- a great allrounder. Some will say not an A camera, but in the right hands, it could be.

It looks as though Martin Wallgren shot another video showing off the IBS (with the Panasonic 15mm). Cute video with seemingly great stabilisation. https://www.instagram.com/p/BE3qDpYknMs/ Looks good to me! For me, this is the camera to get, even if it doesn't have a microphone input.

It's got the shake of a Digital Bolex 16 with a c-mount nikon adapter?

(Scene 1 & 2) Camera A, (Scene 3) Camera B I'm going to say the Panasonic GM1. It's a little soft. A little moiré on your sweatshirt and a little soft. It has nice colors though. (Scene 1 & 2) Camera B, (Scene 3) Camera A I guess the BlackMagic Pocket Cinema Camera. More DOF. Better DR and sharper, but this one confused me on Scene 3- could be wrong. I also happen to also know that you have both of these cameras. There's my logic, but I could be wrong. Thank you for you enthusiasm and effort on your youtube videos. Love the channel.