Happy Daze

It's easy to assume that this current trend for media consumption and social media is going to continue ad-infinitum, but I think people will eventually tire of this and move on. This is the case for most trends which in the scheme of things are comparatively short lived. Everything goes full circle, people will get bored and move on to something else. Hopefully new opportunities will present themselves at some point in the future. Or, it will all turn to shit. (Just covering my ass).

I posted this video to DPR over 3 years ago: In this thread: hxxps://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4560524 Caused all kinds of shit. The thread appears to be open again now but it was locked for some time and a lot of the replies have been deleted. Some people actually took the title seriously and obviously didn't bother watching the video, man were they pissed!

I film a lot of clips for stock here in the UK, and it's quite simple to determine if you need model or property release. Here is a reasonable explanation from Shutterstock: "The simple answer to the difference between commercial and editorial content is how that content is permitted to be used. What classifies an image, clip, or illustration as commercial or editorial is slightly more complex, but understanding the difference is very important as it will inform how you photograph, film, or illustrate your next project and how that content can be licensed. Content that is licensed for commercial use has many more restrictions than content that is licensed for editorial use because commercial content is used for advertising and promotional purposes. For commercial content, permission is required from property owners, artists, and recognizable people in the image, whereas editorial content does not because this content is used for the public good via news outlets." If someone enters your shot and you can't reshoot it then you should have a model release on hand and perhaps explain what you are doing. They may be happy to give their permission and sign the release.

There's another quality that rarely gets discussed. The lens I used was a 75mm with a squeeze factor of 1.6x that has an equivalent field of view of about 47mm. You get the compression of a 75mm lens but a wider field of view, a quality you can feel whilst filming but can't quite put your finger on what it is. It's like taking multiple landscapes with a telephoto lens and then stitching them together, it changes the compression and look of DOF in comparison to a scene shot with a wider lens. I guess the higher the squeeze factor the more noticeable this would become. Beyond the other well known attributes, this compression adds a quality to shooting anamorphic that can be quite inspiring when looking through the viewfinder, ordinary scenes have a certain feel that I've not experienced with spherical lenses. It's something that needs to be experienced. I'm actively trying to source a different lens that perhaps does not exhibit the same artifacts that was present in this example. The 1.6x squeeze was perfect for me and shooting in 3:2 resulted in an aspect ratio of 2.4:1 which I love, sadly the are very few lenses that fit the bill (that i can afford at least).

In my short experience of shooting anamorphic on the BMCC 6KFF at a 1.6x squeeze in open gate 3:2 I found that detail increases a great deal when the video is rendered in 4K. The resultant video is 2.4:1 at 3840 x 1600, and if you think about it, you take the horizontal resolution down to 3840 from 6048 a scaling factor of 1.575 whilst the vertical resolution reduces from 4032 to 1600 with a factor of 2.52. that's a better scaling factor than filming in 8K 2.4:1 7680 x 3200 and rendering at 4K which of course has a scaling factor of just 2 on the vertical axis. There is plenty of information to play with and you can achieve Incredible detail. My first test video: The main issue in my opinion is correcting for distorted uprights and awful bokeh, not necessarily in distance objects but most certainly in out of focus areas in front of the subject which can look very ugly and it's made to look worse by the fact that the resolution is so good. There are a couple of examples in clips from the video below. That's why I returned this anamorphic lens, not because of a lack of resolution as that was fantastic.

Surprisingly the Pocket 3 also has a 1 inch sensor.

When you place clips in a Davinci Resolve timeline you have the option save the used media in the original format (not re-encoded) either complete or split as per the edited clip. When saving the cut clip there is also a choice to add frame handles to both ends of the clip to a selectable length. It can then automatically replace the clips in the timeline with the newly saved trimmed versions. It works for BRAW files as well as standard mov, MP4 etc, but I've not tried it with other raw formats. Certainly saves a lot of storage space and time splitting clips individually. It also gives the opportunity to re-encode the clips before saving them if that is your desire. It's in the file menu under 'Media Management...'

Good decision! Think your going to love it. It feels like quality in the hands which adds to the experience. Let us know how you get on.

If your looking at used S1, make sure it has the vlog upgrade or you'll need to figure that into the cost. Between the S1 and S5 I have both and prefer the S1, the full size HDMI will one day serve you well if you want to shoot RAW. If you haven't held either then visit somewhere that will let you experience the difference, the S1 is solid and feels reassuring but it is heavier which for me is a preference. The S1 viewfinder is more than twice the resolution and a joy to use. Both are great cameras but for me the S1 stands out. Good luck.

Genius! Potentially, sell you a camera with faults or intentional omissions in firmware and then sell you a subscription to fix it, why didn't I think of that?

A hazelnut? I know this one: Squirrel shit! Is this off topic?

Don't need to buy anything this year, I have more cameras than talent. Unless of course Blackmagic or Panasonic release an L mount 8K. That will help take my lack of talent to whole new levels and will be more clearly defined.

That was an interesting read and I enjoyed your demo reel, thanks.

24p. We like it because our brains have been programmed for it. Someone growing up with their first experience in movies at 60p will look at old movies in the future and think that 24p looks weird and disjointed.

Good news. Pleased you've got it sorted.