lucabutera

The news that I can find are those that you can find in the internet, the Samsung is at the center of a corruption investigation, the big boss is in a coma in 2014 and his son to get the maximum power resulting from the merger with other companies, it seems that he corrupted the president of Korea. Samsung has never released an official statement of closure of their cameras, they were told they had to move resources toward smartphone department, and that's exactly what they did. The Samsung is a giant that moves 7% of the GDP of Korea and has to make money, but they are also very proud and competitive environments, each product is built to be the best of the competition.

I think you're right, thanks for your patience! Does not exist a version 1 and version 2, each NXL is an evolution of the previous one, who has more patience will have a product tested and improved.

Yes!

Yes, the currently version in crowdfunding which is in production will be the V2.

I Spent many nights to create the NXL, I started with a vision and with the contribution of all those who have bought and tried I could improve it. The boards of all were useful, I alone could not test it with all the lenses and detect the defects, a project carried out in crowdfunding is this. To answer your question, I must tell you that in reality this would be the Mark XXX version, but I prefer to stick to the NXL version. Currently, the construction costs are very high because it has made in Italy and in a limited number of pieces, so I can not reduce the price, but it remains a good investment given the rarity of the piece, maybe will be revaluated as anamorphic lenses. ALSO I AM SURE THAT SAMSUNG RESUME PRODUCTION OF CAMERAS JUST HAVE INTERNAL PROBLEMS SOLVED AND REORGANIZED THEIR COMPANY.

I found the problem to vignetting with telephotos. I can solve it! Thank you for your reporting @ttbek.

Do you try to shot in 640x480 in vga or mjpeg to see if the problem is the bitrate?

This is possible, each lens has a different design in its interior. I have never encountered this problem. Have you tried the lens with Canon 5Ds? No problem vignetting with it? Canon 5D MKIII VS Samsung NX1 + NXL (Cropping Test)!

https://www.produzionidalbasso.com/project/samsung-nx-camera-to-full-frame-with-nxl-adapter/ This is strange, I test it with 70-200 Canon, you've tried to remove the lens hood?

What you say is correct, but all the programs that I use to eliminate macroblocking and artifacts, blur the image to "soften" the color, this algorithm instead also recovers the definition lost by the compression. Certainly it is hard to think of a recovery of 4.4.4 sampling but have a more realistic 4.2.2 would not hurt!

In the review of Enna, in the image of comparison it is very visible the difference in Deep of field between the cup with the flower in the foreground and behind the plate and glass. That shot with NXL is very similar to Full Frame look.

Hello. Someone says he wrote a program to rebuild color sampling 4.2.0 in a real 4.4.4. I'm not a programmer or hackers, or anyone good as @ottok or @kinoseed can see better what is it? Thank you https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=173005&page=6 https://github.com/Khanattila/KNLMeansCL/releases

Thank you all! If today some of us have a chance to see samsung nx1 with full frame eye is thanks to your financial support.

The price of Kinemax has increased a lot, but there is always the option of buying an excellent BM Ursa!

But Gh5 shoot in burst mode h265 6k 10bit 4.2.2 with Metabones speed booster it's as aps-c sensor, but no cheap solution.....

Samsung start with Pentax K mount! Maybe the code is the same? http://www.lesnumeriques.com/appareil-photo-numerique/pourquoi-samsung-a-t-quitte-photo-alors-qu-faisait-partie-plus-innovants-a3005.html

This month has been terrible for shipments. I had some parts still in customs for almost a month, only yesterday they passed through customs! Pictures by @carlic

Sorry @kisaha, NXL is not a clothing!! :-)

Hello John, yes the NXL it's available for puchase.

@Otto K experience about this?

I know, the flange focal distance in Canon VL mount is 20mm on Canon Eos-M is 18, we have 2mm to make adapter, this will be slim like a Nikon/Eos approx, but the minor distance is better to reduce vignetting, because the rear glass of lens is near the sensor and cover more the corner of the sensor. The electric pin will be the next step after test. p.s. I wait to see your video shooting with NXL turbo booster! Marry Christmas.

Ok. Certainly build a mute adapter for Canon EF lenses Canon VL-M body is theoretically possible (I have to check the diameters and graft rear overhang). This could result in vignetting, Sure that Canon lens is not able to cover the aps-c sensor (No one has tried this before). Then you can assess whether it is possible to communicate the camera with the lens and if it is worth investing time and money on this interesting project.

This lens is near to MFT sensor but is possible try this crazy experiment! You can use this combination VL Lens -> VL Eos adapter -> Eos to Eos-M smart adapter -> Eos-M camera. But I do not the final result as well.

I send NXL as a letter, so as not to pay customs duties!