gt3rs

You can also change focus, use it to do rack focusing and so on. With the 1dx ii wifi adapter the lag and refresh rates were quite ok maybe 15-20 fps or so. I did use it a couple of time on a cablecam to monitor while piloting the gimbal. With the 1dx iii internal wifi seems much slower and the lag is much bigger it is ok to control the camera but not good for monitoring.

The cool thing about using bluetooth is that is not affecting the battery that much. So it works like this: you open the app it connects via bluetooth to the camera and tell the camera to turn on wifi and then you are prompted by the app to join the wifi. So I always have Bluetooth on but wifi off in the camera... it just takes a bit more time to connect but is a good solution imo

Imo there is no marked for video dedicated camera below 4k usd it cost too much to produce vs the margin and quantity. The only way is reusing body etc. so there will be no more XC or maybe not even C100.... either will be photo camera with powerful video capability (Canon strategy) or modified version (Panasonic strategy).

Currently no Canon camera either DSLR or C line offers RAW in resolutions below the sensor wide. So a 8k sensor will be 8k RAW only, 5.5K will 5.5K RAW and so on.... So I don't expect any DSLR with 4K RAW from Canon at the moment.... The above is pure speculation.... I would not rule out 4k 10bit... probably no RAW if they go SD card only....

I find the 5.5k RAW quicker than 4k 10bit h265 in Resolve Studio on a PC.....

Looking at the images in the dpreview gallery the mavic air II is IMO worst than the mini for photo quality.... all the YouTube "looking only at the spec" reviewers they don't talk about this but it is disappointing. Air 2 sample gallery: https://***URL removed***/samples/8448062815/dji-mavic-air-2-sample-gallery Mini sample gallery: https://***URL removed***/sample-galleries/3706845764/dji-mavic-mini-sample-gallery

Nope is this https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1433719-REG/canon_mount_adapter_ef_rf_with.html other than a huge vignetting.... and some aps-c lens hitting the vND filter in the adapter I see no issue😉 Why would you want to mount an aps-c lens on a 8k FF? If the camera will offer video in cropped mode too or alternatively you crop the 8k in post then you could use a aps-c still not sure why...

I’m really not sure it make sense to have dslr specific for video... Panasonic is the only really focusing in this part of the market but they don‘t have many cinema camera and are basically nowhere in the photo world. Canon is trying to add as much video features in their normal photo camera lineup and to me for a R & D prospective it makes more sense. Is Sony still committed to special video centric dslr? I’m not so sure

On the Pi the max video recoding seems 1080p. On Pi 4 via usb 3 you could connect a ssd so saving on storage would be possible. I believe the CSI is 4 Gbits/s so if I did the math right it should fit 12bit x 12mpix x 24fps not sure if the CSI is the bottle neck.

16k 360 camera with perfect stitching and great stabilization same size as insta360 one r. Ideally with eND and 100fps....

Mounting on a bike or motorbike? On a bike like an MTB is a challenge as it gives tons of vibrations so especially with non wide-angle it will be a mess. Not sure what you have in mind but I did some experimentation to mount a DSLR on a e-bike with a Ronin S to film galloping horse but without a insulation (shock absorber) mount it is not too good. In comparison on a onewheel handholding the ronin s is super smooth problem is that 25 km/h is too slow for a galloping horse 😉 A 360 camera with the great stabilization works quite ok mounted on the bike directly but then is even more super wide....

I did a quick try and only one work at a time... the last that you connect wins. Resolution seems camera dependent: 1DxIII 1280x720, M6 II: 1024x756. Compared to FullHD web cameras the quality is much better with the DSLR but nothing surprising here. It would be nice that would be FullHD for the 1dx III and 720p for M6 II... also would be cool multi cameras also would be very helpful to be able to Record in camera.... the EOS utility allows this so it is theoretically possible View that there seems quite a bit of buzz around this maybe they will invest more and improve it. Sigma implementation seems much better

Insta360 4k and 1 inch modules c200, c300 iii, c500 ii, c700, c700ff sony fx9, venice and probably others most REDs many phones phantom 4 pro, mavic air ii, mavic 2? Inspire x?

1Dx iii and my pc both are usb 3.0. I would guess you can have multiple ones.... if I have time I will try.

Are you trying to record via the atomos or just using it as a monitor. I use quite regularly a monitor and I have no problem recoding in camera 5.5k 60fps RAW while monitoring on the external monitor "fullhd". If you are using it as a monitor only did you try to set the HDMI resolution on the 1Dx III to 1080p to se if it works?

It is 1280 x 720 at list on my quick test. Also you cannot record on the camera while active as webcam... Would have been cool to use it as "reserve" monitor. You can use the EOS Utility as monitor but I'm not a fan of the canon UI. But still good that they finally offer this feature.

I did downscale in PS to 12MP and also did some post test but still not impressed. I did take a look at the video and that seems quite good.

Download the dng pictures from this thread: https://mavicpilots.com/threads/mavic-air-2-sample-photos-and-videos.86461/ but I'm not impressed I would like to the see the 12 Mpix dng because these 48 Mpix tricks brings nothing at least with this samples..... did not check the video yet

Looks quite cool, I sold my P4Pro a month ago as is big and very noise and it becomes more and more a problem also with people complaining with these "big" drone. The photo and video quality of the P4p are quite good compared to the size. The idea was to replace it with the Air II that has probably not the same image quality but closing in but much smaller and lighter. But now with all this regulation here, registration above 250g, max 120m altitude, line of sight etc... I'm wonder if for the b-roll stuff a mavic mini will not be good enough, now that they have manual WB and manual exposure... I whish they would have also add sharpness, contrast etc. settings (not sure if it has it or not but it seems not).

I think they should have a FW with middle codec on the C200 and 1 year from now it will be at that price level.... why crating a new model, new manual, new accessories etc... for a C200 without RAW but with 10bit make not too much sense in term of R&D..... Only point to do a new model is for whatever reason the HW of C200 cannot do 4k10bit in whatever codec....

Yes this is why S1H is there and C200 not

I saw that and it could be something but it is heavy and another piece... also did not find something equivalent here in switzerland at a good price. Ideally they should include the AC power in the same price of the SLB60w

No Time Code input no Netflix. Even the C200 is not there due to this.

I'm looking for some cheap and portable led lights. For bigger things I will rent. I was comparing SLB60w vs Forza 60 as they have similar prices and features: SLB60w advantages: + No cables, a simple one block solution + Bowens mount (no adapted needed) - Reflector less powerful and optimized than the Forza 60 - Proprietary Battery - Expensive AC adapter (cost almost as a SL60w) Forza 60 advantages: + Can be powered by AC included or battery via D-Tap custom cable or has Sony battery adapter. V Mount battery can be used for other things and will last more that the Godox + More brightness thanks to the better reflector + Smaller and less weight on the stand - Not sure but it seems a bit less bright in bar-bulb - Bowens mount via adapter - Power adapter + block instead of a single item - More expensive if you include the battery and charger Anyone has experience with one of them?

No there he can land easily... In this one we manage to take 3 attempts before he missed and he was in the lake😂