gt3rs

Why would not be possible as camera makers know exactly the RS plus lens data etc so they could. Anything done by external software would be possible internally assuming enough cpu power.

Afaik EIS also using gyro, canon, gopro, insta etc....

If you would use the camera for sport/action photography 1dx III is probably a better choice. For mostly video I would wait and check the R5. I normally have 2 1Dx (current and previous gen) but I now only have 1Dx III and planning to get the R5 as for remote 12fps mechanical is more than enough and don't need the best af tracking lag free shutter etc.... The R5 can or could be better than the 1Dx for video in the following: - It will have zebra - 4k 120 fps even if it is line skipping or binning it will be better that the 1080 120fps of the 1Dx (that is not great) - flippy screen! - EVF - 8K can become handy to punch in reframe etc.. - pretty sure it will be cheaper 1Dx is better: - RAW in 50, 60fps - 5.5k RAW (smaller) and easier to edit than 8k RAW - longer battery life - dual card same type (can record 4k 10bit proxy in one card and RAW in the other one, not sure) Unknowns - video quality (1Dx III 5.5 and 4k super sampled is really good) - rolling shutter - DR - DPAF performance

1Dx iii FF 5.5 at 50 and 60 has a rolling shutter < 16.6ms not sure why at 24,25,30 is higher maybe due to dpaf or whatever reason. The rolling shutter in any crop mode 24,25,30,50,60 and FF 50,60 fps is the same or very similar and quite good (ca 16ms). FF 24,25 and 30 is very noticeable. Did not measure it but just went through all of them doing quick swipe pans.

only 4:2:0... 4:2:2 is not HW accelerated so you need a powerful cpu......

I normally use 24 fps timeline (some time if is for tv 25 fps I'm a PAL country). I use the following settings: Motion Estimation always Better, Motion Ra... depends how big are movements so either small, medium or large and then I play with the Motion Blur slider until I find the spot that looks good. Again it will never be the same as real as some motion are very complex. I should try to do a repeatable test with 180° and one with 1/250 and 1/500 + motion blur in post.

I'm experimenting a bit like this using high SS and adding motion blur back as I have sometime the requirement to have photo and video at the same time. I also use remotes for photo but still would be nice to combine both so kind of compromise SS 1/250 or so... The motion estimation of Resolve is not too bad, is not like the real thing but it can fool non critical eyes. I also add motion blur for time shifts or with 360 camera where there are no NDs.... I did also experiment a bit using 5.5k 60 fps and slowing down in Resolve like it was done 120fps and not always but many times the result is much better than 1080p 120fps of the 1Dx The EIS in the 1Dx III with wide-angle lens and higher SS works quite well especially if you are not running around or so. Slowly moving works quite well but definitely not like on a Gimbal.

You can also change focus, use it to do rack focusing and so on. With the 1dx ii wifi adapter the lag and refresh rates were quite ok maybe 15-20 fps or so. I did use it a couple of time on a cablecam to monitor while piloting the gimbal. With the 1dx iii internal wifi seems much slower and the lag is much bigger it is ok to control the camera but not good for monitoring.

The cool thing about using bluetooth is that is not affecting the battery that much. So it works like this: you open the app it connects via bluetooth to the camera and tell the camera to turn on wifi and then you are prompted by the app to join the wifi. So I always have Bluetooth on but wifi off in the camera... it just takes a bit more time to connect but is a good solution imo

Imo there is no marked for video dedicated camera below 4k usd it cost too much to produce vs the margin and quantity. The only way is reusing body etc. so there will be no more XC or maybe not even C100.... either will be photo camera with powerful video capability (Canon strategy) or modified version (Panasonic strategy).

Currently no Canon camera either DSLR or C line offers RAW in resolutions below the sensor wide. So a 8k sensor will be 8k RAW only, 5.5K will 5.5K RAW and so on.... So I don't expect any DSLR with 4K RAW from Canon at the moment.... The above is pure speculation.... I would not rule out 4k 10bit... probably no RAW if they go SD card only....

I find the 5.5k RAW quicker than 4k 10bit h265 in Resolve Studio on a PC.....

Looking at the images in the dpreview gallery the mavic air II is IMO worst than the mini for photo quality.... all the YouTube "looking only at the spec" reviewers they don't talk about this but it is disappointing. Air 2 sample gallery: https://***URL removed***/samples/8448062815/dji-mavic-air-2-sample-gallery Mini sample gallery: https://***URL removed***/sample-galleries/3706845764/dji-mavic-mini-sample-gallery

Nope is this https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1433719-REG/canon_mount_adapter_ef_rf_with.html other than a huge vignetting.... and some aps-c lens hitting the vND filter in the adapter I see no issue😉 Why would you want to mount an aps-c lens on a 8k FF? If the camera will offer video in cropped mode too or alternatively you crop the 8k in post then you could use a aps-c still not sure why...

I’m really not sure it make sense to have dslr specific for video... Panasonic is the only really focusing in this part of the market but they don‘t have many cinema camera and are basically nowhere in the photo world. Canon is trying to add as much video features in their normal photo camera lineup and to me for a R & D prospective it makes more sense. Is Sony still committed to special video centric dslr? I’m not so sure

On the Pi the max video recoding seems 1080p. On Pi 4 via usb 3 you could connect a ssd so saving on storage would be possible. I believe the CSI is 4 Gbits/s so if I did the math right it should fit 12bit x 12mpix x 24fps not sure if the CSI is the bottle neck.

16k 360 camera with perfect stitching and great stabilization same size as insta360 one r. Ideally with eND and 100fps....

Mounting on a bike or motorbike? On a bike like an MTB is a challenge as it gives tons of vibrations so especially with non wide-angle it will be a mess. Not sure what you have in mind but I did some experimentation to mount a DSLR on a e-bike with a Ronin S to film galloping horse but without a insulation (shock absorber) mount it is not too good. In comparison on a onewheel handholding the ronin s is super smooth problem is that 25 km/h is too slow for a galloping horse 😉 A 360 camera with the great stabilization works quite ok mounted on the bike directly but then is even more super wide....

I did a quick try and only one work at a time... the last that you connect wins. Resolution seems camera dependent: 1DxIII 1280x720, M6 II: 1024x756. Compared to FullHD web cameras the quality is much better with the DSLR but nothing surprising here. It would be nice that would be FullHD for the 1dx III and 720p for M6 II... also would be cool multi cameras also would be very helpful to be able to Record in camera.... the EOS utility allows this so it is theoretically possible View that there seems quite a bit of buzz around this maybe they will invest more and improve it. Sigma implementation seems much better

Insta360 4k and 1 inch modules c200, c300 iii, c500 ii, c700, c700ff sony fx9, venice and probably others most REDs many phones phantom 4 pro, mavic air ii, mavic 2? Inspire x?

1Dx iii and my pc both are usb 3.0. I would guess you can have multiple ones.... if I have time I will try.

Are you trying to record via the atomos or just using it as a monitor. I use quite regularly a monitor and I have no problem recoding in camera 5.5k 60fps RAW while monitoring on the external monitor "fullhd". If you are using it as a monitor only did you try to set the HDMI resolution on the 1Dx III to 1080p to se if it works?

It is 1280 x 720 at list on my quick test. Also you cannot record on the camera while active as webcam... Would have been cool to use it as "reserve" monitor. You can use the EOS Utility as monitor but I'm not a fan of the canon UI. But still good that they finally offer this feature.

I did downscale in PS to 12MP and also did some post test but still not impressed. I did take a look at the video and that seems quite good.

Download the dng pictures from this thread: https://mavicpilots.com/threads/mavic-air-2-sample-photos-and-videos.86461/ but I'm not impressed I would like to the see the 12 Mpix dng because these 48 Mpix tricks brings nothing at least with this samples..... did not check the video yet