Vladimir

im in. this is from 1.6x scope, first test with 50f2:

xt2/konica40f1.8/noname speedbooster - its really compact and have a good speed.

still running and gunning with my pocketsize handheld setup (100fps fw update is all i needed )

i've been using it with canon 28/1.8 here on a shots with dancing girl and couple of other: and it did pretty well, also totally ok for photo. Although i have a minor glitch before i updated firmware to latest version.

Because a work of a whole crew looks silly in compare with one man bts ( I have no other explanations))

Not gonna happen) here's compare my bts and a video that already complete: https://youtu.be/9-m-yoC6i1I - Alexa mini/Ronin, operator, fpuller, mechanic and a director on w/less monitor And my humble bts, that was presented to client in 360p quality) https://vimeo.com/293635505 Also thx for all your comments guys, i'm really suffering in lack of reaction on my works)

And again it's gonna be better than actual music video)

penis camera look like a serious product now

if not pleased with just 1080/15p ive heard they're workin on a series of internal-external recorders for more advanced shooters

nikkor 55/1.2 with/without speedbooster

true, aliasing is bad, so im shooting with fast [soft] lenses wide open, 360° and as you said adding a lot of grain (i like it anyway)) over original noise. not suited for clean work but to catch a moment its enough for me. here is another example of 100fps but with xh1; theres a lot of red so watch in 2160 quality (yeah its funny chosing 2160 option to watch 720-like footage but its YT compression bbe )):

konica 40/1.8 and cheap noname speedbooster (and a little of machining work). most probably highest iso is 1600 (since i dont do post nr), maybe 3200 in one or two shots.

decide yourself ) (shot this handheld with xt2)

what a bs to ask a regular people to judge artistic instrument which bokeh is. people care about content and what an idiotic ( and impotent ) thing to let them decide which tool is better for creator.