TwoScoops

Wish the failure the trashcan MP was would actually reflect in used ebay prices. lol

Really good news!

https://www.hdvideopro.com/blog/sundance-2015-shooting-knock-knock-with-a-canon-1d-c/ Just trolling. I know what you meant. . .

Nikon mirrorless wish = raw, with the same malleability as the D750's raw stills. (not like they have a cinema line to protect)

Another vimeo find. BMMCC + 1.5x scope.

I agree, this is a huge part of it! 1DC, BM, 5D Raw all have that in common and are considered to be good in this area.

I actually edited that after I posted. But those run out quickly. I've used them on photo shoots. Not very cheap if you're doing take after take. . .

that does look really GH4 CiniDish.

when he says real haze, he means from a haze machine (more expensive than smoke machine), or some of that photography haze spray. I'd guess the former... cheap way to attempt that look is Tiffen's Smoque filter.

I was talking about the first video as far as cellphone, not the low light. Maybe I'm wrong but that video doesn't make me want to spend 2k+ on it.

^ yeah. Besides teh focal length, going from the feel, those Gh5s vids could honestly just as easily be really good cellphone video.

I remember reading the ASC guideline for how fast you should pan 90 degrees is something insanely slow (like a minute or more.) This rule was around in the film days, so it's a digital thing, but someone new might think their fast pans looking strobey = the cameras fault. Obv some still handle it worse though.

^ I've wondered about trying that. Has anyone exported CR2/NEF from LR as a DNG then opened in Resolve?

There is no 4K micro cinema.

^ Quite fap-worthy, if true...

Found this on vimeo. It's probably been posted before but this is really nice from the BMMCC.

I definitely agree in the states. In UK/Europe seems like a much bigger discrepancy in the price.

How do the cheapo Chinese monitors like Feelworld compare to the SmallHD?

Maybe I'm just being facetious but the colours/skintones in Northrup's vedeos look terrible.

I think the Voigts are just as sharp at f2.8 to f4. I did some tests when I had them vs the Pana 12-35 and they looked about the same at 2.8, but still a lot nicer colors, more 3D pop etc. Definitely agree below f2 and really soft at 0.95 tho. Really great for portraits wide open.

I have owned the Voigts in the past and am well aware of the differences in still and cine lenses, my man! I was just asking which you preferred the look of.

I remember you commenting on using the Voigts in the past, are the Veydras better? I loved the 17.5 and 42.5 Voigt...

Probably a D750 replacement, which means I should sell mine before it drops further.

How long can you get on 128/256 cards in 14-bit?