Jump to content

Dr. Verbel'

Members
  • Posts

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dr. Verbel'

  1. Credits to Frank Ladner https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChWCqVp4OYzofwZyvxprDWg . Thread on eos I posted on earlier messages.
  2. Some photos of current construction. Beautiful body for single focus in progress.
  3. No problem. Make drawings for your case, 3d-print frames and mounts for your configuration. You may also add bellows. Necessary before printing CHECKS all sizes to fit your lens and mount for your configuration. 3D complete filling for printing. For frames solid plastic (ABS), for mount more plastic plastic (HIPS)
  4. Hi! Bellows on Amazon unsuitable for your lenses, too small. What model and sizes of lenses? That structure good for you?
  5. artiswar, for 2-4 (2-3m) 9 cm / ‪3,543307‬ inch
  6. Early test single focus for 35NAP... and for any bulky big projector lenses. Credits goes to this thread
  7. Caution! WD-40 may ingrained between the cemented lenses... on the pic died lens from another Rectimascop 80/2x. It is not a pity, because she was so dead from fungus. But the possibility may be after WD-40. Maybe yes, maybe no...
  8. Hmmm... You must unscrew this first. p.s. I was able to help than...
  9. Yes. Only side screw, which lock front ring. Then unscrew counterclockwise ring and all, finita la commedia!
  10. Hmmmm... man with the same 35nap 2-3 told me, that he easy unscrew back ring. he unscrew counterclockwise internal ring and pulled back the lens... Is a side screws on the body?.. Maybe he tell something wrong with which ring unscrewing, internal or external, but now he make construction as my with his removed lenses :-) Do you got front lens?
  11. Heavy, but cheapest :-) I have Rectimascop 80/2x, lenses very heavy in comparison with 35nap 2-3m. Front lens in cutted frame 900 g, rear 560 g. But light streaks very cool and very sharp from left to right. Number? I measured diameter rear lens of 80/2x, 80 mm. Your guess maybe right
  12. If I'm not mistaken, you have 35nap 2-3, LOMO version. Construction of body must be similar to 35nap 2-4 (also LOMO version). Must be small hole on the frame's side, in which small screw lock big nut. One man also have this version and send to me several photos. Right version? may try internal nut. later man tell me exactly.
  13. no problem, I live now on this forum small hole on the side - frame from 35nap 2-4. if you have 35nap 2-3m as I think, fisrt - leave lenses in frames from body. Then leave lenses from frames much easier.
  14. 35nap 2-2 smaller than 35nap 2-3m. Weight you see... front lens around 500 g, rear 370 g. 35nap 2-3m lenses in sum near 1 kg
  15. Justin Bacle, do you have the same 35nap 2-3m, as on photo? I'm interested, which logo on it (on the left side). Different factories in USSR produce these lenses with same name 35nap 2-3m. Little differences in body construction. Do you saw small hole on the frame's side? small screw lock big nut.
  16. Juank, bless you! In my case weighed design 1.7 kg / 3.75 lb‬ . Lenses in rims weigh around 1 kg / 2.2 lb. In your case I don't know, but I think, lighter than now. Double focus, but ready for work.
  17. Hi! Yes! I think, it will work with any bulky anamorphic projector lenses. You must carefully remove the lens first. if they are not folding rims, and then leave. Make a drawing frames to suit your lens and configuration. Print a 3D-model and everything is ready. Adjustments of lenses in my video with English subs (first configuration, not so easy construction, but ready to work also) at 14:02
  18. I have lens spanner. not strong for tight nut, but if on slightly choppy to unwind, you can unscrew
  19. Who want to buy budget anamorphic like on the photo, welcome to message box.
  20. Short video. 35NAP 2-3M (mod) | Helios 44-2 | Sony A6300 | 4K More Photos: http://s13.ru/archives/154581
×
×
  • Create New...