webrunner5

This is the one you Really want and need LoL. It has the manual clutch which is great for video. Used they aren't that bad. But no OIS. https://www.amazon.com/Olympus-M-ZUIKO-DIGITAL-12-40mm-Interchangeable/dp/B00EY3YGBS

Panny 12-35mm f2.8 is close to it. https://***URL removed***/reviews/panasonic-12-35-2p8

10-Bit, 4.2.0 is not considered Broadcast Quality. Main reason is because of poorer Chroma Subsampling. Yeah the Fuji X-T3 rings a lot of bells but I don't consider it as good of a Video money making tool as a GH5, GH5s is. For all around a X-T3 is pretty good as a user camera. https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/57460/chroma-subsampling

Yeah s35 is pretty much known to be a 1.5 crop of FF 35mm.

Anyone that uploads a 10 hour video of White Noise needs to be put down, let alone sued!

That Variable ND that Sony has on the FS5, FS7 mk II is a feature that is hard to beat also.

Looks like it was really shot using a Drone. Translates to "Spectacular wedding in Avila with drone". Could be a big ass drone carrying a Canon C700 for all I know but.. LoL.

Well going by the comments on DPR you ought to be glad you are canceling it. https://***URL removed***/samples/8942280679/panasonic-lx100-ii-sample-gallery?utm_source=self-desktop&utm_medium=marquee&utm_campaign=traffic_source

Sounds like you need a Atomos Ninja V. I think it has just about everything under the sun except SDI's.

Why does a C100 look so good with a on paper total crap Codec? They always seem behind, but are sort of ahead. Doesn't make much sense to be honest. ?

Sounds good. Yeah never known as a low light beast. That ought to help no doubt.

Well I will say it is...Different LoL. Good look to it though.

Yeah but it is missing the 3 big things you need to have, Waveform, RGB parade, Vectorscope.

I can see where you had to take 12 hours to do it. Lots of setups, camera angles, re takes. Technically impressive, but just too violent for me to be honest. Sort of brings back memories I would rather forget. But you warned people. NP.

I send you and email of it everyday just to piss you off. Cheers.

Review of the Atomos V on DPR. https://***URL removed***/videos/7928879592/dpreview-tv-atomos-ninja-v-review

Thats pretty funny coming from you.

Well the guy told me he used one lens, a somewhat cheap one, and a Smoke Machine. I guess it was that damn Smoke that made it happen. ? I have talked to him several times on Facebook where I met him. He is a damn talented guy. And your right, if your good, your shit is good, hmm, I have to go now... ? https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Kallie+Skys

Now it was Shot in Raw. I talked to the guy that did it. I am just trying to prove that Even a cheap ass BMPCC can look better than a GH5s. Panny GH5, GH5s doesn't have Raw, may Never get it. The PK4 has it now, and when the B Raw thingy comes to it, like has been said, game over.

Great, I will send you a Cookie!

We are talking one persons Grading ability. I would not bet the farm on your statement. ? There is no way you are Ever going to get this look, I have it posted it earlier, shot on a BMPCC, the original one, with a GH5, or a GH5s.

Yeah but it is totally possible it Could happen because BMD is giving all of it away free. Panasonic would be a fool Not to implement it if possible, and I am sure it is possible. Even the Apple Raw thingy is a big improvement if you just happen to be a Apple user. Now whether they, Panny, wants to make Apple richer than they already F ing are, that is to be seen. I somewhat agree, but you are Never going to make a GH5 look like a Canon, or a UMP 4.6k, or a Arri just by using Raw. If that was the case we would all be shooting with BMPCC that now cost 300 bucks and never look back, and Arri would go belly up..

Yeah but even if the Panasonic cameras get it there will still be a difference. BMD just has better Color Science. The PK4 is sort of a poor mans UMP 4.6. I think for pure film making it is a better tool. No real Cine camera is just a real Joy to use compared to say your Fuji X-T3. They take effort to get it right. A hell of a lot of effort. Hell if it was easy everyone would be making 5 Star movies. And nobody said making movies was cheap. Even your C200 rigged out well has to be over 10 grand, and that is a bargain compared to some!

Very true. But if I was talented enough to try to break into the indie market I would buy the PK4 over the Gh5. Now if I was rich I would have the PK4 and the GH5s to try to inter mix using an external recorder on it shooting ProRes. We are still back to no one camera is the best for every situation. And I doubt that will ever change.

There is no way in hell the GH5 or the GH5s is going to have a better overall output than the PK4 can produce. End of story. Now for convenience to get that better output, sure it is sucking ass compared to a GH5, GH5s.