webrunner5

That is kind of painful.

I don't think even B4 lenses with the doubler in them won't. It would be damn close if it does.

You show at shoots looking like a cheap ass, they think you don't Need or want any money. Physiology 101.

Well even 10 bit is not a lot to write home to mother about when it comes to damn good footage to shoot with let alone grade hard. But to the average person shooting even 8bit, or seeing it in 8 bit I doubt most know or care. Like has been said, hopefully you expose it right to start with and all is well.

https://camerasize.com/compare/#453,782

Comparison size wise.https://camerasize.com/ Plus BM Resolve 15 is now shipping. Beta over. http://indieshooter.com/blackmagic-design-announces-davinci-resolve-15-now-shipping/

And you wonder why they don't pay you shit for money! ?

LMAO. Sad but true. ?

Yeah 98% of everyone on here would be better off with a BMPCC truth be known, and 2 or 3 cheap ass Nikon MF lens. Well, and a pocket full of batteries.

I think Panasonic and Olympus both shot themselves in the foot with the pricing of the GH5, GH5s , and Oly with the EM1 mk II. That is crazy money for a m4/3 camera. Especially with the Sony A7 mk III now and the BM PK4 coming out. They have done screwed up as they say. The Genie is out of the bottle and no way to put it back in. And now Canon and Nikon both are going to have to have a FF mirrorless in the 2000 dollar range, and not some piece of crap one either. There really isn't a whole lot the A7 mk III can't do that even Nikon or Canon will have on their top end ones. What the hell is left out that the average person needs other than high MP for photos. And that is really over rated in this day and age anyways. Nobody prints anymore anyways. From Imaging - Resource "Sony A7 III Print Quality Excellent, high-quality prints up to at least 30 x 40 inches up to ISO 800; Very good prints up to 13 x 19 inches at ISO 6400; Usable 5 x 7 inch print at ISO 51,200." Hell that is a print as big as most peoples LCD TV!

I guess the D760 will be the 2000 dollar A7 mk III competition in Nikon's mirrorless body style. I doubt it will be a DSLR version?? I am not sure about the D500, could go either way. I think Only the D850, D5 will survive as DSLRs for a few more years? Same with Canon, 5D mk IV, 1Dx mkII only DSLR's left. I would surely think the 6D mkII and the 80D will be Mirrorless or just go away completely, especially the 6D mk II. I don't see a market for ANY APSC cameras down the road years from now. Why bother? With the crop mode on the A7's it is a waste of time to make a dedicated camera that Only does that. I thnk Fuji might have to change, but I think m4/3, 1" is safe for awhile. Not everyone wants or can afford FF stuff.

I am sure probably this new Nikon FF mirrorless will be pretty good, probably great, but it will Not be 2000 bucks, and have all the bells and whistles that Really all work on their first try. They will have all the good stuff in the top end one that cost 3200 dollars or more. But for the average DSLR shooter it will probably be all they have wanted or needed. It is the Video side of it that is still damn hard to make happen, even for Sony, at the lower price points. We want a C300 mk II for 2000 bucks, in a Sony A7 form factor! Maybe the BM PK4 might damn near be that without DPAF. But both Canon and Nikon could surprise us.. I would certainly wait for the 23rd LoL.

Yeah for the money just about impossible to beat for all it offers.

Probably a Leica R MF 50mm? https://www.ebay.com/itm/Leica-SUMMICRON-R-50mm-f-2-E55-MF-Lens-Optic-Clean/113004852743?epid=99733080&hash=item1a4f9d3607:g:oq8AAOSw48dbAok1

True but the difference between when I bought my iPhone 6s plus and this new iPhone X camera output wise is a pretty big increase in quality. It went from this is damn good to Christ it is good. Same with all the video toys on them. So yeah I know that is what like 3 years or better but it is a usable system now for an average person, and a hell I can at least get some decent footage if I forget my Big camera, or it runs out of battery. I am good for that.. ☹️ As a Phone, hell a 15 dollar flip phone is nearly as good LoL. But a few more years on these Smartphones and I think they might be a damn serious tool for video. With skill they sort of are now with the right apps, which there is a Ton of them.

Yeah and they have one of the best OOC 1080p going. 750 bucks is about as cheap as I see them on average. Which is damn cheap for what they can do.

Pretty good guide for You Tube. I see no real mention of 4K influencing anything. But they said at the end like 68% of YT videos are HD versus SD on the first page when you search. https://backlinko.com/youtube-ranking-factors

Well that kind of sucks LoL. They look sort of like normal Glasses. Hmm. I am not sure what has happened to Intel. They went like a house on fire for years, and now they just seem to have hit a wall. Is the whole computer industry that way, or have Intel just run out of ideas? I really don't keep up with gaming much anymore. It raises my Blood Pressure too much. Not good for Old People LoL. ?

Hmm, I think you are onto something there. ?

I am too old to see much of anything on a phone! Why you think I use a 30" 2K monitor and look at Big signs!! Only in Texas LoL.

Well to be honest Casey uses Canon stuff again and they Really don't have a Good 4K Vlogging option. How stupid is that when you think about it in this day and age. I guess he switched for the DPAF? ☹️

Yeah I follow Casey Neistat for lack of anything else to do LoL. And he is not doing 4K now, and to be honest it looks like shit. "WHY DONT YOU SHOOOT 4k YOU IDIOT!" applies to him also in my opinion. It Ain't like he can't afford the stuff to do it!

Yeah Samsung Do know how to make smartphone screens no doubt. That part I do miss. The big, heavy part of it, not so much! ?

I talked to the guy that shot this video. He said it was shot on the BMPCC. Man that is just crazy how good it looks to me, on a camera you can now buy for 450 bucks.

These from Intel are even more interesting!