webrunner5

You guys are bringing back some great memories for me. This stuff is about as good as you could shoot back in the day with a 100K camera then. It was Just unbelievable that kind of quality years ago. And surprisingly it still is with these entries. Amazing how it has progressed, but also amazing how in a way it hasn't needed to be all that much better to be much better. I think we Humans are addicted to movement no matter the quality. Moving Pictures like they called it years ago still applies. I am old, but not that old lol.

Oh I was never that big time. I did local commercials and spots for TV. Carry over from my ENG work. Had a lot of contacts in the "business". So I guess I was like you. Chief, cook, and bottle washer. It was Super big money even for used stuff. We are talking 100K cameras new then. Miller tripods, fluid heads cost 1000's used. Only thing worth having at the time. All that footage is Long gone. Like I said some of that stuff my daughter still has in California. 720i was the best she has yet I guess of it. It's a joke now, but with skill it can be pretty good. It was the cats ass at the time. Tube and CCD stuff, tape decks and all. I guess she still keeps it because it sent her through 8 years of Collage. Made a Lot of money with it. I used her as a actor in some of it. It was a ball buster to do to be honest. Like I have said on here 100 times, Video Is Hard. Photo is a walk in the park compared to it.

I spent that much and more 35 years ago every year doing video. Sounds to me you are pretty clueless about this craft. Hell that is hardly 2 great Tripod setups in this day and age. I guess you rent that shit also. I thought you were a director? Why would a Director rent anything. Isn't that what a Producer does? Maybe if you hire a DoP he, she brings their own shit at times.

That tells me all I need to know about you then. Grats. If you think 60K is some Hugh ass investment for video when you are tying to make a living doing it you are on drugs.

If you are serious about this stuff you Own Cine Glass. The average person on here is just a Hobbyist. People that make a living doing this stuff are the opposite of the average person on here. They probably have WAY more money tied up in 3 to 5 lenses than people ever thought about camera wise. So yeah the GH5 is just Chump Change compared to the rest of the stuff they own or need. If normal lenses were that good all these Other company's would be out of business. They don't have ANY matter. They are a Plastic Blob. I think they are close to the worse photos I have ever seen. And I have seen a lot trust me.

Yeah that is the stupid ass photos I was talking about. You are crazier than I thought if you think that stuff is even piss poor, let alone good.

Oh my God the time and thought it took to make that. Amazing.

Well you are luckier than I am on them. Yeah the Ninja will cure it's warts. Grats.

I probably should Not have watched that at my age lol. Pretty intense. Nice camera work.

I think I would take a G7 over a GH4. The person that had it might have had the same mindset. If you get something cheap as hell...well there is probably a reason.

How about everyone on here getting off their Fucking ass and go outside instead of on the Web all day, and maybe do some Charity work instead of listening to Pink Floyd! Might be a novel idea. Believe it or not I do. Anyone on here that can afford to do this shit owes something to Humanity. They are a LOT luckier than a lot of people. End of Rant.

You have a WAY better CS in the GH5, even better in the GH5s. You have 10bit internal. You don't Have to buy a Gimbal. ISIS is that good. The 6K Anamorphic is worth it alone. It is a dream come true camera for the average person for a 1000 bucks. Same with the PK4. They are a gift for the average person.

Best post on here in weeks lol. Well stated.

Yeah the internet has Really dumbed down society as a whole, particularly young women. Young men have Always been a Jack Ass lol.

Night and day difference.

You can buy an EVA1 cheaper now than a C200. Not sure I would go the Canon route unless you have other cameras of theirs.

Yeah that guy in the video NEEDS to be put down, literally.

Yeah a GH4 is a lot more money. But a good camera if you like the CS in it. They are not a heck of a lot cheaper than a used GH5 since Panny lowered the price on the GH5. But if don't have the money you don't have the money as they say lol.

Then if you are that good then you can get an incredible deal on a G85. End of story. I hope you Do buy a GH4 lol.

This is the cheapest G7 on eBay can buy right now that is not a stupid auction.. It sure as hell is not Half price of a G85. It is 100 Dollars less unless you need a Pal version and that one is only 415 Dollars for the G85. Yeah if you want the one with no battery, etc, what good is that, and it is still over 400 bucks. Maybe you are looking at the European version of eBay. I don't know. All I know sure the G7 is a good camera, but it sure as hell isn't a G85. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-G7-Mirrorless-Micro-Four-Thirds-Digital-Camera-Body-Black/372708078104?hash=item56c721f218%3Ag%3AX4UAAOSwMvxdJIdU&LH_BIN=1

Yes.

Well You can't see Anything recording external with a G7. The LCD screen goes black.

Wow Olympus like output on Steroids lol. I like it!

50mbit interframe codec Should be equivalent to about 150mbit all-i in my experience, so not too bad.

https://www.eoshd.com/2012/09/the-panasonic-gh3-is-here/ I Never liked mine. I thought the output just lacked, well it lacked a lot to me. Sold it in less than 4 months. I think I had my Panny AF100A at the time and never could get it to match. But for the money they cost now probably a pretty good deal to have.