Adam Kuźniar

I had little luck even with taping the contacts.

I know it hasn't been designed for that but I'm currently editing a little BTS and accidentally slapped GHAlex on some GoPro footage and.. it actually looks quite good. Of course there's some artifacting and stuff but it looks a lot better than standard protune. Big shot is GoPro, small shot is GH5 shooting CineD. Same adjustment layer on both clips.

I don't think I understood what your problem is.. the clip you posted looks perfectly fine for me.

Your data is correct but your conclusions are wrong Yes, it has been proven that there's no credible evidence to support that the current strain of SARS-COV-2 is - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22221751.2020.1733440 There were multiple labs all over the world studying and researching coronaviruses. They have been known for years. Sure, it's interesting that the outbreak happened in the same city but it's just that, interesting. No causation proven. It's just what a government like China does, nothing new, nothing extraordinary. Uhh.. yeah, to study and research the virus? That's good.. right ? There are multiple societal and economical reasons why nothing has been done at that time. You can pose the same question right now - why didn't EU/USA countries react sooner when first cases were known in China? Same reasons. You're clearly suggesting just that and once again, there's no proof that SARS-COV-2 has been engineered. I'm not going to comment on the rest of your post since I don't have the time but maybe, just maybe we should talk about stuff we know, like I don't know, cameras; instead of stuff we have no idea and spewing mis-information. Your post is just adding to that pile.

Different strokes for different folks. Both MF and AF are tools and it's up to you to decide what you need and want to use. Youtubers talk a lot about AF because in their situation it is essential/super useful. It's one of the reasons why I want to switch to a7 II as a GH5 user.

source RIP EOS R5 release? What about other camera manufactures?

The whole 5 pages of this topic is why pre-production models and firmware makes zero sense to me. How am I supposed to get anything from these videos if everything they show is subject to change? How am I supposed to know if the jerky warpy IBIS is just pre-prod firmware or will be there in the camera I can ACTUALLY buy? How can I make a decision about the autofocus performance when everyone says "oh it's just pre-prod firmware it will be improved"? All I can get from these videos is that the camera looks nice, but I could also take it from reading a spec sheet and looking at the images online. Everything else isn't representative of what I'll find in the store. I just want a GH5 with proper autofocus.

X-T4 videos dropped today

I for one can't wait for 300$ chinese anamorphic clones to start coming up.

I love how that Vazen 28mm looks on the GH5 - it almost feels like it was made for it. Shame it's not a bit cheaper

Great explanation @kye !

There needs to be an FAQ to the chart 😄 I got to "Are you ready for the hassle of shooting scope?" and I have no idea what "shooting scope" means 😄 I'm just half-joking, this is so well done man!

Fun test made by Ted Harder on the Panasonic GH5 and GH5s Group on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/groups/pansonicgh5/permalink/2299318990367796/ It seems that Natural with +4 HUE has the most accurate skin tones.. More tests and the full post linked above.

This is such a grey topic. On one hand it is art, on the other art isn't a justification to being a bit of a prick and invading peoples privacy. I don't mind him doing this but I understand why Fujifilm pulled the ad back.

I've posted the screenshots before but the video is out in case anyone would want to check it out. Guess which shot is the GH5 one 😄 4k/10bit/100mbps HLG, graded with FilmConvert rest of the cameras were the BM Production 4k, Sony A7 2 and Canon 600D (wild mix I know)

yeah lol but they'd rather throw around sexist jokes that aren't even funny

ITT Boomers complaining about current generation

There are at least tens of reasons why they placed the mic where it is. Don't criticize before you know all the circumstances.

To be honest with you I only use HLG because it's the highest DR profile besides V-Log which I don't have 😄 I think I'd use V-Log if I had it. HLG has some problems with a weird green cast that.. crap, now that I'm thinking about it I think I did have -1 on hue on that particular shoot because of that, but I went back to 0 because FilmConvert seems to correct it very well.

Thanks man! If you're asking about these ones - - then it was HLG with all options on 0 and a quick grade with FilmConvert.

I know you're asking Sage but personally I use HLG simply because it's free ? I think I'd prefer V-Log if I had it because I had some issues with a weird green color cast when editing HLG.

Don't get me wrong but it definitely looks like it was shot in 2014 It just shows that if you have a good story you can make it happen on anything.

If you just want the stream, rent a Teradek Vidiu or something like that and you're done. If you want to add overlays and stuff, get the elgato camlink and hook it up to your laptop. Use external battery or something for power.

All I really do on this project is mess around with the RAW settings, slap the FilmConvert on and call it a day and I don't really want to buy another version just for Resolve. Plus I'm so much faster editing multicam shoots in Premiere than I am in Resolve and if I can keep the entire project to one program I will

FYI the new BRAW plugin for Premiere 1.6.1 work a lot better, no more render issues and the panel doesnt seem to stop working as often as it did on 1.6