Elliot M

Thanks for the EOSHD Sony profiles, which I use on my A6500. I also have a Canon 600d / T3i, and am wondering whether that, or a Sony A6000 would make a better budget b-cam to my A6500. Any thoughts on which would be best, and how to match the colour profiles? Would the EOSHD C-Log be a good way to go? Cheers!

Thanks for the EOSHD Sony profiles - they're great on my A6500. Anyone thoughts on which would make a better budget b-cam: the A6000 or a Canon 600d / T3i (I already own the latter)? And which pic profiles on those for best matching with the A6500? Thanks!

Hey all, which would make a better b-cam to the A6500: the A6000 or a Canon 600d / T3i? And which pic profile for best matching? I already use EOSHD profiles on my A6500, and own a 600d / T3i. Thanks!

Thanks everyone!

Thanks for these awesome videos. Particularly liked NX1User (Robert's) 'Dreamworld. Not sure how to tag on here to ask: was the sound recorded in camera? And slightly off-topic (apologies if it's the wrong place to ask): has anyone here compared the NX1 with Sony's A6500 for documentary video work? For 1080p delivery, with interviews and observational b-roll, the NX1 on paper still seems best: light enough to fit on a gimbal, useable touchscreen autofocus, mic input, near-enough flat profile for grading, decent OSS lenses - so like the A6500, but with less rolling shutter, no overheating, longer battery life and headphone input. Or am I missing something? Thanks all!

Has anyone here compared the NX1 with Sony's A6500 for documentary video work? For 1080p delivery, with interviews and observational b-roll, the NX1 on paper still seems best: light enough to fit on a gimbal, useable touchscreen autofocus, mic input, near-enough flat profile for grading, decent OSS lenses - so like the A6500, but with less rolling shutter, no overheating, longer battery life and headphone input. Or am I missing something? For those of you A6500 users in sizzling areas at the moment (hello tropical London), how are you finding the A6500 holding up for video work? If you've moved to the A6500 from the NX1, how do you feel about it? Thanks all!

Hi all, Hoping someone can help with this edit workflow question: I currently shoot video on Canon DSLRs (in H264 MOV format), and edit on a late 2009 iMac (2.8ghz i7 processor, 16gb memory). The films I make are mainly for web rather than TV broadcast, and beyond basic colour grade / tidying up, have minimal effects added (no CGI). Until recently, I used Final Cut Pro 7, using FCP's Log & Transfer function to import and edit footage in Pro Res 422 format. Having just moved to Premiere Pro CC 2017, I'm trying to figure out the most efficient workflow with the best resulting image. Should I import and edit in native H264 MOV? Or ingest and edit as either Pro Res or DNxHD? If Pro Res or DNxHD, what's the best way to ingest (or import / transcode)? I've been reading mixed things via Google; mainly Adobe-related articles explaining a native workflow, vs various articles sponsored by transcoding software companies, saying that transcoding will have a better result. Any thoughts would be much appreciated. Thanks! Elliot