BTM_Pix

Best I can currently see on offer for you is Doom on the Hasselblad X2D 100C…. The guy who showed that running recently has been very busy and is coaxing video recording from it. This is amongst a raft of other research he has been doing on feature extensions and documenting in his GitHub. https://github.com/radium-wang/Hasselblad-X-System-CIM-Firmware-Research-Feature-Extensions The pace at which he is doing this is quite something but it’s obviously uncertain on a timeframe of getting all this ready for prime time. These experiments also work on the “For God’s sake don’t pick it up in a shop or you’ll have to buy it” object of beauty that is the 907X/CFV100C

Yeah I was thinking of something like the Micro Studio G2 which I’m not sure has been a massive hit and they could be sat on a lot of stock where a cine driven firmware could kick start a comeback for it. Similarly, a highly configurable custom firmware for its actual intended use of a mini broadcast camera where a broadcaster could make it perform their exact needs would make it more appealing for them. And for suckers like me who have one for both purposes it would be a boon to have switchable firmware to make it more usable in the cine use. With regard to their bread and butter of broadcast, BM do a ton of “digital glue” type of stuff for conversion etc so I could see potential for a black box with HDMI I/O, SDI I/O, Ethernet, USB-C and Bluetooth and allow custom firmware to be used for it’s processor to do the exact type of conversion that you need at different times without having separate discrete boxes. So for example sometimes I want to do some SDI to HDMI, sometimes the other way round, sometimes I want to play media from USB to NDI etc etc but never at the same time. The obvious question would be why would BM only want me to buy one box when I’d have to buy multiple discrete boxes off them to do these tasks ? Obviously they’d prefer that but if I have to buy multiple discrete boxes my budget would dictate that I would have to buy cheaper generic products or secondhand versions of the BM ones - neither of which will generate new revenue for BM. That is very much what is driving the FM-1 take up and, as with that, people would be likely to eventually buy a multiple of the BM black box. Having stripped down open source hardware might well become a necessity to sell any quantity of products at affordable prices in the near future as RAM and storage prices continue their upward trajectory. None of it will happen of course but fanciful speculation a vital foundation block of this forum when things are quiet 😂

Blackmagic would also be another contender to do this.

Some really interesting things going on in the electronic music world at the moment. A company called M-Vave released a product called the FM-1 which is a little £60 synth that ostensibly does FM synthesis like a baby Yamaha DX7 but adds other features and controls. Someone decided to see if they could use Claude or Codex to see if they could hack it and put their own firmware on it to change it into what they wanted it to do. And they were successful. So other people thought they’d do the same to turn it into what they wanted it to do. A lot of other people in fact. I lost count at fifty but there is more or less a new firmware from someone every day making the FM-1 into what they want it to be for their music making. And most of them are completely different from each other and take into account different genres of music making and more preferred workflows etc The FM-1 is now just a development platform of components and everyone uses the screen, keypad, switches and encoders completely differently. And how did M-Vave respond to this ? Throw their toys out of the pram and threaten to brick everyone’s device and issue legal threats ? Nope, they went “Fucking hell this is cool” and released the source code so everyone can actually build off it more effectively and make even more cool firmwares for different genres of music and unique workflows. This largesse is obviously underpinned by their understanding that this will sell WAY, WAY more FM-1s than if they went the other way. Previously, anyone who didn’t want the very specific type of synthesis and workflow the FM-1 offered would have gone “That’s cute and great value for money but it’s not something for me”. Now it’s appealing to EVERYONE because there are firmwares to suit everyone and if there isn’t then it’s within their grasp to roll their own. So not only buying it, they are buying them in multiples to have different firmwares on them. This has been going on for about six weeks and whilst it’s been interesting in and of itself it’s what it’s caused in the past week that is very eye opening. This is an Akai MPC one, a very sophisticated music production device that retails for about £700. Behringer have now announced this, the Kick Now, under normal circumstances this would raise a few moans but no surprise as Behringer have built their business on releasing products that are heavily “influenced” by other peoples. However, what is different here is that they’ve seen what’s happened with the FM-1 and the Kick is not only open source but is also only going to be $150 Even by their standards that price is wild. And they haven’t stopped there. On consecutive days they’ve released two other products (a drum machine and a sequencer) that are also open source and the same price point if not lower. Akai have come back with their own new product that will also be open source. The genie is out the bottle here and going forward these companies are now just effectively selling development platforms with minimal functional “examples of operation” firmware. And cutting out the cost to them and the end user of full blown software development. Want a feature ? Make it yourself from the building blocks we give you and leave us alone. From a manufacturer point of view, not having to deal with the demands of a certain section of whiney entitled arseholes who want everything bespoke to them even when it didn’t include it in the spec when they bought it would be reason enough to go this route 😂 Anyway, I’m wondering if a camera manufacturer might be brave enough to go down this route ? Cameras as development platforms would be pretty amazing wouldn’t it? Traditional guardians of the cripple hammers would be aghast but there’s nothing to stop an upstart manufacturer from doing it. Someone like Sigma or Sigma or even Sigma would be very appropriate. If they look at what’s happening with the nascent FP hacking and embrace it rather than ignoring it then things could get very interesting. I don’t even think it needs to be either or as they could do this in parallel. FP2 for £1800 or whatever it is and the FP2Dev for say £1400 would be an interesting proposition. They could hardware protect it to fully lock down the FP2. Well, for a while at least 😂

I think playing Densha de Go! on a Switch whilst on a train on the actual Yamanote line would be an embarrassing confession for a man of my advancing years. So I absolutely did not do that last year and will definitely not be doing it again next month. Absolutely not. Nor will I be getting the hardware controller for it either.

I’m curious about with it sharing the same sensor flavour if not THE same exact one as the a7cr what could potentially be coaxed out of it. Sigma have lost me a bit with the FP2 but I’ve always had a hankering for the FP-L as a mini Leica Q3 with it bonus video features over the FP in terms of PDAF and a small crop mode which @Andrew - EOSHDraves about for a very clean image. The used prices are now heading to £1000 so it wouldn’t take much to persuade me that that was the upgrade path for me * I’d get to keep my EVF as well. * Obviously as a crazed addict I’d keep the original too.

And then smash those like, subscribe and notification buttons.

I’m hopeful someone will investigate the FP-L in the near future. Unless of course Sigma have put entirely different internals in it as well as the larger sensor. The internals of a Nintendo DS or some other such kinkiness.

Considering Panasonic name all their full frame cameras after S-Bahn lines then maybe Densha de Go would be the most appropriate game to play on them.

Are these investigations applicable to the FP-L as well ?

You can always rely on Sigma to do baffling stuff with their cameras. It’s actually borderline kinky. Swapping the HDMI port to full size and thereby blocking the upgrade path for those of us with the existing EVF is another one by the way. The least said about including internal storage that isn’t fast enough for the higher data rates the better.

You are simultaneously the best and worst person to be let loose with these tools 😂 Seriously though, a database of cameras with their associated shortcomings would be useful to target some fixes. I’ll keep banging the drum about you patching the S5ii to get the S5iix features ! At the very least let me run Galaxians on it.

I envy the Ronin 4D for that.

For anyone looking to do something similar a suitable harvesting product is this Allied Vision industrial camera that uses the same Kodak CCD. They are also long since defunct of course but are available on eBay. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/284133056331 I think the price seemingly on the high side is probably reflective of people looking to do a DIY Digital Bolex too but when you consider that a used D16 is not easy to come by and is well north of £5K then for someone determined enough this route is something of a relative bargain. Pi 5 and its eco-system have now matured sufficiently to be able to handle the Allied Vision software in the intervening years so it’s definitely viable as a DIY project. Not trivial of course but viable.

Another new size appropriate lens for the S9 in the form of a 20mm f2.5 launched today. https://www.wexphotovideo.com/panasonic-lumix-s-20mm-f2-5-lens-3358704

Nikon have announced an interesting firmware update for 2027. Could be a confidence that’s announcing this three days before IBC or maybe someone else is announcing a competing camera there that Nikon need to get ahead of. Either way, it looks like a great update for existing users. Full details here https://www.nikon.com/company/news/2026/0908_01/

6K Pro gap is even wider of course but yes it has always been a compelling package. Meike never did do an L mount version of their EF adapter with the variable ND drop in filters which would have bridged one gap. Of course there is a strong argument for having a non-native EF mount with a proper AF system sat behind it over a native mount with a rudimentary AF-S system sat behind it. Its the internal ProRes that would definitely be a deal breaker of course if you need to hand off footage.

They’ve managed to put themselves in a position where their full frame 6K is significantly cheaper than their Super 35 6K version so the latter will hit that sub $1000 point when they clear it out as it makes zero sense at this point.

Yes, you should title them with as many poophemisms as you can find that sound like footage they’d like to steal. Building a log cabin Clearing the pipes Cutting a cigar Decorating the White House Downloading some software Feeding the fish Laying some cable Stocking the lake with brown trout Etc etc

More reductions and from the wording of the press release they could be permanent as they’ve found cost savings in production. £1463 for the Cinema 6K and £1830 for the PYXIS 6K are excellent prices really, particularly in light of the AF updates for both cameras. Both those prices INCLUDE VAT by the way. Hopefully they find some of these cost savings in production for the PYXIS 12K, despite it already being very decent value for money.

They will be very important as the cameras will be the capture device for the worldwide free training data they’ll be getting from the cloud storage/editing function that will be offered to the users who’ll be unwittingly doing the training for the company. And paying for the capture device as well. And they ban DJI for being untrustworthy eh? Makes you wonder which family member is backing this financially ?

Yeah, “Unconsciously Stumbling Upon The Appropriate Lens Choice Since 1978” is definitely something I’d like to have as an epitaph.

It depends on the range really. A 24-70mm is definitely 3-4 primes for me but something like the Canon 35-350mm is a different animal. Leica used to do these two lenses They are referred to as MATE (Medium Angle Tri-Elmar) and WATE (Wide Angle Tri-Elmar) and are “zoom” lenses with fixed focal length stops. The MATE is stepped at 28-35-50mm and the WATE at 16-18-21mm which on their intended use (Rangefinders) were used with a specific ad on viewfinder that was so clunky it is known as the Frankenfinder. They are not fast but are compact and have focal length stops that make sense so are very much a bag of primes (and very much more useful adapted on to an EVF body). Some Panasonic fixed lens cameras (LX10 and LX100 spring to mind) emulate this by allowing you to use the zoom ring to increment to fixed focal lengths and it is a good feature especially on those with return to position on power on functionality. I *think* some of the Sony RX100 do this as well.

It lets them hit attractive spec points like 3x optical zoom and 12x zoom when using the digital shenanigans. Although the 3x optical zoom is actually 3x switch as the intermediate points are digital and if you are in D-Log2 then it’s a hard switch as there is no digital zoom. I think 45mm equivalent would’ve been better from a practical point of view but 2.25x optical zoom and 9x total zoom doesn’t look as good in the marketing. Even though 20-190mm equivalent is still not too shabby ! A good practical look at the challenges around shooting with it in this video.

This is the wide angle adapter. Wouldn’t take much of a leap for them to have a wide angle adapter in the unpopulated area where the tele lens sits behind. Or make one with removable magnetic tc/wa adapter set to choose which one you want (or not) in front of which lens. I expect Ulanzi will have such a set out within the month 😂