kye

I went down a several-hundred-dollar dead end before switching to Rode. I'm sure there are alternatives that are better, but considering the Rode VMP range has been battle-tested by the vloggers the world over, and the VMP+ update basically addressed every issue that vloggers had, Rode seems like the safe choice. Plus with 19 hour battery life, if you can charge it daily then you can turn it on when you wake up and still have it available all day without having to carry extra batteries. It even turns on and off automatically, so apart from charging it I basically don't even think about it. I couldn't have bought any other mic and had that certainty.

Lots of kids also want to be astronauts or firemen but sales of space-suits and fire-axes isn't through the roof, I suspect due to the same problem. Both my kids have made a dozen or so YT videos each, plus who-knows how many other videos on Musically/TikTok etc, and with my entire camera collection the only thing they've ever wanted to borrow was my tripod - they just use their phones. I gave my daughter my Rode VideoMic Me as her phone still has a headphone port and mine doesn't but I'm not sure if she ended up using it much. My daughter asked about using one of my cameras once, and I didn't even get through explaining that it records to an SD card, then you get an SD card reader and plug it into your computer, and then... <screws up face> "nah, I'll just use my phone". She uses airdrop. But what about video quality you ask? They care about content, editing, and making them funny. They don't even have the YT flippy screen problem because they use the selfie camera not the much better quality rear one. The screen of a phone kills almost any camera screen and it's built in. Kids are like professional film-makers - they want to get from idea to pay-off in as quick a time as possible. You'd be forgiven for thinking that vloggers want flippy screens for their DSLR / MILC cameras but I'd say the vast vast majority of them are using 'lesser' cameras. YouTubers are like online marketing people - the internet makes it look like the world is full of them, but in reality the world is run by other people doing useful things instead of just endlessly talking about themselves online. Of course, we probably watch the camera vloggers who talk about cameras much more than the fashion/food/lifestyle vloggers who talk about everything else, and the camera guys are telling you that you need a 1DXII and cinematic b-roll partly to get you to get you to click the affiliate links in the description. Besides, quality from a phone can be just great... My advice to my daughter goes something like "your phone is fine, but use a shitload of light" and to use the microphone I gave her because it will make the sound less like she's recording in a bathroom. She's 15 BTW, so no dummy. If these things mattered to her then she'd be all over it by this age, but they just don't.

...and gets the images you want to get. This is art, not science.

They say that restriction breeds creativity... Sony says "you're welcome!"

Nice work!!

If you didn't like the experience then you're right to change. Film-making is a creative pursuit and it's hard to remain creative if every time you think about your camera it gives you a little bump of negative emotion. There are so many cameras around these days that are "good enough" that you should be able to find one that gives you a little positive bump throughout the process, or at least doesn't detract or get in the way.

Be aware of focus ring direction on lenses. IIRC Minolta and Nikon are opposites, so if you have any muscle memory then it won't like changing from one to the other! A 4K monitor is useful for having a 1:1 window of 1080p plug the tools of your NLE visible at the same time. Just like how they were advertising 5K monitors as having 4K preview with a GUI also visible. So if you want to justify your 4K monitor purchase then get shooting and then get editing!!

What are you shooting? 70-200 sounds pretty long as your only lens. Unless you're buying some other ones to go with it? The Northmen videos are really nice. I kind of wish they were pumping them out like lots of other creators. I think YT has spoiled me!

You're right. I just found the C200 review I got that from and discovered I read it wrong. My bad ??? That makes it even more of a general purpose lens I guess, but my point was that my default is 35mm so it's all relative to how you shoot and what you like to see

When you crop is it to try and create an additional camera angle? My wife does public speaking and they film the talks but only from one angle, so if you want to edit them without jump cuts then you have to crop to create a virtual second angle. It's an odd thing but it kind of works. I'm curious how you use it.

In terms of focal lengths, having the 20mm lens on the C200 (with it's 1.74x crop factor when shooting 4K) would be the same field-of-view as a 35mm lens, which is a nice length. I shoot home videos and travel films and the occasional project for a friend and these mainly consist of landscapes, environmental portraits, and close-ups when people are close by (like at a table). I'd been shooting with the normal 24-80 / 80-400 range of my zooms and my phone and came to the realisation that 24mm isn't wide enough, and also not long enough, so when I changed camera systems to the GH5 and had to start a lens collection from scratch I decided to avoid 24mm altogether. I now have these 35mm equivalents: 16mm f5.6 (great for landscapes, architecture, and that Wow factor of a wide lens) 35mm f1.4 (this is my main lens, it works for people, environmental detail shots, or general environment shots) 116mm f4 (this was my only longer lens and I found it to be a bit too long, so I'm looking for a replacement around 80mm) I'm also looking for a good sports lens in the 270-400mm equivalent range. Although I can use the ETC mode to get a 1.4x digital crop which makes the 16mm a 24mm equivalent I never found myself doing that, I'd change to the 16mm only if there was something really Wow and then just change back to the 35mm 1.4 without thinking about it as that's my default lens. The same crop mode turns the 35mm into a 50mm and I did use this quite a bit. When I have the GH5 being stored at home I always have it charged, with memory card in it and ready to go so that when something interesting happens I can run and grab it and capture the moment. For this reason I always store it with the 35mm lens on it because that's such a good all-around lens for me. It's good to really pay attention to what you're shooting and understand what focal lengths work for you. Also pay attention to the aperture - having fast lenses is great but if you never open them up that much, or those shots never make the final edit, then you might be better off with a slower but more flexible zoom. Everyone is going to have their own preferences that suit their style. Just as I skip 24mm the next person might only ever use that length and might love it.

Let's hope they still do!

I think they're separate too. Canon proves that you can have FF MILC without great video and still be successful. In a way many other companies are limiting video quality on their FF cameras and keeping video quality for their cine-lines. If you think of Panasonic as having two cine lines - the cine EVA and the GH series, then it kind of makes sense. In my mind the GH5 and P4K are completely different cameras because the GH5 has IBIS and is rock solid and the P4K doesn't have IBIS and isn't rock solid. The GH5S doesn't have IBIS but is rock solid. Of course, the P4K also has RAW/Prores, but that's not a deal-breaker for me as the 10-bit GH5 files are good enough (hell, they're great, what am I saying!). Anyway, the GH6 will be rock solid and if it had IBIS and RAW then that would be spectacular, and we haven't mentioned 8K yet.... They could even make it a hybrid where it would do up to 4K RAW and 8K in H265, that would sure be something! I think AF is a funny topic that people don't really talk about sensibly / consistently / somethingly. I've been an AF person for a long time because I wanted the camera to do it for me, and have only recently changed to MF. Dear mother do you get kick-back on these forums when you say you need AF for your shooting style... all the "they don't use it in Hollywood" " you're not a real film-maker unless you use MF" "growing up I only ate gravel" type comments all get trotted out. I think our views of AF still haven't stabilised - the same people would criticise AF reliance and then turn around and criticise the GH5 for not having good AF. If you want a good argument for not needing AF then here it is... the GH5. Hopeless as shit for AF, sells bucketloads, reputation as industry standard workhorse. By the time we get around to accepting AF (and having some consistency in our opinions) I think AI and processing power may well have solved it. Panasonic might turn out to have made the smart move by getting their AI sorted out and when it finally starts delivering the others may be years behind. Sure, Canon might focus on the face, but film-making isn't always about faces. I also think that would be great. Not only would it mean inexpensive media, huge speeds, and less internal heating, but it would be cheap and small to implement in the camera body. Anyone who has seen the size of the SD and CFast slot in the XC10 knows that those things take up quite a bit of space in a small camera body.

If you're delivering in 4K: shoot 4K and use proxies to edit with. If you're delivering in 1080 and need to crop a lot in post: shoot 4K. If you're delivering in 1080 and don't need to crop much in post: film a few test shots to compare the 4K 10-bit mode and the 1080 10-bit mode and see how the image looks to you and if it's acceptable. The 10-bit modes are one of the key advantages of the GH5 and I'd suggest that for commercial work 10-bit vs 8-bit probably makes more difference than 4K vs 1080p.

@Ehetyz @mercer My Takumar 55 1.8 arrived yesterday and I compared it to my Helios and found some interesting results. Wide open the Helios was tack sharp (ha ha) in the very centre but got crazy soft on the edges (even with the 2x crop of MFT) and the Tak was considerably softer but had the same level of sharpness / bloom / flare across the whole frame. By F4 they were getting similar, but the character of the softness was quite different. I'll do some more tests and post a little write-up in the lenses thread when I'm done. I've still got some lenses on the way.

I've recently ordered a bunch of lenses, mostly from Japan, and the main seller I bought from sends these: I don't know what chazuke is yet, but each packet has a different picture on it (this one is the fish) so it will be fun to find out. The instructions are photocopied, but they're obviously drawn by hand, which isn't something you'd get from many other countries! How about just buy the 18-35 second hand and then when/if you go full-frame just sell it again. This is a classic lens and it should hold its value relatively well, or at least won't cost much if you think of the loss as a kind of rental fee I've done this too. I wasn't sure about my 700D and for a while was wondering about Magic Lantern and so I just bought one to try, and now that I'm not really going to use it I'll probably sell it again.

True, but considering this filter adds a massive blur, I wouldn't think it would make much difference. Maybe for other filters it might matter.

Sounds like a faulty touchscreen sensing ghost touches. ...or you're haunted!! (when is Halloween again? ???)

I agree, everything has pros and cons. Just think about how every new camera release we all turn ourselves inside out because there's no perfect camera I think it also depends on what situations you shoot. Some people have control and the time to tweak things as they shoot, and there are real advantages to getting it right in-camera. Others are recording with varying levels of control or even influence on their situation, and just getting the shot might be the best they can hope for. For these people, moving light-sources or tweaking settings just isn't feasible, so adjusting things in post when the pressure is off gives them extra creative expression. My personal situation is that in shooting my family and travel videos I don't have time to fiddle around with various things. This is partly because we go where it's interesting and not where the light is good, partly because for me the holiday comes before the photography, and partly because I'm just not skilled enough to operate the camera and think about every variable all at once, which is why I rely on automatic settings for some things. I started this thread because I really like the look of the BPM filters and was using the Glow OFX plugin with Resolve (that does an ok job at this effect) and wanted to see how well I could replicate the real filters. I shared it partly because others might learn something useful, because it's nice to give back to the community, and because writing it up forces me to think clearly and critically about it so I learn more effectively by doing it. Education is one of those things where everyone wins Edit: I also really love that look during golden hour when the sun is out of frame but catches the BPM and gives a warm light-leak style rendering to part of the frame. That's also something you could model through tracking and placing the lens flare effect off screen, but light-leaks and flares is something I haven't added to my videos yet, so maybe that's something I'll explore in the future. I want to really push my videos but not to the point where the medium gets in the way of the content, if that makes sense

Yeah, it's great if you can keep compatibility between bodies but cover the range of nice features (slow-motion, recording limits, as you say) between them so you've got the right tools for the job. It's also nice if you can work out what combinations seem to work nicely together too. For example if you decided that for gimbal shots you always wanted a 50mm FOV and slow-motion then there's a chance that you could just leave that lens on the XT2. Perhaps you'd have your unmanned G7 with a wide lens, and perhaps the other one might be a longer length for tighter shots. Obviously these are just examples, but the less you have to be swapping lenses, putting cameras on and off gimbals, swapping filters and all that fiddling the better.

Reasons that adding the effect in post is better: It's free It works on all your cameras and lenses without adapters It works on all your past footage It works on all stock footage You can control the strength of it shot to shot You can control it within frame (you can have the nice skin smoothing effects on skin and not have it go nuts from a direct light-source also in frame) You can change the colour rendering like the Warm Pro Mist filters, or any other tint you care to make (even ones Tiffen doesn't offer) You can change the characteristics to emulate their other filters (Black Pro Mist is only one of the filters they offer - https://tiffen.com/diffusion/ ) You can even have hybrid effects like light sources glow green with a red outer ring around them, all adjustable to taste Real filters can have reflections under certain circumstances Reasons that adding the effect in post isn't better: It doesn't work properly if any channel is clipped It doesn't work with any light-source that isn't in the frame It isn't an exact match to the look Things that aren't good reasons for doing anything: That's how they do it in Hollywood

Looks good! How are you finding the camera?

wow.......

What bodies do you think you'll get?

Apparently there is going to be a new border that might need some coverage....