Jump to content

DanielVranic

Members
  • Posts

    229
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DanielVranic

  1. Great. And I rarely if ever use face/eye detect, usually use like Spot detect. Work well?
  2. So I am in need of some faster AF glass for video. Fuji doesn't have it. (yet. I see you 33f1) But I was thinking maybe Sigma ART line - 30mm 1.4 with the Fringer Ef-FX Pro How would that perform?
  3. ah shit, well I should probably have read those! So far I love it, i built the FLog-VLog LUT in LUTCalc and for about 80% of shots it works perfectly. But in shots where there is a huge gap from high to low its blows out the highs and crushes the lows. Whereas if I did a manual grade with curves it would be still OK. I totally understand it was never made for the XT3, but just trying to find a way to avoid that for now.
  4. Hey Sage, I have a question. To make the best use of the LUT, do you prefer footage be overexposed and brought down?
  5. I actually did the F-Log -> F-log/F-Gamut to V-log/V-Gamut LUT from LUTCalc -> GHa Daylight on my XT3 footage and it is beautiful!!!
  6. Thats what I do right now. I think i explained it in a different thread - but i usually convert from FLog to 709 using curves and a CST, and then go from 709 to LogC and back to 709. That gives me my highlight roll-off and looks pretty. But if this LUT can do both? and give me nice new colors? sign me up.
  7. HMMMM. looks very good. Wondering if I should just do that.
  8. ProResRAW would be so dope for the Fuji-XT3
  9. Oh! Its a Star Wars quote! I was just joking~
  10. if what you have told me is true, you have gained my trust.
  11. Curious how well that adapter would work with the 18-35 1.8
  12. Question. My Fuji 35mm has an outer diameter under 40mm and is 35mm crop f2. Would the Anamorphot40 Compact work on that? And would the AF still work?
  13. Actually editing a project right now with filmconvert! I love it!! After the FilmConvert i always still do an LogC conversion, and I like what it does to the roll-off
  14. I thought that was changed with a firmware update?
  15. Those look cool! Would be cool if there was a Sony E mount to FX speedbooster so I could get the FF view
  16. 400MBps UHD on both Heat was not a factor. The camera (XT3) directly next to it ran for 15 mins longer (filled the card, non-heat) Have not swapped them in a while, so i do not recall if there has been a change. I will test this afternoon.
  17. I have actually been having some issues with one of my XT3's. So I do alot of local band filming in town, and last night had a gig for an album releae party. One cam on my Ronin other camera on my Rhino off to the side. Ronin cam had UHSII 300mb/s cards in them, Rhino cam had UHS1 95mbs cards in there. The Ronin had 40mins of rec time, and the Rhino had 30. Band plays for 29 minutes. Ronin cam did great, love it, and I walk over to the Rhino and see it say it has 8mins of recording time avaliable. Sure enough I get home and it just stopped recording entirely about 22 minutes in. No battery issue, obviously the cards were not filled.. and this is the 3rd time this has happened on a gig. Any ideas?
  18. While I do not own a GH5, but an XT3 with HLG, I do not use HLG in low-light, or ever. FLog usually has enough data for low-light, but I would recommend you use a non-log profile. Cine-D would be my pick. When I shoot in lower light I always switch over to one of the Provia modes.
  19. I have actually used Flog in low-light with success and failed at HLG - HLG got UGLY in low light. FLog did not. Plus having the 10BIt already means you dont have to overexpose your log footage... I have done test after test and FLog is still superior
  20. Hello everyone! Been looking around quite a bit to see what is the best/most affordable (trying to balance that) adapter to go anamorphic on this lens. My 44-4 is Speedboosted so my XT3 has the full frame view. In alot of my research I keep finding people who are faking it with filters and mods to the lens, but nothing "true" anamorphic. What would be the best add-on package for this?
  21. For me, I used both side by side and ended up with the 16-55mm. The 18 was good and the AF was quick. I found it quicker and more natural-looking? if that makes sense. Almost like a skilled person with a follow focus. I also use the Ronin-S, there is no direct compatibility between them, but the Ronin is OK. Looking back, I probably would have bought something else.
×
×
  • Create New...