thebrothersthre3

The 120p looks awesome. Is it 10bit? I don't really mind the crop, its not that big of a deal. I can always use a speedbooster to make it up.

Hmm global shutter will probably mean subpar dynamic range and low light. No rolling shutter would be great for weddings though, no half screen flashes from the rolling shutter.

The lens turbo is awesome! I definitely wouldn't buy fuji glass for manual focus. Auto focus lenses are almost always crap for manual. I use Minolta vintage glass for manual focus 50mm 1.4 , 35 1.8, 24 2.8, and 128 2.8. I am getting the Fuji for auto focus and stills. Even if it wasn't a still camera I'd still buy it for auto focus. I really prefer APSC, but if it weren't for auto focus I'd probably go with BM.

You can punch in to focus while recording!!!! WOOOW!

oh its done in post not in camera? Interesting. It certainly does look very nice. Almost tempted to buy one, but that tiny sensor wide lens look is kind of off putting for the majority of things.

Yeah definitely if you need stills. But yeah auto focus and S35 sensor. The three reasons I am getting it over the black magic. Finally a confirmation that the high ISO performance beats the XT2. Definitely more detail, less mush.

For me to get it I'd want to see 4k 60p 10bit or at least 422 8bit and 4k 120fps. Would make a killer slow motion camera being as good as it will be in low light. Otherwise I'll stick to the XT3.

I think it should give you more room in grading though to decide where those stops are going.

That if its all just software stabilization it probably takes up a lot of processing power. When you have a small sensor it gives you more room for processing power. Still impressive that they fit it in such a small body. That said if they really wanted to be innovative they should be giving us 4k 120fps. Such a small sensor should be capable.

Smaller sensors are always easier to stabilize. I wouldn't mind a larger camera to stabilize an M43 sensor though its a lot larger then a Go pro one. I've pretty much abandoned IBIS for now though. Sticking to my gimbal which I find works great for my uses. I get why a vlogger or traveler would want something like a Hero7 though.

Try it and tell me what you think compared to vlog.

Anyone know if this camera will support focus control on the Ronin S?

To really test dynamic range thoroughly wouldn't you also need to see how much info you can pull from the shadows? You might want to add HLG to the test. There is a claim out there that you'll get 1-2 more stops of dynamic range then in vlog. This is the method I've heard gets one more dynamic range in HLG. "So in FCPX for instance you just make all your libraries 2020 and bring in all your footage and pull your HLG highlights down to 50IRE and export to 709. You don’t need an HDR monitor or anything else. Your 709 output will have the 14.6 stops of DR if you remap it this way. " from

Really considering this for my IBIS camera. How much better is the IBIS compared to a GX85 G85, gh5?

Thats pretty cool. Real life isn't always very appeasing haha. I am cool with Sony having accurate colors. They should just include a picture profile that has a very pleasing forgiving look.

Link doesn't work bro

Pretty pointless trying to judge noise levels off vimeo or youtube. The Moonlight short looks great, though I don't think anything with such high megapixels will be able to compete much with the A7S.

Yeah man Paul Leeming just got back to me and said that the GH5 is ahead in every profile including CineD. That's me taking his word for it so that may not be worth much to you. He did extensive testing with the GH4 back in the day though so I trust him.

Yeah I know, I really don't think CineD has more dynamic range on the GH4, could be wrong. Especially not as dramatic as in that video(which is why I think its extended ISO, because dynamic range is pretty dramatically worse with it).

The EOS-M is pretty cool but the ISO performance is pretty terrible. I own a GX85, its a pretty darn good camera for the price, especially used. Not as good as the GH5 in low light or dynamic range, but its nice. IBIS is awesome too.

Its the Fuji XT3 for me. It gives me decent low light (usable 6400), APSC sensor, fast auto focus, good color without grading, 10 bit, and 4k 60p. Its only missing IBIS, but I have my gimbal which is more useful anyways. People always say to focus on craft not camera, and I do. The Fuji simply is the first camera that really fills my needs. GH5 had 10 bit, Fuji and Canon had great color, Sony had amazing auto focus. Fuji just gives me all my needs in one. I am sure new cameras coming out will be tempting, but I just don't really need anything else.

I am not 100% sure. I think its just me guessing. I remember when the video came out though (around when the GH5 was first released). I remember seeing another video where a guy was puzzled at the lack of Dynamic range and sure enough he was using 100 iso (which is extended iso that decreases dynamic range). I know Paul Leeming found the GH5 to have the same dynamic range in cineD.

Brother the dude in that test was using extended ISO. This decreases dynamic range. They are the same in CineD otherwise. Vlog and HLG you get at least a stop more. The XH1 has pretty solid dynamic range in Flog and Eterna.

Could be an 8k sensor with a 6.5k readout or something. Very interesting news.