thebrothersthre3

Only thing noticeable to me was the dynamic range difference.

I think it would be selling better if they had included internal 4k 60p or 10 bit internal. At its price point it would really put itself ahead of Canon, Sony, and Panasonic.

The lowlight performance would be vastly better than the pocket, but I get it. Its a lot of money. You could potentially get around the crop with a speedbooster though, which would also bring you into medium format territory when not shooting in cropped mode.

can't complain for $150 bucks with lens tho

Lots of people dislike Sony color, though HLG is kind of a work around you can use. An issue with Sony is it uses heavy noise reduction past 1600 iso that causes ghosting and soft mushy skin tones. Gh5 is very usable up to 3200 iso. However its going to have noise at 1600 iso and up. Its pretty pleasant noise at least up to 3200 iso, but its there. If you are one of those people that obsess over noise I'd definitely recommend the Nikon Z6, A7S2, or Pana S1. Just have to decide what system to invest in. The A73 is also great if you want the latest auto focus, just keep in mind the noise reduction issues it has(may not even be noticeable to you). I find the XT3 is a great inbetween full frame and M43. Its hard to beat its internal 10 bit recording at up to 400mbps as well as 4k 60p.

The Z6 is a great leap forward for sure. People don't appreciate things once they come along there is always something else on the horizon.

Do you notice a difference when not cropped?

The prores does look like mush compared to RAW, though its barely noticeable when not zoomed in 400%, to me at least. That RAW is so sharp lol

I only saw both movies in theaters, but didn't notice anything unusual. I did notice that in Captain Marvel a lot of scenes were really dimly lit to the point where it was annoying. Action scenes mainly.

I've found out outside of theaters its better to have more contrasty shots in the dark. Otherwise compression and bad quality screens kind of ruins it.

My sister complained about it. I don't watch the show so I don't know though. I do hate stuff that is difficult to see. Works for some situations but for action I like to see everything well.

is it much worse than the micro?

They confirmed they are working on ND's but not for the Z cam E2

I wonder if the original ursa mini 4k is more similar to the OG Pocket and Micro

Interesting, how do you compare the Ursa 4.6k image to the micro and OG pocket?

I like E-stabilization, it adds a lot. It can add weird jitters if you are doing a lot of movement though. I agree the GH5 at 3200 is probably better than the GH4 at 1600 iso.

Yeah the FS5 is really nice and small. I feel like with Z-cam rising that type of form factor is the future.

Why not! If you need RAW its got it internal unlike the C300.

Some vintage glass is really nice wide open but most when stopped down a notch perform really well. For me the law of diminishing returns comes into play when comparing with higher end glass. Depends on the specific lens in question of course.

Yeah the OG pocket is nice. I love the grip on it. But I have mine all rigged up so that its small size is no longer and advantage.

Panasonic marketed the GH5S as a video camera.

I thought the EVA1 had 10 bit 4k 60p, that sucks. The FS7 is quite the package.

Thats a great deal! The full HDMI on the micro is really nice. I hate BM for putting micro HDMI on anything.

I plan on getting one next year. I think my BMPCC could compliment it well. The Fuji's are still nice for certain types of shooting like weddings, home video, or just for super quick shooting. I'll be keeping them for sure. Can't have too many cameras? I was looking at the FS5 as well, crazy output for the money. 12bit prores RAW up to 120fps 4k and good low light performance. That said I've always said I think BM is better when it comes to color and the way it handles highlights. Thats a bigger selling point for me.

Definitely considering a Micro. For me right now though the Ursa Mini 4.6k seems like a great deal. Just saw one for $2500 on ebay. Quite expensive compared to a BMPCC but crazy cheap for what kind of cameras it can compete with.