thebrothersthre3

On the flip side some couples want to see the big cameras, as they associate that with high end. I think it will be a while before that changes. Even now most people have no idea what or why cinema cameras are expensive and used professionally or how they compare to a cell phone camera.

Looks very nice to me.

Art is a fine balance of technical skills and pure imagination. I would have taken this film as the work of a seasoned artist. In other words, very nice work! I had thought the grain was intentional. Just shared on my facebook.

Scary stuff guys. I think if they stuck with a 4k sensor rather than pushing the whole 6k 8k thing, they could pull off 10 bit. Heck I'd be happy with a 4k sensor with 1080p only output like the OG A7S. I really don't care much about resolution.

I saw some guy make use of the high ISO's on the A7SII for a wedding. Forget how high it was but he was shooting a beach wedding that was solely lit by torches. He got exposure right but the torches were blown out and you couldn't even tell they were torches. I do like the A7SII though, I wish they'd make a newer version that is basically 100% the same just with 10 bit capabilities and higher frame rates. Being able to shoot high ISO's clean is really useful for high speed shooting, especially 120fps.

Of the jobs on set I hate being the boom OP the most. Its difficult and tiring tbh.

I am pretty confident saying 25,000 iso is more than enough for any situation I shoot in. Realistically 3200 iso is as I pretty much light everything. Highlights blowing out is the issue I run into most often. That's why I value dynamic range a lot more than anything else.

I don't think an 8k monitor would be necessary. I bought a pretty decent 4k monitor and I can't tell the difference.

colors look a lot more vibrant. That said can't find anything with skintones

Andrew Reids LUTs and in camera profile seem like a good option.

will you actually use 8k? or better question have a PC that could handle it

I don't know if a camera can perform well at 25,000 iso I think low light king is worthy or at least low light prince ?

I've found lavs are often better than inexperienced boom operators (for example, hey I got my friend here to do handle the boom?)

I tend to agree with the list. Of course many youtubers are watched mostly for their persona and not the content itself, including many people I watch. Depends on what you are making.

Heck yeah

Stuff like this seems to be great for limited crew style setups. I feel like professionals already have everything down pat so most of these advancements aren't really that useful.

Hey man the Black Magic pocket 4k is a POC let alone a 2mm sensor iphone.

Very nice! Gonna be looking to expand my lighting kit soon.

Yeah I got a 20,000mah one. Hoping it will last 8 hours

Nice, I was considering going the Vmount battery route, but I went with USB-C power as well.

Is it that loud that it would ruin a wedding shoot?

Hot lights are pretty cheap tho! Got a 1k for like $100. Just saw an Arri 6k HMI for $1000. Have to be able to power it though lol

Isn't shooting at base ISO pretty standard practice in cinema? The Pocket is nice for most applications. Lighting day time stuff is honestly a bigger pain than nighttime. At least its manageable on a small budget vs trying to compete with daylight.

I've seen people getting good results with the 1.4 lenses on the XT3.

Seems like RED's aren't any worse in low light than any other of the cameras usually used in Cinema productions? I tend to obsess over low light capabilities, but as long as you have decent lighting 1600 ISO and fast lenses makes the cut for most situations.