thebrothersthre3

My reasoning is that 4k is twice the resolution of 1080p. So if the camera can process 4k it should be able to record two 1080 frames at the same time. Maybe have a software plugin that processes them in post if the camera can't do it. I think the GoPro does this with some of its stabilization. I am not a technician just guessing.

I don't really think a small body is feasible with full frame IBIS and being able to process full frame 4k 10bit or 4k 60p while managing heat properly.

In my experience they are basically impossible to manual focus at least if you are pulling focus for a moving shot. Focus throw is either way to long or too short. Thats with the 50mm f2, 23mm f2, 18-55mm, and 50-230mm This is pretty much standard across all brands though. I have a set of vintage lenses I use for manual focusing.

I kind of doubt it considering the handicaps.

For the price point its good though. Flog is not ideal but its useful to have. I highly doubt they'll put 4k 60p in. As a hobbyist how often do you need the unlimited record times? I'd definitely like to see it become a standard in cameras though heat limitations might be holding them back. 10 bit out with an external recorder is a great option though. Hoping they'll have All-I like the XH1, though I don't know if it actually makes a difference on these cameras. I am sure the price on this will drop to $800 in a couple months like the XT3 dropped in price. Which is cool. If we compare it to the competition mainly the A6400 it has better stills frame rates(a lot better), twice the bitrate in video, cinema 4k and 2k, way better 1080 and high speed options, half the rolling shutter in 4k and the option to record 10 bit externally. The eterna profile is hard to beat in 8 bit. That said the new Sony human tracking is a huge feature.

Doing that test with the XT3 would probably yield the same results.

Longer videos make more money. That said I actually like them you just have to have a critical mind watching ?

I found dynamic range on even aps-c Sony a6300 sensor to be great. I remember being able to shoot my black cat against a bright window. By underexposing and bringing up shadows I was able to keep all the window information as well as the cat looking exposed properly. Looked almost like a dual exposure image.

Sounds like a headache. not enough quality control when it comes to precision alignment In certain manufacturers have kept me from buying certain lenses.

If they increase the crop and sell it at 6k that will be a joke. But I guess that's Canon.

I personally like big bodies. But a hell of a nice LCD is a must have for anything above 2k. A mirrorless 1Dx mk2 with Clog and no crop in 4k will be a dream camera with 10 bit out.

I mean glass is a bit limited right now but that will soon be solved. Plus you can adapt older manual lenses with the great IBIS

The body is outdated. I probably would not buy one even if I had the money.

Will cleaning make the lenses sharper? As long as you store them in the right humidity no fungus can grow.

I'd only use the face eye tracking for single subject close ups. This looks useful for almost anything. Awesome

Too bad the 1d body is heavy and outdated. But I guess if you're paying that much for a camera an external monitor isn't going to be a big issue

Seems like a lot of cameras should have the processing power to do this in 1080 at least.

200 mpbs ain't bad. At least they included F-log. The xh-1 had moire issues in 1080p 24, 60, and 120 more than the XT2, hopefully the XT30 doesn't share the problem. Auto focus is a big advantage though not everyone needs it. 10 bit out on such a cheap camera is cool. Too bad sony didn't do that for the A6400.

No mention of 10 bit

hehe Still not bad for those who want Canon. Its something.

I'll keep that in mind too. It probably won't see a ton of heavy use outside of long recording sessions which I rarely do. I will definitely use it on short films though. Maybe I'll fall in love with RAW and be using it all the time though.

They called you a f**k up? Thats a bit rough. What did you do to them lol

True, I am often amazed at the quality of the photos on my old Google pixel, then I remember I am viewing them on a tiny screen. The dynamic range probably looks 10 times more clean as well as the low light noise.

What about audio? I don't know cell phone form factor is kind of a pain imo. Would be great for vloggers.

I'd be pretty happy with 18-110mm f4