Video Hummus

Time for a weekend holiday with your GFX100 for some fresh air

I’m also thinking the R5 makes more sense. I wonder if sony is scrambling to put in recording limits and temperature limits in their firmware that are 15-20 mins above what the R5 has now 😂 for the A7SIII. If the rolling shutter on the R5 is good in the 4K pixel-binned modes then there is enough recording options to work around the RS and temperature recording limits. Youtube videos can use the pixel binned 4K modes on the R5 and no one will notice or care. Use the 8K RAW for short challenging high DR scenes. Use the 4K120p and 4K HQ for short clips that need something extra. Not sure the R6 has the same flexibility even with future firmware updates.

Hopefully

That’s why its a camera conspiracy. I’ve never seen a industry like the camera industry. It’s weirdly opaque in the hardware department. Can’t tell if it’s incompetence or genius.

Indeed. Pretty much worry free AF at this point.

Looks like manual focus to me.

Yeah, so I’m not sure I see much downside in shooting in the pixel-binned modes for longer records. Save the 4K HQ oversampled mode and 8K RAW for those challenging shots. I’m also glad the R5 has the CFExpress slot. I know media is expensive but its a future proof storage medium. The A7SIII is rumored only to have SD, so probably no internal RAW, and the typical anemic sony codecs and bitrates.

Is pixel binning from 48mp on the R5 even that bad? The A7Riv pixel bins from 60mp and it looks really good. So the R5 in pixel bin mode might be worth the money over the R6

Exactly. Sony does well with DR, certainly better than Canon. I don’t know anything but I doubt they are going to regress in DR performance compared to A7iii

Yes, at least for A9 stacked sensor. The larger pixels will probably balance it out. A9 is 24MP this is half that.

Looks like a stacked 12MP sensor (could potentially be quad-bayer but unlikely stacked and quad). Same tech in A9ii just lower MP. I suspect the readout speed will be blistering with no RS problems at all. Looks good to me. FF doesn’t need a quad-Bayer sensor anyway, unless you like to shoot only in moon light. Noise performance will most likely be more than acceptable, stellar even. Now, the big question is bitrates and codec and IBIS. Will they have this outperform their FX-9 darling? Doubt it,

Dual processors being advertised...uh oh. Olympus did the same thing and they are headed for the exits. Usually means lack of funds for investing in better tech.

They do! They want you to buy CanOn C200/300/500 and hopefully we will get a new C100 or XC style RF Mount camera. There was no-way Canon was going to release an R5 with unlimited 8K/4K120p, oversampled 4K video with DPAF in all modes without some cripple hammering. Let’s get real. What they did release was excellent hybrid cameras. If anything they drew a solid line in the sand about their philosophy going forward. They very much see their Cinema line as the place to go for video work. I think its an exciting release, overheating gotchas and all.

Yes, they have had a complete package for 3 years now minus AF. You would think it would be essential for them to get it right this time... GH5 got more things right then wrong, by far. They could add PDAF, keep the current feature set and maybe add 10-bit in all modes and they would be competing with the latest cameras just released. It doesn’t have to be PDAF or whatever. It could be mythical perfect DfD system if the hunting is gone, the pulsing is not noticeable, and it tracks correctly. So for as much as 2020 has sucked ass, its shaping up to be an exciting camera year.

Looking at the body weight. R5 - 738 grams GH5 - 725 grams Both have IBIS, similar batteries. I think we know why the damn thing potential has overheating problems.

So true. 🤣

Product segmentation, perhaps? I think there has been 4 important aspects of the R5 release: 1) internal RAW took a baby step to becoming mainstream. 2) 10-bit 4:2:2 Log recording is the new baseline. 3) 4K HFR (anything higher than 60p) is the new slow motion benchmark. 4) You no longer need gloves in the winter when operating your mirrorless camera.

Yes, and almost nothing is being processed when you shooting 12-but RAW. It’s just basically wrapping it in a container and dumping it to memory card.

And charge $10,000 to get rid of the record and temperature limits. Profit!

There are other factors too. The size of the process node (40nm, 22nm, 14nm?) the CPU and ISP are made on. I suspect all the camera manufactures are behind or can’t get those chips on newer node sizes. There is a reason an IPhone 11 Pro with a Apple built A13 SoC at 7nm can do amazing things in a tiny phone. You can edit 4K video on that thing and export it faster than an IMac in some cases. All passive cooling in a form factor 20x smaller than an R5. I think the problem lies with the ISP chips that are handling the RAW data, as most of the newer cameras are using ARM based off the shelf CPUs for the UI, IO, and operating systems on the cameras. Would love to see someone open up an R5 and see what’s inside and see what they did to control heat. What chips they are using.

I’m really hoping to see some reliable AF tech in a GH6. Otherwise, depending on what the A7Siii brings I’ll be investing in either canon or Sony moving forward. Sony doesn’t inspire me as much for whatever reason.

I’m very curious of this as well. Especially the 4K modes.

Probably won’t make much of a difference. If your putting videos online to watch (most people are) then everything gets turned into IPB anyway! Perhaps the IPB source artifacts get worst when the video gets chewed up by the final IPB export.

The the act of just inserting a cable will eventually break that stupid port. So be careful.

He did a composite image at around 0:53 where he had the guy in focus but also the tent in the background. Wonderful piece of work and a reminder that its not about the f*cking gear!