MrSMW

That’s actually one of my best investments. Along with the motorhome/RV. The moho/RV saves me around €7k per annum that I am not spending on bed & board and will claw back around 35-40% of its purchase price after 10 years use. The cart will be worth fuck all after 10 years, if it even lasts that long…which I doubt, but every wedding I use it at (which is almost all of them) it’s been invaluable. Single trip from van to somewhere convenient within the venue with all my kit loaded up which otherwise would be 3-4 walking trips each end of the day. Last job of the year it’s going to be especially useful as it’s nearly 1km from the closest parking to the church with no drop off opportunity as the roads are too tiny and I can’t get close. But I can trundle my trolley 2km. Kind of…

Do they? I don't know, - rhetorical Q! I didn't like it as much as FF/S35 Lumix, but probably never gave it enough time. I suspect in isolation or with enough time to understand and work with it, there would have been little to no discernible difference?

I know a few enjoy my occasional kit ramble and as I have often said, I do like good kit, but do not collect 'toys' for the sake of it. Plus I am actually a minimalist at heart and if I could only own one camera and one lens, I would! But if my update rambles help other folks in some of their own choices, then good. 20-40 f2.8 28-75 f2.8 G2 70-180 f2.8 G2 As far as I am aware, the smallest and lightest and greatest range of f2.8 zooms available from any manufacturer. One of my 'criticisms' of Nikon is rebadging the original versions and charging more for them, but I digress... Sigma do an excellent 16-28 f2.8 I had for a season, but I found it just a bit too wide and two of my 'favourite' focal lengths are 20mm and 40mm making the widest of my zooms, absolutely perfect for my needs. It weighs only 365g which is super light for such a great lens which in crop mode, is still a fantastic 30-60mm lens. I have the 28-70mm f2.8 from Sigma since it's launch and it's been my workhorse in both stills and more recently, video use. At 470g compared with your more typical 24-70 weighing in at anything from 750-1000, again, it's a lightweight gem. It remains firmly in it's current role as primary run & gun video lens. The Tamron version the 28-75mm f2.8 replaced the above as my primary stills lens this year and it's been superb. Some folks prefer a wider 24mm, but not me and it may be only 4mm, but I just don't get on with the 24mm focal length and prefer 28mm as my 'medium wide'. The 'extra' 5mm at the long end is also a bonus. It's slightly heavier than the Sigma at 540g, but that is still lightweight for what it is. Paired with the A7RV, it's an insanely good combo at approx 1350g including Smallrig baseplate either as a full 61mp unit, or as a 42-110mm 26mp set up. And finally the 70-180mm f2.8 G2 weighing in at just 855g. OK, it gives up 20mm at the long end, but I could not care less as it's both lighter and a stop faster than my Lumix 70-200mm f4 and all 70-200mm f2.8's are typically 1250-1500g in L Mount which is considerable on a camera body, especially without a battery grip. That has been one of my big issues with L Mount, - I always needed a battery grip to balance those bigger zooms but that just added even more weight and pushed units run hand well over 2.5kg which all day long is just a bit too much! Summary, - absolutely zero criticisms of these Tamron lenses. They just do exactly what I want and need them to do and we could always wish for even more compact and lighter, but they are IMO, the finest range of zoom lenses currently available for me today. But what about those 35-150 f2/2.8 options available from Tamron and Samyang? Considered but just too big and heavy and external zooming. Either would require a battery grip for me to use and as with those 70-200's, just even more bulk so just no. The only advantage of one of these and slight criticism of my current trio of zooms is it would save on changing lenses, but the way I work, this happens so infrequently, it's not an issue... 28-75mm from start of day until start of ceremony. Change to 70-180 for ceremony and then back to 28-75 until speeches when it's back to 70-180 with final switch to end the day to 20-40 for dancing which is just 4 actual lens changes in a typical 12 hour shoot. It's not an issue. I would however be interested in a similar sized and performing sibling to the new Sigma 28-45mm f1.8. If Sigma bring out something like a 45-90mm f1.8 version of this lens, I would consider swapping the Tamron trio for just these 2 lenses. OK they are bigger and heavier, but do not require a battery grip and the extra quality and capability combined with the cropping ability of the A7RV would make this duo very viable. But as the latter lens does not exist...

M4/3? For video yes. For stills no, but cost... I know there are cheaper options, but I wouldn't consider anything less than 3x GH7 and the fast f1.8 zooms so again, cost just kills it. And to be honest, I'm not especially interested in going back to M4/3, but it was a consideration. I've considered everything basically. Except the Komodo et al.

But being serious, I had to rule out Canon completely due to cost and ideally I would have kept things totally L Mount, but even if an S1H or S2R appears by the end of this season, the glass just is not there yet for my needs. That new Sigma 28-45 f1.8 would make a great workhorse…up to ‘50’ but then anything longer such as a 70-200 is just massive. I popped the f4 version of that lens on my S1H and handed it to my wife today and then the Z6ii with Tamron 70-180. The former weighs 2.42kg and the latter 1.21kg which is exactly 50%. Swap out the Z6ii for the vastly more capable (than the Z6ii or S1H) A7RV and the weight remains about the same…and that is the heaviest combo in my revised arsenal. The S9 combo will be under 1kg compared with my current S5ii set up which is approx 1.7kg. The pair of S5ii’s including lenses and battery grips are approx 1.5kg each but will live on tripods other than for transportation. These are considerable weight savings considering my 3 current ‘on me’ working units added up to: 1.3kg + 1.6kg + 1.8kg = 4.7kg Compared with what very shortly be: 1kg + 1.3kg = 2.3kg, ie, <50% Nerdy numbers aside, the weight saving alone is huge, but then factor in having to juggle just 2 units instead of 3 and with vastly increased stills capacity with the stills unit of that pairing. Or I could rig out a Komodo and employ sherpas to lug my gear and operate the follow focus. If any of them are not too busy also doubling as my son et lumière team… Fuji could have done it all with 3x XH2’s and a single XH2, but the less than stellar AF puts me off. Plus it would be starting from scratch and the cost would have been mucho. What about going full Sony and flipping all the L Mount? Cost. Could have done it with a pair of FX30’s plus an FX3 on top of the A7RV for stills, but even more mucho costo over Fuji and what I have gone for.

It was out of stock and I was so high on crystal meth, I couldn’t be bothered to look any further. Then just forgot about it. Until just now, but hey ho, next time maybe?

I was just watching a camera review and the fella was saying that the camera had train detect AF but who videos trains? People, birds and butterflies and cars but trains. I’ll pass your details on to him 😉

Well I have been using it with the S5ii since they added it in firmware a month or so back and it’s getting close to double I think, but not quite, compared with say 4k 25/30p in full frame. With the wide end of my 28-70, the 4k 50/60p equates to 42mm and with the ‘gimbal’ IBIS setting, 50’ish? Pretty sure the exact figure is in that S9 thread fairly early on so go check there?

And PS, I'm not laughing at you, but laughing at the imaginary scenario where as a one man band hybrid shooter, I attempt to juggle 3x zero IBIS or AF cameras that weigh about 5x as much and cost about that also. If not more. I also 'dismissed' anything from BM, the Sony Burano and the Alexa LF.

I didn’t dismiss it because it wasn’t even in the conversation. It would be like, “OK, you were shopping around for a hot hatchback circa €15k on the used market, why didn’t you consider a lightly used €75k Porsche Cayenne?” Pair of bare bones S5ii and a single under 1kg with lens S9 vs 3x rigged out Red Komodo? No offense, but it would be an utter fucking nightmare! 😂

Will do for sure. It wasn’t even on my radar and I didn’t even know it was coming until a few days prior to the big Japan launch and even then, initially dismissed it as I was not looking for a ‘content creators’ tool and there was so much negativity…but enough positivity from some of the actual filmmakers who attended. For stills, nah. For ‘proper’ filmmaking, nah. But for what I am interested in which is basically a smaller and lighter S5ii, bingo! So it very rapidly became of interest to me. Having extensive use of the S5ii, I can’t see it as being anything but that smaller & lighter unit that suits my needs.

Well I can’t do that for at least another month as I think the release date is 23rd July? At least in Europe and then with delivery, might even be early Aug… I don’t shoot in any of those modes but can certainly try them for you at some point. I think there’s an equation for the ‘gimbal-like’ crop IBIS mode and I think that info is on the S9 topic? Fortunately, for my needs, I don’t think I will have any heat related issues, A. because I will never be shooting more than 10 second clips with it and B. never had an overheating issue with a Lumix camera before but including the OG S5 which if I remember correctly, lacked the vents of the S5ii? Never even had a warning or heard anything from any unit, ever, even in 40+ in the shade, full sun, 30+ minute conditions. Goes back to consistency and trusting your kit. I trust Lumix for anything like this because it has proved itself time and time again to be as good as it gets. Unlike those flakes over at *cough* Canon 😜

And as I was saying before I rudely interrupted myself, the A7RV was always lurking in the wings. Fantastic stills camera with option of 60mp full frame super-detailed files but ability to shoot 26mp crop at a slightly higher res than 24mp FF cameras. That's flexibility! AF is just best in class. Rear screen is superb in both resolution and how it rotates and tilts etc. All 3 Tamron lenses are native so all niggles re. performance, reliability and corrections etc removed. It's tiny for what it is and so fits with my mantra of 'smaller, lighter, faster'. My only criticism is it takes a stoopid cfexpress type A card, but hey ho, I got a 500GB for €270 so can't really complain... So in summary, happy days. The proof of the pudding as they say is in the eating and that will be the rest of this season, but as far as I am concerned, I have now removed every issue I previously had to juggle or deal with, whether it be cameras, or lenses, or audio, or lighting or tripod heads sagging or gimbals having an electronic jerking fit mid shoot, all whilst sweating profusely on a 35+ degree Celcius French Summers day. Not that we have head any of those this year. Yet... To conclude, anyone that is interested, feel free too ask anything.

Hello 🤗 For those that are interested, finally, I reached 'peak camera' for my needs. When I say 'peak camera' I really mean 'peak set up' which includes; camera bodies, lenses, audio gear, tripods, etc, ie, 'everything' I need to do my job. My job is a multi-day coverage, destination wedding, hybrid shooter and has been for the last 24 years, the most recent 22 full-time and the hybrid part for the last 14. It's been a real battle these last 14 years as a one man band to get that balance of kit that allows for 3 factors: A. Creativity, not stifled by... B. operating issues which could be anything from too many units, to too big & heavy, through ergonomics to...well anything that is more operational and logistical. C. Repeatable consistency at or above a certain level. I haven't tried every combo known to man because that would be impossible, but far too many to mention, but as above, 100% confident I have now reached 'peak set up'. As the title suggest, that is a combo of principally Lumix and Sony for bodies, Lumix, Sigma and Tamron for lenses, Rode for audio, Smallrig for cages/grips and tripods. Specifically: My previous set up to date was: 1 static video + 1 roaming/semi-static video + 2 photo It's now 2 static video + 1 roaming video + 1 photo So it's still a 4 unit set up, but with two considerable exceptions: A. Instead of 1 static and 3 cameras on my person, I now only ever have 2 on me, which is a big deal. B. Both of those units on me are smaller and lighter than they previously were, which adds even further in significance because smaller & lighter = faster, more creative and less fatigue. I did want to go to a 3 unit set up and it's possible, but it's just that one step too complicated and financially starts getting very silly, so just a no. I'm sticking with L Mount for video. For my needs, whether static or roaming handheld with IBIS and no gimbal, it just works for me. The output is very high quality and the log footage is very easy to work with and the file sizes not stupidly large. A used pair of S5ii's are doing the business here. One I already had and has been my workhorse since it came out last year and the other just arrived with a pair of used (most of my gear I buy used if and when I can) battery grips as during longer ceremonies and speeches, a single battery gets me concerned whereas two I have no concerns over. A brand spanking new S9 is inbound next month. Until then, the S1H will solider on until it arrives but then sadly, has to go as it will be surplus to requirement. Sadly, because it's the best camera I have ever owned (to date) for video and stills. OK, it does not have the AF of the S5ii, but otherwise kicks its arse everywhere. But gathering dust serves no purpose and it cannot do what the S9 can do at a fraction of the size and weight so... And for stills? Well that's the Sony, obviously. A7RV. It was always an option lurking in the wings which is why even though I went back to Nikon with the Zf and Z6ii earlier this year purely for stills, I did so with adapted E Mount Tamron glass so that I could go either direction, remain with Nikon or go Sony, any time I felt. That time is now and Sony won. Z9? Too big and heavy and not 100% convinced by the e only shutter. Probably would have been fine, but it's a MASSIVE LUMP. Z8? Nah. I'd rather have a Z9 as there are too many compromises with the Z8 IMO, but see above. The Zf I have? Nope. Ergonomic pig to use. Z6ii? Nope, too slow. It's like wading through mud operating that thing, unlike the Zf which is fast, but ergonomically shite. Z6iii? I thought it was going to be but I am having a few niggling issues with the adapted E Mount Tamron lenses. They work well enough most of the time, but not ALL the time. They do require more processing work as they are not native. Posted in error so with only a brief opportunity to edit, will have to continue in another post below!

Same as the S1H is so overlooked as a photo camera on-line. Stuff gets pegged and few look beyond the norm and I am sure the OM1 is a highly capable video camera in the right hands. I probably dismissed it too soon because SOOC, it was not as good as my S1H. Well it probably wasn’t go to be and ultimately probably never could be, but absolutely stuffs it in other areas such as; AF, size, weight etc… I personally like things that are less mainstream and like using combos of things few others do such as: OM-1 for video, S1H for stills, Nikon bodies with adapted E Mount Tamron lenses…

What I meant was you can’t have everything in one body and there is always a compromise somewhere whether it’s the; AF, IBIS, ergos, anything etc… so as always, pick what are the most important qualities amd be prepared to accept some compromises.

The conclusion that I came to when I briefly owned the OM-1, was that the Panny had better video capability and quality, but I’d have preferred that in the OM-1 body which I think is the better body. Also FAR better AF with Oly, if that is a requirement. Unfortunately, as with so many things, you can’t have both! Today, I’d go GH7 for sure because for me, the video quality would beat the use ability edge that I think the OM series has. But that would just be my preference… For stills I’d go Oly. For hybrid I’d go Oly. Pure video useage, I’d ride The Pony of Hope.

3 things I am bored with either in principal or because I’ve been doing it myself and am tired of it. 1. Anamorphic. Never tried it but despise those blue light streaks and those curved edges. In the words of the great sage Gollum, go away and don’t ever come back. Unless it’s without those stoopid light streaks and the edges are straight. 2. Slow motion everywhere, all the time, for the sake of slow motion. Guilty 🤷‍♂️ However, it can have it’s place and I will not totally desist, but it’s much more sporadic these days. 3. Shallow DOF for the sake of shallow DOF, everywhere, all the time. Not guilty but still partial to some shallow DOF for specific reasons at specific times as I feel fit. But those folks who say shoot an entire wedding at f1.4 from start to finish? Well they belong with those monkeys who think shooting the entire thing with just a 24mm lens is ‘artistic’. I call it muppetry.

7 easily. For me. Never personally owned any of them though!

The GH7 thread turned into a ‘discussion’ about sensor sizes, magic and all kinds of stuff, so I thought maybe we could derail this one with some boring old M4/3 GH7 talk? I’m joking 🙃 Everything else being equal, I think there’s a certain ‘look’ the larger the sensor. I can never quite put my finger on it and nor can I always spot it, but I believe it’s ‘a thing’.

Can we talk about the GH7 in this thread?

Which is a scenario I have considered, ie, book a 2 week bucket list trip to Japan and upon arrival, buy the new camera, bin the packaging, shoot the shit out of it, come home. And not pay the UK/EU import duty because we already get slammed for enough tax as it is so they can do one. And if any tax officials from the UK or EU are reading this, I do not actually have a flight booked and you can fuck off even if I did 😜

Well I go through phases of different combos and actually mostly use a Spider Holster belt AND a twin harness. The beauty of the hip set up is the weight is off your neck & upper back and on your hips, but with the added bonus that if you miss the Spider holster slot, the camera does not drop and smash into 62 bazillion pieces on the concrete floor, but dangles at the end of the strap instead. Plus you can push the camera against the strap for added stability. But…I don’t really like the harness system because it’s not great with a white linen shirt. Sooooo I have been using a 2 camera system on non-wedding days and my white linen shirts and then on wedding days, adding the harness over a navy blue shirt for that third camera. But going forward, that harness is now going into retirement as it’s strictly 2 cameras on me; one video and one stills with those other 2, strictly static. This allows me the illusion of being George Clooney at a wedding rather than a photographer at George Clooney’s wedding. And yes, I have also operated more than 4 cameras on a job… One ceremony, I had 7 🤪 Pair of GH5ii’s on a single tripod at the rear, one wide, one long. 3x Go Pros, one front left, one front right, one high up rear to one side in a tree. 2x stills cameras. Utter madness and never repeated, but you try shit and it seemed like a good idea right up until the point where it became a reality shit show 😂

I have juggled with so many combos, some of which have worked better than others and as a one man band, it always comes down to the same thing, - what is the max that you can do, and consistently, without tripping over yourself. The potential issue with 'minimalism' is that often there is no back up, but too much kit and as above, you risk over-complicating and tripping yourself up. Having 2 identical static video units being fed from 4 audio feeds is minimal set up, but maximum insurance. With a third roaming run & gun video unit, there is also extensive variety. Keeping it all within the L Mount family, adds a 4th option with the S1H being stills, but at a flick of a switch, becoming video. It's also the path of least investment financially and the fact that it is the least compromised option right now, it just makes utter sense. So I can carry 3 units on me (one each hip and one on a strap), but it's too much, especially when it was 3 different cameras re. ergos etc. There are still certain minimum's even applying the KISS principal, but this is as KISS as things can be for my needs. The S9 would never have worked in a 3 unit set up because of that limited recording time, but for several hundred 10 second clips spread over a typical 20+ hour job, perfect. Tiny Smallrig cage on it's way and will probably stick a small side handle on the side for handling purposes and even with Rode Micro shotgun, we're still talking well under 1kg for a 6k 30p Open Gate set up with near gimbal like stability, and that's a bit bonkers.

The decision has been made and the deed has been done, - I am once again fully L Mount. My return to Nikon for stills, was brief but hey ho. What have I just done? Put my Nikon Zf, Z6ii and 3x adapted E Mount Tamron lenses to one side for the moment and after I get back from my next trip, both of the Nikon bodies will be sold. The S1H has moved (once again) and back into the stills role, losing the battery grip as part of that process. This thing is supposed to be 'The Video One', and it is, but also a highly underrated stills camera that benefits (IMO) from having that OLPF. I've just ordered another (used S5ii) so will now be operating a pair of them, statically, for video usage, both paired with the 'cheapie' 20-60mm 'kit' lens and each with a Rode WG2. The final component for this year will be an S9. The S9 will be my run & gun lightweight unit paired up with the S1H for stills as my 'on me at all times' pairing. My only slight issue with this set up is that it remains a 4 unit scenario and I was determined to go to 3 units, but I can live with it as 2 of the units are identical static units. My previous issue had been 1 static and 3x units on me which was too much. Resolved that. Future? I'm waiting on any S1H/S1R replacement, expected towards the end of this year and for 2025 season. That will determine whether I retire the S1H and replace it with something more up to date, or I flip it for a Sony A7RV and use my 3x Tamron lenses. This Sony + Tamron is actually the dark horse in all this and currently is the best set up for stills and the more likely scenario because L Mount still does not have the glass for me. If within L Mount they do bring out a sibling to the new Sigma 28-45mm f1.8 such as a 45-90mm f1.8 or an f2.8 compact rival to the Tamron/Samyang 35-150, it will swing back in favour of keeping an all L Mount set up. But S9, preordered. Didn't see that coming but it actually makes huge sense.