Henchman
Members-
Posts
121 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Everything posted by Henchman
-
I have several DIY Variable Diopters made from Century optics WA 0.8x wide angle adapters. I did a test tonight, and realized that the WA adapter changes the flares, and in fact mutes them a bit. I am thinking of removing the coating on one, and was wondering should I start with the front element.
-
It was worse than the one in the picture below. (Which I'll also be polishing) and now it looks like the other picture.
-
I'm going to post there when I get out of Facebook jail. 😀 I'm also going to shoot a little video comparing flares with direct light
-
After reading a facebook post in the vintage lens group, where a member asked about polishing a lens with damaged coatings on the front element, and where the responses were basically, "throw it in the garbage", I decided to make a quick comparison video of 2 moller 32/2 lenses I have. One is in perfect condition. The other was one I picked up for cheap. When it arrived, the front lens cleaning marks were so excessive, it was truly unusable. So I decided to try polishing it. I used diamond polishing compound 14000 grit, and a dremel with a polishing tool. Look at the video and tell me which one of these lenses is unusable, and should be thrown in the garbage.
-
Or you could make a DIY variable diopter using a WA lens.
-
-
Have you thought of creating a repository for lens profiles?
-
So, I will be shooting a ultra low budget in the new year, and a lot of it takes place in a hotel size room, that will be low light for the look of intimacy. Now, to get the widest Anamorphic setup, I have been experimenting. My setup for the wide angle shots is going to be my gold Isco Ultrastar. Home made single focus VD using a 0.8 wide angle converter. And my 50mm f/ 1.4 super Takumar with an ef adapter on a 0.71 speedbooster. Correct me if I'm wrong on my calculations. This gives me the same FOV, but faster, as a 35mm f2 lens but without the speedbooster. Which is 28mm. Correct?
-
Short video of test shots with the BMPCC 4K Lens was wide open as it was quite dark in the room. https://youtu.be/WArcKh-lXWY
-
Heads up. Tilta has a deal on their motor. $135 https://tilta.com/shop/nucleus-nano-motor-kit-i/ But you can get an open box system from them as well for $171 https://tilta.com/shop/nucleus-nano-wireless-lens-control-system-open-box/
-
I should have specified I was meaning using the autofocus with a bmpcc 4k
-
But, would it be able in the future to use the motor of an autofocus in combination wiht a gear for the Anamorphic scope. Just an Idea.
-
Now, what if one wants to use a lens that has autofocus in combination with a single motor. Is that possible?
-
wow. that's amazing
-
Ok, so I just want to make sure I understand. If I set the focus calibration of a near and distant point on both lenses. Will it track everything inbetween?
-
Have you done tests with a dual focus anamorphic setup?
-
What's peoples experiences here with the Tilta follow focus motors? Will the N be good enough?
-
I think it would be pretty easy to adapt it to a 15mm rod mount without using a big heavy clamp.
-
BTW, will the AI be a software add-on, or hardware. And what do you see the additional cost being?
-
Got mine ordered. Hope delivery will stay on schedule. I have a no budget feature I'm starting in the New Year that this will be perfect for.
-
I picked up a Nominar 25mm/f0.95 Cine Super lens. Anyone familiar with these?
-
Decided to pick up a Nikon AIS 28mm f/2.8 for $160
-
And that's exactly why I was asking for f2 or faster suggestions. So when I'm shooting in low-light conditions, I can still stop down a 1.4 lens to 2.8 and know I'll have a sharper image than using a 2.8 lens, wide open. And since this is for filmmaking, I'm mostly concerned about the center of the image anyway. The Voigtlander is very sharp wide open at f/1.4.
-
Question: "What's your favorite non-alcoholic drink?" Kye: "Gin and Tonic'