Want to tell Panasonic how to improve the GH3? Take my GH3 poll!

[QuickHitRecord]

Please take a moment to vote:

[url="http://kwiksurveys.com/app/showpoll.asp?sid=ftrgvl7xb4iso8j21673&qid=21673"]http://kwiksurveys.c...=21673&new=True[/url]

At the $1300 price point, 770 votes would represent a potential million dollars in sales for Panasonic. If this poll gets enough participation, I will draft an open letter to Panasonic with the results.

If you are interested in using the GH3 as a filmmaking tool, please cast a vote and share this with your fellow filmmakers.

[Chrad]

For me, the number one addition that's necessary is worldcam support. Seems that's against Panasonic's strategy, so I'll be waiting for the hack (fingers crossed) to add support for all the framerates before I pick one up.

[QuickHitRecord]

There's an "other" option where you can write in Worldcam.

[Axel]

There is no multiple choice. I wrote: No more banding, but actually I want it all. My sign is that of the tyrannosaurus rex, the mythic animal that stands for modesty.

[haarec]

This poll is a great idea. I have already voted, but let me say it here. In addition to the first choice (moire filter) please let us have all the framerates - 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps - to choose from. The length limit of a clip (29 minutes in Europe) does not matter, but we should not be sentenced to just 25/50 fps.

[QuickHitRecord]

I thought that it already was: http://www.eoshd.com/content/9011/the-panasonic-gh3-is-here

[Chrad]

The wording in promo material at Photokina seemed to hint that you have the choice between 24p/30p/60p (NTSC) 24p/25p/50p (PAL).

[haarec]

[quote name='QuickHitRecord' timestamp='1348246999' post='18831']
I thought that it already was: [url="http://www.eoshd.com/content/9011/the-panasonic-gh3-is-here"]http://www.eoshd.com...nic-gh3-is-here[/url]
[/quote]

Yes, and also [url="http://***URL removed***/previews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-gh3/2"]here[/url] but I'm afraid they are about to make two versions (pal and ntsc) which is not good.