DPStewart Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 14 hours ago, kidzrevil said: The NX1 is the gift that keeps on giving man. Im really considering getting the 16-50s to get the most out of the cam... and let that be my personal kit. Anyway this was shot with a contax zeiss 45mm f2.8 and a tiffen ultra contrast filter Yeah. Normal gamma uses the picture profile you have selected for stills Man KIDZ.... Your sense of style just gets better and better. I haven;t been around here much lately because my NX1 is just WORKIN'. Ya know what I mean? I put in Andrew's whole LUG-LUT settings and post routine, and it's just been GREAT. So nothing to report. But RICARDO... Boom! You've really tapped into an interesting recipe here. I've put in your settings and shot a few things and I agree - very nice. A different feel than the EOS Log-LUT thing, but I like them both. Once I've shot a bit more with Ricardo's set and got to know it better - then I'll have two distinct looks out of the NX1. I think the NX1 screams with the Sigma ART lenses, but boy I'd still love to have that 16-50S lens to really finish the deal. And I was RIGHT! Back when the camera got knocked out of production, I KNEW the prices for those "S" lenses were not going to come down.... Oh well...at least you DO get what you pay for with them. ~Cheers all! sandro, tokhee, kidzrevil and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 @DPStewart thanks bro ! And you are right, the sigma lenses like the 18-35 look really good on the NX1...its one of the best piece of optics out in general. That 16-50s has a look of its own though and its just as sharp from what I seen. Honestly @200mbps with OIS & great autofocus I dont think I'll need another cam till 10bit 422 internal becomes common in prosumer bodies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricardo_sousa11 Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 23 hours ago, DPStewart said: Man KIDZ.... Your sense of style just gets better and better. I haven;t been around here much lately because my NX1 is just WORKIN'. Ya know what I mean? I put in Andrew's whole LUG-LUT settings and post routine, and it's just been GREAT. So nothing to report. But RICARDO... Boom! You've really tapped into an interesting recipe here. I've put in your settings and shot a few things and I agree - very nice. A different feel than the EOS Log-LUT thing, but I like them both. Once I've shot a bit more with Ricardo's set and got to know it better - then I'll have two distinct looks out of the NX1. I think the NX1 screams with the Sigma ART lenses, but boy I'd still love to have that 16-50S lens to really finish the deal. And I was RIGHT! Back when the camera got knocked out of production, I KNEW the prices for those "S" lenses were not going to come down.... Oh well...at least you DO get what you pay for with them. ~Cheers all! Im currently testing some new settings to get different types of look, will share later I think this camera shines when you put the 16-50S on it, I've had the 18-35mm Sigma and I dont think its as good as the Samsung lens. I do love the 35mm f1.4 though. MountneerMan and Pavel Mašek 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homestar_kevin Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Great work here guys! If you guys are after the 16-50s, I just wanted to point out that it looks like samsungparts still has some of them. If you guys remember that dpreview thread with all the lenses being available for cheap from the samsung parts site, some of those deals are still available. The 16-50s is $800 new. There is no lens hood included, though it can be ordered separately for like $16 if i remember. This is how I got my 16-50 when this was first brought to light. Here's the link if anyone wants it http://www.samsungparts.com/Products/Parts_and_Accessories/PID-AD97-23876A.aspx Seemingly sketchy site, but I've bought multiple lenses from them and have had good experiences. Pavel Mašek and MountneerMan 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountneerMan Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 On 9/22/2016 at 9:42 AM, cojocaru27 said: Normal gamma, and mostly Ricadro's settings. Enjoy : I will have to give Ricardo's setting a try when I get some free time. One more question @cojocaru27, was this shot with the bitrate hack? 3 hours ago, homestar_kevin said: Great work here guys! If you guys are after the 16-50s, I just wanted to point out that it looks like samsungparts still has some of them. If you guys remember that dpreview thread with all the lenses being available for cheap from the samsung parts site, some of those deals are still available. The 16-50s is $800 new. There is no lens hood included, though it can be ordered separately for like $16 if i remember. This is how I got my 16-50 when this was first brought to light. Here's the link if anyone wants it http://www.samsungparts.com/Products/Parts_and_Accessories/PID-AD97-23876A.aspx Seemingly sketchy site, but I've bought multiple lenses from them and have had good experiences. Do they have any 50-150S lens? and how much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homestar_kevin Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Nah, the 50-150 S sold out from them very fast last year, I couldn't buy it from them. I had tried, but it was backordered and the backorder was never fulfilled. I ended up grabbing a 50-150 S at b&h right when they discontinued everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmyturntable Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Switched from using Gamma DR to Gamma C. Here is a screenshot from some footage I'm working on now. Gamma C, -1 Saturation, -10 Sharpness, -3 Contrast, +10 MB level. Graded with IWLTDAP Seona LUT @ 45%. Used 15% Gorilla Grain, Fine. kidzrevil and Liam 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 gamma c -10 sharpness (im going to stick with -5 or -3 from now on) -4 saturation,-3 contrast,+8mp ,0-255 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cojocaru27 Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 15 hours ago, MountneerMan said: I will have to give Ricardo's setting a try when I get some free time. One more question @cojocaru27, was this shot with the bitrate hack? Do they have any 50-150S lens? and how much yes, with the hacked bitrate thanks and kudos to @vasile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Tecno Posted September 27, 2016 Share Posted September 27, 2016 Any news from Vasile, btw? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamoui Posted September 29, 2016 Share Posted September 29, 2016 This was from a recent trip to Scotland and Iceland. NX1 with vasile's hack. 160mbps for 4k 25p and 1080p 25p/50p/100p. 4k downscaled to 1080p during Rocky Mountains conversion to ProRes HQ. Rokinon 12mm f2, Canon FD 24mm f2, Canon FD 50mm f1.4 Gamma C with sharpness -10, all other settings default. 16-235 color space. Actually, Master Pedestal may have been +15, can't remember OSIRIS M31 Rec709 LUT at 50%-75% depending on the clip. No Sharpness added in post. Rendered as a 2048 X 1080 ProRes LT file. Screengrab from 2048 x 1080p timeline, upscaled to 4096 X 2160 in Mac Preview app just to see how it held up to the upscale. Looks pretty good on my 1080p monitor. Anyone have a 4k monitor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmyturntable Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Finalized my latest video...went with the SEDONA LUT on most of them... kidzrevil and Kisaha 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Tecno Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Timmy, what are your starting settings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmyturntable Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 @Marco Tecno Gamma DR, Color Red/Blue @ 1.0 and Green @ .95, Saturation -1, Sharpness -10, Contrast -3, Master Black 10, Luminance 16-235 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmyturntable Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Finally got a chance to take the camera out and about over the weekend. Here is our latest movie from a visit to the Pumpkin Patch. Same in camera settings as last time: Gamma DR, Color Red/Blue @ 1.0 and Green @ .95, Saturation -1, Sharpness -10, Contrast -3, Master Black 10, Luminance 16-235 Kisaha and Marco Tecno 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sten Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 26 minutes ago, timmyturntable said: Finally got a chance to take the camera out and about over the weekend. Here is our latest movie from a visit to the Pumpkin Patch. Same in camera settings as last time: Gamma DR, Color Red/Blue @ 1.0 and Green @ .95, Saturation -1, Sharpness -10, Contrast -3, Master Black 10, Luminance 16-235 Nice, Blue and Pumpkin! Do you upload HEVC files to Vimeo? Can you try transcoding the HEVC file in RMMC with the teal-orange LUT n°8700 applied? https://j.mp/freeluts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmyturntable Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Hello Sten, I actually run the files through EditReady and convert the to ProRes LT 422 files. I usually just keep them in 4K and then run it through Final Cut Pro to put together the footage and apply the LUTs. Is the method you suggest the method that you use? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arourke Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I've been doing some work recently that requires very accurate colors, so I wasted a few hours cycling through all of the setting in my NX1 and a Xrite Color Checker Passport. I tested all Gamma Control (color, saturation, sharpness, contrast, hue), Picture Wizard Options, Black Level, and Luminance Levels. These were tested in Daylight, Under 90+ CRI LED lights, in ISO 100-800. Fortunately the same settings worked best across ISOs and color temps. My approach to testing was to record a clip with each variation of setting with the same white balance (using the gray card of the color checker) and then use the Color Match option in Resolve (Source Gamma sRGB, Target Gamma Rec.709, Target Color Space Rec.709, Color Temp 6500, White Level 0.9 Checked) then total the variation in percentage of color accuracy. One weird discovery was that sharpness at 0 had worse color accuracy than at -10 sharpness in Gamma Control settings. These are the settings I was able to achieve the most accurate colors with: Luminance Level 0-255 Master Black Level -5 Gamma DR { Color - 1.00Red, 0.95 Green, 1.00 Blue Saturation: -3 Sharpness: -10 Contrast: -3 Hue: 0} This does result in a overall flat look that I would then grade or apply a Rec.709 LUT to. August McCue, kidzrevil, Kisaha and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisaha Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I will try straight away (in a few days!). Thank you very much for the scientific approach. What do you think about the other profiles (especially the normal)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sten Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 1 hour ago, arourke said: I've been doing some work recently that requires very accurate colors, so I wasted a few hours cycling through all of the setting in my NX1 and a Xrite Color Checker Passport What lens did you use? Can you post an imgae of the S-Curve? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.