Administrators Andrew Reid Posted April 9, 2016 Author Administrators Share Posted April 9, 2016 I wonder what he would use instead at $5k for 4K internal, 4K raw output, 240fps, 13 stop dynamic range LOG recording, Super 35mm sensor and the added bonus of 10bit 4:2:2 internal recording?! Not to mention a built in electronically variable ND filter. A Canon?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldolega Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Not to mention the great form factor, ergonomics and the small size/weight that's able to still be used with DSLR-class accessories and support gear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ak Ns Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 9 hours ago, Andrew Reid said: I wonder what he would use instead at $5k for 4K internal, 4K raw output, 240fps, 13 stop dynamic range LOG recording, Super 35mm sensor and the added bonus of 10bit 4:2:2 internal recording?! Not to mention a built in electronically variable ND filter. A Canon?! To utilise 4k RAW u need to spend 3000$ more. 4k internal is 8bit 4:2:0...!!!? 240fps buffering!! I am definitely not going to use canon. I use sony A7s and rx10ii. they both do a great job. they both come for 3000$. RX10ii has 240fps buffering, Log recording, 4k internal, Built in ND filter and A7s has very good full HD. With this combination i was able to many jobs. I don't know how worth it is having 4k 8bit 4:2:0 and s-log3 for 6000$. May be i should use it once! 14 hours ago, BrorSvensson said: it has 10bit 422 Sorry i wrote this when i am absolutely drunk. so missed few good things. 9 hours ago, Andrew Reid said: I wonder what he would use instead at $5k for 4K internal, 4K raw output, 240fps, 13 stop dynamic range LOG recording, Super 35mm sensor and the added bonus of 10bit 4:2:2 internal recording?! Not to mention a built in electronically variable ND filter. A Canon?! I already use A7s and RX10ii combination for most of the works. they both cost me up 3000$. 4k RAW will add me 3000$ more. only thing they both don't have is 10bit 422, that too in Full hd. if its in 4k hell ya its worth every penny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ak Ns Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 I did this video using A7s and RX10ii. couldn't match both cameras few shots. May be not great video but does local job needs. tx PannySVHS and Nikkor 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerbert Floor Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Its a good video, I would have loved it a little bit darker and more playing with the light. Also screen direction wasn't optimal (when the boy was running). But it's a great spot. Ak Ns 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PannySVHS Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 7 hours ago, Ak Ns said: I did this video using A7s and RX10ii. couldn't match both cameras few shots. May be not great video but does local job needs. tx I think it is great indeed. Nice cinematic energy and beautiful to watch. Great job! Ak Ns 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now