mechanicalEYE Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 40 minutes ago, TheRenaissanceMan said: Wrong topic. Post this in the sticky "Gear For Sale" topic. While I'm aware that this isn't the "Gear for Sale" section of the forum, my comment was posted here because the Ursa mini 4k has been discussed throughout this topic. The OP: Mattias Burling details why he chose to buy a used Red One MX over other options available including the Ursa Mini, so I was just informing those within this discussion that I may have one for sale, if there was any interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_David Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 On 1/7/2016 at 3:23 PM, Ed_David said: The F35 looks the most natural, like it was shot on 35mm film. It pops - it gets the blue highlights in skintones right - it gets the motion right. It handles light like film handles light. But the Red One has a certain feel that is also quite beautiful - as you see in Mattias's test - there is something lovely about it. But, the f35 handles color as naturally as possible, so I would go for the F35 for most stuff. Unless well , if the director likes the red one look - and some days I like it better. Depends I guess on the project, but I wouldn't rule either out. I guess, for darker, sci-fi or horror type stuff, the Red One feels really good. For drama, narrative, historical, indie, etc, the F35 feels the best. I like the red one mx a lot more now. I really finally appreciate a nice high-resolution sensor, thanks to now having the Sony F65. Seeing the difference. I still like the sony f35, but I think I was overdoing it on the kool aid over at dvxuser. If anyone wants to buy my last, f35, let me know. Will get you a really good deal. It works great. andrgl 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrgl Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 23 minutes ago, Ed_David said: I still like the sony f35, but I think I was overdoing it on the kool aid over at dvxuser. If anyone wants to buy my last, f35, let me know. Will get you a really good deal. It works great. Not kool-aid, more like finely aged CCD wine. IronFilm, Ed_David, sudopera and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_David Posted May 6, 2016 Share Posted May 6, 2016 7 hours ago, andrgl said: Not kool-aid, more like finely aged CCD wine. CCD technology is definitely quite interesting, but I wish the camera was able to do raw as well. Raw would have let me use more than slog1, to take advantage of its beautiful sensor. This is the beauty of the digital bolex and ikonscope cameras - that combination I find perfect. I think, when history shines back on our industry, (not that it really will) - it will kind of show how the weird looking red one, once it shifted to the MX, did actually change the high-end camera market and made Sony eat humble pie on their 250,000 dollar F35. Kurtisso 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurtisso Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 15 hours ago, Ed_David said: CCD technology is definitely quite interesting, but I wish the camera was able to do raw as well. Raw would have let me use more than slog1, to take advantage of its beautiful sensor. This is the beauty of the digital bolex and ikonscope cameras - that combination I find perfect. I am pretty excited for whatever Digital Bolex comes up with next (whenever that happens). I really hope that CCD has even more to give, or that they explore something like QuantumFilm sensors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 I think a s35 version of the d16 sensor in a higher end body would be pretty desirable to narrative/studio/hobbyist shooters. WyattMaurer, Dave Maze and kaylee 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Maze Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 45 minutes ago, TheRenaissanceMan said: I think a s35 version of the d16 sensor in a higher end body would be pretty desirable to narrative/studio/hobbyist shooters. I talked to Elle about that at NAB. She said that would be the dream. But for now with the BMPCC speed booster you do get super 35 already and it looks great. WyattMaurer and Ed_David 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 5 hours ago, DaveAltizer said: I talked to Elle about that at NAB. She said that would be the dream. But for now with the BMPCC speed booster you do get super 35 already and it looks great. Well, it's about a 1.7x crop, which is closer to flat 35 than s35. Plus it's not a CCD, which is half the equation. I think CCD + S35 + RAW is what we're after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted May 7, 2016 Author Super Members Share Posted May 7, 2016 3 hours ago, TheRenaissanceMan said: Well, it's about a 1.7x crop, which is closer to flat 35 than s35. Plus it's not a CCD, which is half the equation. I think CCD + S35 + RAW is what we're after. Sure it's a CCD, that's one of the keys for the Bolex image. Same reason my new M8 looks so lovley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Maze Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 15 hours ago, TheRenaissanceMan said: Well, it's about a 1.7x crop, which is closer to flat 35 than s35. Plus it's not a CCD, which is half the equation. I think CCD + S35 + RAW is what we're after. Ya that's the whole point of Bolex. Raw CCD 35. What else you want? Lol. Rent one and try it out. It's a gorgeous camera. I've loved my times using it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted May 7, 2016 Share Posted May 7, 2016 25 minutes ago, DaveAltizer said: Ya that's the whole point of Bolex. Raw CCD 35. What else you want? Lol. Rent one and try it out. It's a gorgeous camera. I've loved my times using it And I love what I've seen out if it. But it's s16, not s35... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted May 8, 2016 Author Super Members Share Posted May 8, 2016 4 hours ago, TheRenaissanceMan said: And I love what I've seen out if it. But it's s16, not s35... IMO x1.7 crop with the SB is close enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 44 minutes ago, Mattias Burling said: IMO x1.7 crop with the SB is close enough. Has anyone tried using the BMPCC SB on the DB16? I'd be afraid the optics might hit the sensor glass. Dave Maze 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Maze Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 6 minutes ago, TheRenaissanceMan said: Has anyone tried using the BMPCC SB on the DB16? I'd be afraid the optics might hit the sensor glass. Yes. I posted about it a while ago in Eds thread about 1dc and bmmcc. Shot a wedding with the d16 with bmpcc speed booster and 18-35. Loved it. Did a confusing test with it too. It doesn't hit the sensor at all and digital Bolex has officially confirmed that themselves too TheRenaissanceMan and Ricardo Constantino 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted May 8, 2016 Share Posted May 8, 2016 Oh wow! I totally missed that. Got a link to any samples? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted May 8, 2016 Author Super Members Share Posted May 8, 2016 Since they are bott s16 and none of them have shutters, NDs or other stuff in front of the sensor its all good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronFilm Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Any one considering the RED ONE in 2018?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zerocool22 Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 53 minutes ago, IronFilm said: Any one considering the RED ONE in 2018?! I don't think so. The risk is high that something gets broken. + There are lots of affordable camera's out there that outspec this camera. As The mysterium-X sensor is quite old with only 12 stops of DR and dont forget the red one itself is quite clunky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hijodeibn Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 20 hours ago, IronFilm said: Any one considering the RED ONE in 2018?! RED ONE MX (forget about the first version), is an incredible camera, but it is very heavy, and there are many other options out there which are better, but if you don't mine to use a heavy camera and you get it for a very good price with all its extras (monitor, SSD, etc), then could be an option to consider, to be honest the risk something get broken is low, the camera is really a tank, just make sure you tested it before you buy it, and be sure everything is working. Emanuel 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emanuel Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Trust me, RED cameras never end outdated :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.