Administrators Andrew Reid Posted February 19, 2016 Administrators Share Posted February 19, 2016 3 hours ago, JurijTurnsek said: A6300 and NX1 are not comparable at all - the form-factor matters! If Sony had the luxury of a NX1-sized body, 4K60p would be a real possiblity (if they didn't have the FS7 to protect). A6300 should be compared to NX500 or just called a sweetspot between NX1 and NX500. That's very speculative about the 4K 60fps. Hardly think Sony is protecting the FS7. As an FS5 owner and A7S II owner I can say the consumer line already comes dangerously close to the point of toppling the image quality of their pro cameras. The A6300 is far better than the NX500. No sensor crop. LOG. Likely better low light. 6K readout. Speed Booster. I think it will outperform the NX1 or be very similar, let's wait and see... Not long now. elgabogomez 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Tecno Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Imo nx1 still has the best sensor (bsi and higher mp count) hence 4k is downscaled from slightly larger area. Almost for sure, nx1 has the best hw (a real horsepower to downscale, digitally stabilize and encode in h.265). Sony has a real log mode and possibly higher dr and lower rollong shutter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 The NX1 can also do 4K/30p. Hard to imagine the A6300 could do 4K/60p in a larger body when it can't top 25p in the current one without a significant sensor crop. I'd be more than okay with a beefier body from Sony a la GH4/NX1. Better heat dissipation, better processing, better battery life (if they stopped using the pathetically weak fw50 in everything). Cinegain and Phil A 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 The FW-50 is a great battery for the targeted audience. Sure, I get your point... For people on this board. But for the casual shooter that shoots a few shots here and there, they can go back to their a6300 in a week or two, or even a month or two and still have some battery charge. And since this camera is for those shooters, the FW-50 battery is perfect. This camera looks great on paper, but it will have the normal Sony issues and this topic will have 30 more pages discussing them when it's released. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chris Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 3 hours ago, Marco Tecno said: Imo nx1 still has the best sensor (bsi and higher mp count) hence 4k is downscaled from slightly larger area. Almost for sure, nx1 has the best hw (a real horsepower to downscale, digitally stabilize and encode in h.265). Sony has a real log mode and possibly higher dr and lower rollong shutter. BSI isn't anything special at this sensor size, if you play the DXO game the a5100 has better DR once you go higher than 3200, the new Sony sensor should be better, we'll see once it's in the wild. The NX1's DR in video is nothing special either. A true log profile in the a6300 is a huge advantage. I do think the NX2 could have really been something special with a couple years to refine the tech and make improvements, guess we'll never know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 The specs sound really good ! I just hate the ergonomics of these bodies ! Really wish they invest some of these features into the sony a-mount cameras with the traditional styled dslr bodies. Dying for a full frame a mount cam with these video innovations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norliss Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 5 minutes ago, kidzrevil said: The specs sound really good ! I just hate the ergonomics of these bodies ! Really wish they invest some of these features into the sony a-mount cameras with the traditional styled dslr bodies. Dying for a full frame a mount cam with these video innovations I hear you. Alas, I think Sony is giving (or has given) up on the A-mount DSLT cameras... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 2 minutes ago, norliss said: I hear you. Alas, I think Sony is giving (or has given) up on the A-mount DSLT cameras... Welp...there goes that. I shoot handheld so a tiny cam is out the option...for me at least Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alborat Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 First unofficial videos are coming from China...and I think that they looks superb! benymypony, Ian Edward Weir, Don Kotlos and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpr Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 For $1000 the videos look great - really need to see the low light and if it matches the A7Rii which is fantastic with a speedbooster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted February 22, 2016 Administrators Share Posted February 22, 2016 Some good tests there. Have to say both the image and AF look stunning... And very little hint of rolling shutter on the street pans. Alborat and Nikkor 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianluca Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 A6300 100p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feanorfinwe Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 A6300 vs GH4 ISO testhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Mn9vYi7M40 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Seems like some fine noise. Doesn't seem to affect midtones as much as the GH4. Able to retain better detail and color at higher ISOs. ISO3200 seems ok. ISO6400 is probably quite nicely recoverable with denoise plug-ins. Although this is YouTube compression and just 1 video, so who really knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexO Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 More samples from the same owner, looks like you could get originals here as well as reduced versions(youtube version are badly compressed): http://www.gaiamount.com/user/116/videos/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpr Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Again really impressed by the images. 6400 looks manageable. Maybe a stop behind the A7rii? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raf702 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 I'm starting to think if this is worth selling my GH4 for this. But I want to see more real world tests and reviews. Keep them coming! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chris Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Here's a side by side with the A7sII and GH4 - a6300 image is more detailed than the other two, looks good. Ian Edward Weir 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JurijTurnsek Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Also, the Metaboes AF looks very impressive: The Chris 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted February 24, 2016 Author Share Posted February 24, 2016 4 minutes ago, JurijTurnsek said: Also, the Metaboes AF looks very impressive: Holy shit that's fast, but oh wait, It's not "organic" :rofl: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.