Super Members Mattias Burling Posted February 9, 2016 Super Members Share Posted February 9, 2016 Since no one got the refrigerator in the last round I will make a quick bonus round. Also I hope others will dig around on their drives and offer us a challenge Clue: There is more than one camera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 It's film, fuji something or kodak ^^. Looks nice. If I'm wrong I want to know how you made it look like film. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted February 9, 2016 Author Super Members Share Posted February 9, 2016 Ok a clue. Not all are film. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 1st and 3rd are film... Krasnogorsk... the 2nd is Red. benymypony 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 20 minutes ago, mercer said: 1st and 3rd are film... Krasnogorsk... the 2nd is Red. Yep the second must be the digital, bust just about any camera could look like that, the lens looks vintage.The grain on the film ones looks really good, I have 35mm scans that have worse grain than that. The lens is constant? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 Actually the 3rd could be the Digital Bolex? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted February 9, 2016 Author Super Members Share Posted February 9, 2016 4 minutes ago, araucaria said: I have 35mm scans that have worse grain than that. You should Its a medium format Yashica D with Kodak Portra 400 developed at home. Probably should have added grain to the 2nd so it wouldn't have been so obvious. Its the BMPC4K with an old Pentacon 50mm wide open. Here is one from the Yashica D when I have corrected for not having a blue filter and using Ektar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 1 minute ago, Mattias Burling said: You should Its a medium format Yashica D with Kodak Portra 400 developed at home. Probably should have added grain to the 2nd so it wouldn't have been so obvious. Its the BMPC4K with an old Pentacon 50mm wide open. Haha, but man than there is nothing constant I was going to say the first was medium format, but it made no sense since it's a video forum :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted February 9, 2016 Author Super Members Share Posted February 9, 2016 1 minute ago, araucaria said: Haha, but man than there is nothing constant I was going to say the first was medium format, but it made no sense since it's a video forum :p Thought I would play a little trick to see what happens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 8 minutes ago, Mattias Burling said: Thought I would play a little trick to see what happens Evil mattias :p The blur on the window made me think of medium format, it's this ver nice blur. The highlight color gave away it's film even before I zoomed in for the grain Here's a dirty scan from Portra 400 with the Pentax 67, 75mm 2.8 AL (I might have posted this before). You can see this beautiful relation between blur and infocus (excuse the newton rings, shitty scanner without inserts) kaylee, mercer, Cinegain and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted February 9, 2016 Author Super Members Share Posted February 9, 2016 Gorgeous pic! Film still rules the galaxy. Nikkor and Volker Schmidt 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 Seriously, the amount of DR and light falloff in her hair is beautiful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 I am not knowledgeable enough to know why, but the images here are amazing. I am depressed to learn that they are mostly film, which is above my pay grade. Just fabulous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil A Posted February 9, 2016 Share Posted February 9, 2016 35 minutes ago, Jonesy Jones said: I am not knowledgeable enough to know why, but the images here are amazing. I am depressed to learn that they are mostly film, which is above my pay grade. Just fabulous. There's a reason people try to emulate film look with their digital stills work. I loved shooting 645-format Kodak Portra.Those colors are incredible and the smooth highlights, dayum! Also it's really hard to edit a digital shot to authentically make it look like shot on b&w silver halide film, the grain works just so totally different than digital noise. A few years ago there was an impressive description of how Sebastião Salgado changed from analog medium format to a DSLR (Canon 1Ds III if I remember correctly when he shot Genesis), got the images developed in RAW, but then exposed to negative film and printed like before. Crazy (and crazy expensive). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaylee Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 wow this is interesting ive been thinking about film a lot lately. the other day i ran across a box of ektachrome slides i shot years ago, and i gotta say i was shocked at how good the images looked. i havent seen anything quite like that in a long time. it was an eye opening experience so im a huge x files fan, but i think the new season looks like shit what troubles me is that the creative team is full of key people from the past... although technology does play a role, i think the bigger issue at play here is simply bad taste on the other hand, if the new season was shot on negative film, would it look very different after post? im gonna say yes. what do you guys think? after looking at these next to each other i have to say that the juxtaposition of these two images is a perfect metaphor for how i feel about contemporary cinematography in general Jonesy Jones and Marco Tecno 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 Me and my kids watch everyday on Netflix. Love the look. Haven't seen the new ones. Question, did they go with a somewhat different look somewhere around season 4, at least temporarily? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaylee Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 8 minutes ago, Jonesy Jones said: Question, did they go with a somewhat different look somewhere around season 4, at least temporarily? hmmm interesting question... not as i recall...? im curious about how it felt different... i actually had a huge netflix marathon preparing for the new series lol i think the cinematography/production design stepped up quite a bit after the first season, and edged forward from there as time went on. as a whole i feel like the look of the show changed when they moved to california... rainy foggy goth canada just fit the vibe so well, much better than constant summer socal idk. the look of the show definitely evolved but i dont remember too much of a change around that time... how would you describe it? i must be missing something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 3 hours ago, kaylee said: wow this is interesting ive been thinking about film a lot lately. the other day i ran across a box of ektachrome slides i shot years ago, and i gotta say i was shocked at how good the images looked. i havent seen anything quite like that in a long time. it was an eye opening experience so im a huge x files fan, but i think the new season looks like shit what troubles me is that the creative team is full of key people from the past... although technology does play a role, i think the bigger issue at play here is simply bad taste on the other hand, if the new season was shot on negative film, would it look very different after post? im gonna say yes. what do you guys think? after looking at these next to each other i have to say that the juxtaposition of these two images is a perfect metaphor for how i feel about contemporary cinematography in general Digital really makes redheads look older. Liam 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonesy Jones Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 6 hours ago, kaylee said: hmmm interesting question... not as i recall...? im curious about how it felt different... i actually had a huge netflix marathon preparing for the new series lol i think the cinematography/production design stepped up quite a bit after the first season, and edged forward from there as time went on. as a whole i feel like the look of the show changed when they moved to california... rainy foggy goth canada just fit the vibe so well, much better than constant summer socal idk. the look of the show definitely evolved but i dont remember too much of a change around that time... how would you describe it? i must be missing something Well I'm nearly certain there was at least a brief turn for the worse during the first part of season 4. Way more contrasty. I feel like the writing shifted then too a bit. Like they were trying something new and then realized their old formula was solid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikkor Posted February 10, 2016 Share Posted February 10, 2016 4 hours ago, mercer said: Digital really makes redheads look older. Yeah, it looks like as if she were 15years older with grey hair and bad color job. The camera is probably a sony, they should shoot with a canon c500. mercer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.