bluefonia Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Does anybody here have any experience with this zoo lens? Edit: hm, zoo lens, - zoom lens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy lee Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 yes it is very good , Its Zeiss and they dont make bad lenses , its modern C/Y Zeiss glass, tac sharp great blacks and contrast plus warm Zeiss look , in a one touch push pull lens without the 'tromboning' extenting push pull style it is VERY cinematic looking lens ...if you use it right - fully wide open , put it on a speedbooster and it becomes insane - its comparable to the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 just a stop slower at f4- so get it on a speedbooster and you have a fast great zoom - you need to rig it on rods with a lens support on the end to make it stable . AND...its cheap on ebay ...go buy! https://www.zeiss.com/content/dam/Photography/new/pdf/en/downloadcenter/contax_yashica/vario-sonnar4_80-200mm_e.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluefonia Posted February 26, 2016 Author Share Posted February 26, 2016 Well, Andy. - now you made me spend more money on glass :-). I already have a C/Y > MFT speedbooster to go with my Yashica ML collection and bought the Zeiss in C/Y mount on eBay 5 minutes ago. Excited to see the results from this lens, especially on the 150-200mm range. ...and sorry. I just realized I didn't posted this in the right forum. I thought I had written in Lens-forum. andy lee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy lee Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Use this in the long end of the lens and it looks very cinematic , get watching all those Tony Scott films for long lens framing ideas , Tony always used long lens to great effect in him films it became his trade mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluefonia Posted March 12, 2016 Author Share Posted March 12, 2016 This lens is fantastic. First impressions are in fact - despite the difference in focal length - that I like the results better than my Sigma 18-35 Art. The Zeiss is tac sharp in a very filmic way and the contrast and colors are awesome. So now I have gone for more Zeiss, as I just bought a Vari Sonar 28-70mm T* F3.5-4.5. Should arrive within a week, - I´m excited. Xavier Plagaro Mussard, andy lee, vaga and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy lee Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 yeepee welcome to the Zeiss Party - these lenses are amazing ! the 28-70mm T* F3.5-4.5 is very good it pops its so sharp !! and its small and light too great for outdoors all the Zeiss C/YPrimes are great too - same glass formulation as the Super Speeds and Ultra Prime Cine Lenses vaga and bluefonia 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluefonia Posted March 18, 2016 Author Share Posted March 18, 2016 The Zeiss Vari Sonar 28-70 arrived to day, Took it outside the house this afternoon for a short test-shooting. It seems to be every bit as awesome as the 80-200mm, so the two lenses seem - probably no surprise here - to be a perfect match. Now I just hope the footage from the two Zeiss and my Sigma 18-35 will intercut well, - that's the next test. Quote all the Zeiss C/YPrimes are great too - same glass formulation as the Super Speeds and Ultra Prime Cine Lenses I already have a complete set of Yashica primes. I'm sure they are not quite on par with the Zeiss primes, but for my needs I think I'm covered for a long time, as I also have seedboosters for both C/Y- and Canon mount. (My Sigma is Canon-mount) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpr Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 I have all the cy zooms, great glass. Have you tried the 100-300? Crazy sharp, probably too sharp for its own good.. 35-70 probably my favourite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaga Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 I was planning to buy the 80-200 too! Lots of god deals on Amazon. Can someone clear up a few doubts I had? I see that Contax has a Contax G line that has autofocus (I am assuming from pictures of the mount that the 80-200 doesn't have any pins to interface with the camera in the first place). Is there any smart Contax to Canon EF-S or Contax to Samsung NX adapter that can carry the autofocus signal to this lens? What other differences are there between the Contax C/Y mount and Contax G? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DayRaven Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 3 hours ago, vaga said: I was planning to buy the 80-200 too! Lots of god deals on Amazon. Can someone clear up a few doubts I had? I see that Contax has a Contax G line that has autofocus (I am assuming from pictures of the mount that the 80-200 doesn't have any pins to interface with the camera in the first place). Is there any smart Contax to Canon EF-S or Contax to Samsung NX adapter that can carry the autofocus signal to this lens? What other differences are there between the Contax C/Y mount and Contax G? Contax G are rangefinder lenses, - The N line has autofocus and are very rare, and reportedly not good and expensive to get working. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaga Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Is the Mount the same for all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DayRaven Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Just now, vaga said: Is the Mount the same for all? No, the G series use the Contax G mount, it's got a much smaller flange distance - similar to a Canon screw mount, and certainly a smaller diameter too. I would assume, but cannot say for sure, that they are completely different designs and unlikely to share the desirable characteristics of the C/Y Zeiss glass being discussed here. Not to say that they aren't lovely in of themselves, but not glass that would match. vaga 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy lee Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Contax n lenses are very very good , modern Zeiss designs aspheric elements absolutely razor sharp warm Zeiss colours and great blacks , you can use these on micro 4/3 with the right adaptor , I have a load of these lenses they pop off your screen they are that good . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 1 hour ago, andy lee said: Contax n lenses are very very good , modern Zeiss designs aspheric elements absolutely razor sharp warm Zeiss colours and great blacks , you can use these on micro 4/3 with the right adaptor , I have a load of these lenses they pop off your screen they are that good . I've heard these are difficult to adapt. Can you post a link to a suitable adapter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vaga Posted March 20, 2016 Share Posted March 20, 2016 Interesting, the N is designed for full frame but you're using it on an MFT system. Is it a pretty light lens? Seems like there should be a lot of glass, meaning the image formed should be quite bright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.