Super Members Mattias Burling Posted April 7, 2016 Super Members Share Posted April 7, 2016 Waking this thread since its the place we have talked the most about the D16 and I just thought this looked great. Bioskop.Inc and Ed_David 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Axel 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerbert Floor Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Perfect, both! Is that the new micro cam? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 1 minute ago, Gerbert Floor said: Perfect, both! Is that the new micro cam? 1dc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 The 1D C really has a lot of 'pizzazz'. Canons seem to work well with people. Not just that it works for the operator, but it's soft enough to be flattering for the talent in front as well as skintones just being lovely and warm. Canons render like a comfortable warm blanket and a Sony for example is like that wool sweater your grandma knitted for you and itches all over the place and you don't want to be seen wearing it either. Shane Hurlbut did a comparison between some cine primes very recently and noted how the Canon cine primes is really flattering on the face as well, making it look a bit slimmer and more youthful. I guess that's really where Canon shines. Not detailed landscapes, not for much really, but when it comes to people... it's just bloody second to none. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 18 minutes ago, Cinegain said: The 1D C really has a lot of 'pizzazz'. Canons seem to work well with people. Not just that it works for the operator, but it's soft enough to be flattering for the talent in front as well as skintones just being lovely and warm. Canons render like a comfortable warm blanket and a Sony for example is like that wool sweater your grandma knitted for you and itches all over the place and you don't want to be seen wearing it either. Shane Hurlbut did a comparison between some cine primes very recently and noted how the Canon cine primes is really flattering on the face as well, making it look a bit slimmer and more youthful. I guess that's really where Canon shines. Not detailed landscapes, not for much really, but when it comes to people... it's just bloody second to none. Interesting analogy, and I have to concur. I also love the way that Canons work with people also. I know those two videos were shot with CLog, and the 1DX Mk ii does not have CLog. I am hoping that the new camera will not lose any of the former's magic. There was recently a video on Vimeo that compared the 1DX Mkii with the 1DC... and when I say "compared", I mean they physically had both cameras for testing. They also mentioned concerns over the lack of CLog, so I wonder if Canon will seek to fix this omission? I'm sure it is something that could easily be added in the firmware. Or better yet, just add it to the production version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_David Posted April 17, 2016 Author Share Posted April 17, 2016 On 4/7/2016 at 11:14 AM, Mattias Burling said: Waking this thread since its the place we have talked the most about the D16 and I just thought this looked great. this is pretty damn amazing stuff. wow i need to rethink this camera. I just wish the thing wasn't 200 ASA. that makes it pretty difficult to use nowadays. Brings us back to lighting in the 90s. And a lot of things have smaller crews and move faster and have less bigger lights. Also the limited dynamic range. But still a really nice camera. Mattias Burling 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 5 hours ago, Ed_David said: this is pretty damn amazing stuff. wow i need to rethink this camera. I just wish the thing wasn't 200 ASA. that makes it pretty difficult to use nowadays. Brings us back to lighting in the 90s. And a lot of things have smaller crews and move faster and have less bigger lights. Also the limited dynamic range. But still a really nice camera. Fuzzy out of focus blown highlights is the look you're after? I must not get it, so I'll pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Kotlos Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 34 minutes ago, DBounce said: Fuzzy out of focus blown highlights is the look you're after? I must not get it, so I'll pass. Its all about the colors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 4 hours ago, Don Kotlos said: Its all about the colors. And the motion, and the tonality. Not a perfect video, but the hallmarks of the D16 image are unmistakable. Mattias Burling and kaylee 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jia Li Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 hi guys. that's my quick little travel piece about a train in yangon. yes, the d16 is not the perfect camera (and I didn't even update the firmware then) but, like many people, you use different cameras or techniques for different purposes. I'm still amazed this thing exists, it fits in a large pocket, and it's simply a joy to use. the post production is a bit of a hassle but the images are magic. so take what you will.. Blue Fox, tomastancredi, TheRenaissanceMan and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgharding Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 On 11/03/2016 at 2:42 AM, Adebowale said: Kind of fell in love with this guys BMPCC footage and just wanted to post one. I almost dont believe he shot it with the pocket Shooting in Iceland at sunset is officially cheating Zach Ashcraft, Blue Fox, Don Kotlos and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bioskop.Inc Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 2 hours ago, Jia Li said: hi guys. that's my quick little travel piece about a train in yangon. yes, the d16 is not the perfect camera (and I didn't even update the firmware then) but, like many people, you use different cameras or techniques for different purposes. I'm still amazed this thing exists, it fits in a large pocket, and it's simply a joy to use. the post production is a bit of a hassle but the images are magic. so take what you will.. Nice - do you have anymore footage from the D16 that you'd like to share? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jia Li Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 I haven't finished this cut, but here are some screens from a dance film I shot in a few months back which I test-graded. I tend to like the grain and flare. This was pre-firmware update. mostly shot on the cine nikkor 10mm and a small agne zoom. Hopefully I'll have some time to finish the edit soon... also attached is a screen of my setup. as you can see it's pretty minimal, basically nothing. the d16 with grip and cine nikkor 10mm. I attach a small sony shotgun to the top sometimes, and I have one of those rapid straps attached to the base so I can wear the camera if needed. The strap comes with a plate which has an extra screw mount I sometimes attach a monitor/magic arm to, but generally I shoot just by judging the exposure and focus from the (very bad) lcd screen. Bioskop.Inc, tomastancredi and Nikkor 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mat33 Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 Heres a few snapshots from the D16 Don Kotlos 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBounce Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 9 hours ago, mat33 said: Heres a few snapshots from the D16 The D16 look it very subjective. For me this is just too vintage looking for my style, but I think I can understand the appeal. I would be curious if the D16 footage can look modern also? For sure it is an interesting camera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Members Mattias Burling Posted April 22, 2016 Super Members Share Posted April 22, 2016 10 minutes ago, DBounce said: The D16 look it very subjective. For me this is just too vintage looking for my style, but I think I can understand the appeal. I would be curious if the D16 footage can look modern also? For sure it is an interesting camera. I think this is modern and clean with just gorgeous skin tones. Its also fun that its shot with their affordable Kish lenses the Elite $$$$ Primes. At least I cant really tell which is which. "The Dancer and the D16 was shot on 3 cameras, one D16 with PL mount and Elite PL primes and two D16's with C-mounts and Kish cinema primes." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil A Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 21 minutes ago, DBounce said: The D16 look it very subjective. For me this is just too vintage looking for my style, but I think I can understand the appeal. I would be curious if the D16 footage can look modern also? For sure it is an interesting camera. This is an issue I have with most footage shot with the D16 but as well with the BMPCC. It's intentionally vintage or low budgety looking or flawed or however you want to name it. The video of the dancer that Mattias just posted is rather detailed while a subjectively felt 98% of clips I've seen from these cameras is really fuzzy and not sharp/detailed looking. If you consider how many movies have been shot with 2-3k cameras but have great clarity and detail, where's the gap? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Kotlos Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 58 minutes ago, Phil A said: This is an issue I have with most footage shot with the D16 but as well with the BMPCC. It's intentionally vintage or low budgety looking or flawed or however you want to name it. The video of the dancer that Mattias just posted is rather detailed while a subjectively felt 98% of clips I've seen from these cameras is really fuzzy and not sharp/detailed looking. If you consider how many movies have been shot with 2-3k cameras but have great clarity and detail, where's the gap? A big part of the look depends on the lenses and their coatings. With D16 it is highly more likely to find footage with vintage s16 lenses that have this distinct look. Then there is also the sensor that is slightly more bloomy and that appears more with very bright scenes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 I think part of it is crummy lenses and part of it is people specifically grading for a low-fi look. There's plenty of sharp, finished-looking footage available if you look around, and it's absolutely beautiful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.