timmyturntable Posted March 9, 2016 Author Share Posted March 9, 2016 I've got a hold of the Sigma 18-35mm for the next few weeks for some shooting on vacation. I will post a video once I get back. Sounds like some of the vintage lenses might take the edge off the clinical look...going to try that next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 On March 5, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Geoff CB said: I have the voightlander 28, 40, and 90mm. They along with the nikon Ai-S are great on the NX1. For me though the S lenses are fantastic, very sharp, great look, amazing AF, and stabilized. Both are going for under a grand on the used market right now. Interested in picking up the voigtlander 40 to use as a standard walk around lens. How do you like the look on the nx1 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountneerMan Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 On 3/5/2016 at 2:08 PM, Marco Tecno said: Top 3 for bokeh on NX1 (native lenses) is, IMO: 85/1.4 50-150 45/1.8 After that I'd say 50-200 and 60mm macro. Only after those, there comes the 16-50s Top 3 for AF: 50-150 45 16-50s Top 3 for sharpness: 60 macro 50-150 30mm I only have the 16-50 f/2-2.8 50-150 f/2.8 and 50-200 f/3.5-5.6 and in my opinion out of those three lens I would orer them like this BOKEH & SHAPRNESS: 50-150 16-50 50-200 The 16-50 is definately alot sharper and has alot more bokeh than the 50-200(IMO). But I definately agree the 50-150 is better then the other two across the board except for weight and for that reason I hardly ever bring it climbing. That is why I bought the 50-200 in the first place. On 3/5/2016 at 8:18 AM, woozie said: Is the NX 50-200mm as good as the movie pro 18-200mm lens, for video? I have never used the 18-200 but from what I understand it is far inferior to the 50-200. I have heard It is quite soft, significantly slower at all focal lengths, costs almost 3 times as much and weights quite a bit more. If you are considering this lens compare getting the 50-200 with either the 16-50PZ or a few primes like the 10mm, 30mm f/2 or 45mm. I think you will end up with better performing lense for less money and will weight less in your bag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 7 hours ago, kidzrevil said: Interested in picking up the voigtlander 40 to use as a standard walk around lens. How do you like the look on the nx1 ? It's my favorite lens ever made. Will post sample for you later today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdiamond Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 Any suggestions on a good lens with a low f-stop and fairly short focal length. I run a YouTube channel and do most of my filming in a small enclosed area. I've only been using the 16-50s lens b/c I haven't found anything that's been able to surpass it (played with a Rokinon 35mm 1.4 but didn't get much out of it). I'd prefer a lens that allows for AF, so I've been eyeing the 45mm 1.8 and 85mm 1.4, but not sure those would be ideal for my limited space. Any other suggestions that might not break the bank? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 1 hour ago, bdiamond said: Any suggestions on a good lens with a low f-stop and fairly short focal length. I run a YouTube channel and do most of my filming in a small enclosed area. I've only been using the 16-50s lens b/c I haven't found anything that's been able to surpass it (played with a Rokinon 35mm 1.4 but didn't get much out of it). I'd prefer a lens that allows for AF, so I've been eyeing the 45mm 1.8 and 85mm 1.4, but not sure those would be ideal for my limited space. Any other suggestions that might not break the bank? The 30mm f2 is actually very good. However it's AF is sub par. If you can make it work for the space, the 45mm is the way to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted March 10, 2016 Share Posted March 10, 2016 3 hours ago, Geoff CB said: It's my favorite lens ever made. Will post sample for you later today. Nice ! Shot with its once and loved the red ring flare you get shooting wide open. Had to send it back cuz the canon mount aint have aperture control Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPStewart Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 8 hours ago, Geoff CB said: It's my favorite lens ever made. Will post sample for you later today. Yeah - I'd dig seeing some of this lens too. I have the 20mm and it's a very good lens - but it's not an "outstanding" lens. Almost no 20mm lenses are really...optical thing I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 Threw this together this morning. Settings in description. Cinegain, kidzrevil, Mars and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 35 minutes ago, Geoff CB said: Threw this together this morning. Settings in description. Gonna take a look ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mars Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 17 hours ago, DPStewart said: I have the 20mm and it's a very good lens - but it's not an "outstanding" lens. Almost no 20mm lenses are really...optical thing I guess. I can recommend this one, especially in front of an APS-C sensor:https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-20mm-f1-8g-ed/4 Not too heavy, suficiently sharp, around 600 bucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 4 hours ago, Geoff CB said: [..] Threw this together this morning. Settings in description. Dang, that detail in the foliage around 00:07. You see every individual twig and leaf about crystal clear. And the fibers from that sweater. That's some resolving combo. Geoff CB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 Seriously...dammit, dude. Now I've got to spend money on another lens I don't need. THANKS A LOT. :P Has anyone used the Voigtlander 75mm 2.5 or 58mm 1.4? Do they resolve this well too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 59 minutes ago, TheRenaissanceMan said: Seriously...dammit, dude. Now I've got to spend money on another lens I don't need. THANKS A LOT. :P Has anyone used the Voigtlander 75mm 2.5 or 58mm 1.4? Do they resolve this well too? I don't have the 75, but I do have the 58mm 1.4 and 90mm f3.5 TheRenaissanceMan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRenaissanceMan Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 8 minutes ago, Geoff CB said: I don't have the 75, but I do have the 58mm 1.4 and 90mm f3.5 Thanks, Geoff! Resolving power looks great on both lenses, although I'm not crazy about the 58's bokeh. Little harsh for my taste. Still, the 20, 40, and 90 are looking like awesome options. All manual, Nikon mount, and they can resolve the NX1 sensor wide open? That's good enough for anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 7 hours ago, Geoff CB said: Threw this together this morning. Settings in description. Very sharp ! i like it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff CB Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 1 hour ago, TheRenaissanceMan said: Thanks, Geoff! Resolving power looks great on both lenses, although I'm not crazy about the 58's bokeh. Little harsh for my taste. Still, the 20, 40, and 90 are looking like awesome options. All manual, Nikon mount, and they can resolve the NX1 sensor wide open? That's good enough for anything. Yeah I agree, I have the 28, 40, and 90 and they all match in terms of look. Thought the 58 1.4 would be great, but aside from it's aperture it does not match the other lenses, and stopped down it reads as too sharp compared to the others, I like it for photos on my Nikon camera, don't enjoy using it as much on the NX1. Still need that 20mm to complete the set. TheRenaissanceMan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 1 hour ago, Geoff CB said: Yeah I agree, I have the 28, 40, and 90 and they all match in terms of look. Thought the 58 1.4 would be great, but aside from it's aperture it does not match the other lenses, and stopped down it reads as too sharp compared to the others, I like it for photos on my Nikon camera, don't enjoy using it as much on the NX1. Still need that 20mm to complete the set. Voigtlander makes some damn good lensss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.