Sony a6300 vs Panasonic gh4

[tdonovic]

34 minutes ago, elgabogomez said:

I could be wrong but as i recall, the af100 had a base iso of 500 or so, and I used it at 1600 or 1200, and the footage was fine. The camera belonged to the film school I was in and was used for all academic events and cultural events of the city... Some of the footage went to local tv. The few times I used it, it didn't won me over and I liked the gh2 image better. I was giving Panasonic the same treatment as Sony to be less of a fan boy (the fs100 can easily be used at 8000 iso) and to make the point that for "events" I would use "video cameras" for its long battery and recording times, xlrs... That might be the Achilles heel of cheap mirror less cameras, the event recording, for everything else, they are my first choice for its adaptability, size, weight, lens options, etc.

AF100 is also a good bet because of relay recording and built in NDs, both things you miss out on in milcs. Its a bit old, but if you need a proper video camera you can rely on and has all the trimmings, it is all you can get with a m/43 mount. Im just waiting for a cheap used one