kidzrevil Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Got this in the email today from FILMCONVERT :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrorSvensson Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 wow almost 400 votes for the nx1 kidzrevil and Marco Tecno 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted May 17, 2016 Author Share Posted May 17, 2016 @BrorSvensson ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NX1user Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 How much work goes into them creating a camera profile? Any idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted May 17, 2016 Author Share Posted May 17, 2016 1 hour ago, NX1user said: How much work goes into them creating a camera profile? Any idea? Alot I suppose. I always got the most accurate color from them. Using other LUT's made it very difficult to get color that looked "natural" which sucked when shooting lookbooks and products. Filmconvert will be a great addition to the NX1 which already has some of the best color rendering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronL Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 1 hour ago, kidzrevil said: Alot I suppose. I always got the most accurate color from them. Using other LUT's made it very difficult to get color that looked "natural" which sucked when shooting lookbooks and products. Filmconvert will be a great addition to the NX1 which already has some of the best color rendering But is it still basically a form of LUT they are using, or is there some other processing happening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted May 17, 2016 Author Share Posted May 17, 2016 Filmconvert.com , they can explain it better than i can i guess @aaronl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Andrew Reid Posted May 17, 2016 Administrators Share Posted May 17, 2016 What's in the 'other'? Seems a big piece of the pie to be all mysterious about MountneerMan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountneerMan Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 38 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said: What's in the 'other'? Seems a big piece of the pie to be all mysterious about What other? ohhhhh that 34%.... yea just ignore that its not important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted May 18, 2016 Author Share Posted May 18, 2016 lol ! The "other" chart will forever remain an unsolved mystery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisaha Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 All the rest of the cameras that are not in their profiles, and they are not named "BlackMagic Design Ursa mini 4.6K - Samsung NX1 - Sony a6300 - Apple iPhone 6/6 Plus - Sony FS7 Slog3 - Canon C300II" and have less of 6% of the votes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turboguard Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 I use a light meter and still NEVER can use their profile for the BMPCC. IF I use film convert I ALWAYS have to tweak the white balance and exposure... Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted May 19, 2016 Author Share Posted May 19, 2016 damn that sucks dude ! I have never shot with the bmpcc so I can't comment on that. Do you have to make dramatic tweaks to white balance and exposure ? I usually have to make tweaks as well but that goes the same for any LUT I use @Turboguard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turboguard Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 Maybe this is a bad example but I have premiere open working on this right now (I shot this movie WITHOUT IR/UV cut so yes it does have pollution but look at that extreme difference). First is BMPCC RAW Second is Filmconvert with BMPCC profile and initial settings Third is RAW with 200% saturation Maybe I'm wrong, is that what the profile is supposed to look like? I have a DaVinci graded one on IG; https://www.instagram.com/engdahlcinema/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted May 19, 2016 Author Share Posted May 19, 2016 Yeah bro lol thats how its supposed to look ! You can adjust the intensity of color and contrast with the plugin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turboguard Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 2 minutes ago, kidzrevil said: Yeah bro lol thats how its supposed to look ! You can adjust the intensity of color and contrast with the plugin I guess, I just don't like the look then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted May 19, 2016 Author Share Posted May 19, 2016 not trying to throw shade at your grading cause both the processed shots look amazing but I prefer the second one, the colors look so rich. You said that's what you weren't going for but damn its a nice image lol @Turboguard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turboguard Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 1 hour ago, kidzrevil said: not trying to throw shade at your grading cause both the processed shots look amazing but I prefer the second one, the colors look so rich. You said that's what you weren't going for but damn its a nice image lol @Turboguard Don't worry, didn't read it as shade. Just each and every image I've tried it with looks too saturated, too discolored and contrast is usually way too high. But you did made me realize that maybe it's just to my disliking, more a personal opinion than anything. Now I know! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axel Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 I second kidzrevil. Shows perfectly the BMPCC's excellent colors. Because all three images are good, the first one, rather flat, looks cold and misty and could work as well to transport that mood. I had the FC trial once but didn't buy it. Yes, I see the idea behind it, but there's nothing that can't be accomplished manually within, say, Resolve. But that's just me, and I don't want to argue. kidzrevil 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidzrevil Posted May 19, 2016 Author Share Posted May 19, 2016 @Axel well said, its amazing to me how flexible the image from the bmpcc is in general. It gives off a different mood in all 3 shots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now