John Matthews Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 Not that it's important or that anyone's counting, but this thread has just passed the threshold of becoming the most popular thread on EOSHD in terms of posts (over 1400) and views (over 142,000 and climbing) just overtaking the previous top dog "Surprise! Sony Alpha A6000 video mode huge improvement." jase, Dean and Cinegain 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesku Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 I wonder if there is difference in "4k Photo" video quality vs normal 4k video. I figured that also in normal 4k video mode there is an option to use "4k photo creative video mode". (in GH4 but I think the GX85 has the same 4k photo features) Does anyone know what is the difference between 4k video and 4k photo? The camera says: "Change the video quality settings used for 4k still images?" when selecting "4k photo creative video mode" feature in normal video mode. How the video stream is different for photos and video? NR, autofocusing... ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Matthews Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 17 minutes ago, Vesku said: Does anyone know what is the difference between 4k video and 4k photo? Limitations: 0-255, only a 30p (29.97p) option, perhaps more moiré IMO Benefits: multiple aspect ratios (1:1 has 2880 vertical lines!), more creative options perhaps. jase and Cary Knoop 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesku Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 4k photo has different NR than normal video. At least in my GH4. 4k photo has less NR in high iso which may be good if using post NR. The noise is not "ruined" with less sophisticated camera NR. Cary Knoop 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgreszcz Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 Can anyone recommend which Filmconvert profiles they use for the GX80? I'm primarily interested in using Film convert to match the Panasonic with my iphone and I'm using Natural 0, -5, -5, -2 White Balance A:2 G:2 for my picture profile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPC Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 71 pages. Can anyone point to anything looking like a finished film made with the GX80 / 85? I don't remember seeing anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinegain Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 Albert ( @Brother ) traded in the G7 for the GX80! Of course he had to go and get one of the sickest lenses out there for it. Adept, mechanicalEYE, Goose and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Gabriel Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 Has anyone done a good comparison between the gx85 and g85? I want to get one, and I'm not sure if the g85 is worth the cost. The only real benefits I see to the g85 is the weather sealing and cinelike D. However I'm not sure if cinelike D really gets me that much more than -5 contrast on Natural. I'm not even sure how much I need the extra dynamic range, I've been shooting on the gh3 for the past few years and the Natural profile typically works fine for me. Opinions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesku Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 Nathan, if you want good dynamic range, get a used GH4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangenz Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 2 hours ago, Nathan Gabriel said: Has anyone done a good comparison between the gx85 and g85? I want to get one, and I'm not sure if the g85 is worth the cost. The only real benefits I see to the g85 is the weather sealing and cinelike D. However I'm not sure if cinelike D really gets me that much more than -5 contrast on Natural. I'm not even sure how much I need the extra dynamic range, I've been shooting on the gh3 for the past few years and the Natural profile typically works fine for me. Opinions? and external mic input if you like putting a fluffy shotty on the top. Shot this on GX85, 25mm 1.4, and 42.5 1.7 Fredrik Lyhne 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesku Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 3 minutes ago, Orangenz said: and external mic input if you like putting a fluffy shotty on the top. Shot this on GX85, 25mm 1.4, and 42.5 1.7 Looks like cineD. Horrible orange skin tones. Highlights and colors are clipping badly. Is the G85 dyn range so bad?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 11 hours ago, Cinegain said: Albert ( @Brother ) traded in the G7 for the GX80! Of course he had to go and get one of the sickest lenses out there for it. really impressive stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 11 hours ago, Cinegain said: Albert ( @Brother ) traded in the G7 for the GX80! Of course he had to go and get one of the sickest lenses out there for it. Indeed i did! I thought that the GX80 would make a perfect B-cam for the GH5. But who knows, the GH5 might be the worst camera ever, in that case i'll keep my GX80 and be happy with it Oh, the Olympus 25/1.2 is amazing by the way! 22 minutes ago, Goose said: really impressive stuff Thank you! Adept, Cinegain and John Matthews 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jase Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 On 16.12.2016 at 11:59 AM, Fredrik Lyhne said: Cool! Can you post a picture of the setup? Excited to hear your thoughts on image quality compared to your other lenses. Here you go: Excuse the bad quality, but my phone is the only other camera I have I also took your recommendation for the Smallrig Grip - awesome stuff! Yet i am thinking about whether I should add a metalwire or sth like that to the grip and the camera straps, just in case the pressure on the hotshoe is too big... For now it feels pretty rock solid, but I dont know whether I dare to trust this in the long run. During christmas I will make a small example video. Up until now I am just running around here at home and loving the lowlight as well as the focus ring, feels like Voigtländer! I think this GX80+ SB XL + Sigma 18-35 combo is kind of unmatched, there isnt another stabilized system out there that gives me the DOF of f2.2 (FF equiv) with such a wide angle zoom. Loving it! Now if the GX80 would have a mic in an 4k60p I probably would ban myself from this forum to not get caught by the GAS again. Have to admit, this camera is really nailing it for me. Paired with the Pana 20mm, I have a very stealthy kit when I need it, with the Sigma I am now ready for my next backpacking trip. John Matthews and Fredrik Lyhne 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 One more: mercer and Cinegain 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolf33d Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 I am getting a GX85 because the GH5 arrives in march and I go to Patagonia in February.. For those who have info or tried, does the Dual IS vs just the IBIS make a big difference in video? I would like a Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8 or the Oly 12-40mm f2.8 which is better but with no IS (therefore no Dual IS possible with the GX85). For video, is Dual IS clearly better than using the IBIS + let's say the 12-40mm Olympus? If dual IS makes a big difference, my combo will be the 12-35mm f/2.8 + maybe the 42.5mm f/1.2 IS Thanks Orangenz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cary Knoop Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 6 minutes ago, wolf33d said: I am getting a GX85 because the GH5 arrives in march and I go to Patagonia in February.. For those who have info or tried, does the Dual IS vs just the IBIS make a big difference in video? I would like a Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8 or the Oly 12-40mm f2.8 which is better but with no IS (therefore no Dual IS possible with the GX85). For video, is Dual IS clearly better than using the IBIS + let's say the 12-40mm Olympus? If dual IS makes a big difference, my combo will be the 12-35mm f/2.8 + maybe the 42.5mm f/1.2 IS It is hard to qualify objectively what is "big" in this case. I think IBIS is great even with lenses that do not have IS. Another great lens is the Panasonic 42.5mm f/1.7, that one works great in conjunction with IBIS. Orangenz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vulgatron Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 29 minutes ago, wolf33d said: I am getting a GX85 because the GH5 arrives in march and I go to Patagonia in February.. For those who have info or tried, does the Dual IS vs just the IBIS make a big difference in video? I would like a Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8 or the Oly 12-40mm f2.8 which is better but with no IS (therefore no Dual IS possible with the GX85). For video, is Dual IS clearly better than using the IBIS + let's say the 12-40mm Olympus? If dual IS makes a big difference, my combo will be the 12-35mm f/2.8 + maybe the 42.5mm f/1.2 IS Thanks I have the same question, actually even opened a thread asking that. I have a G80 and a Gx80 and now I have to decide between the Oly and the Pana, the Oly has a slight advantage due to the extra range and closer focus but if the Dual IS really makes a difference I would choose the 12-35. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cary Knoop Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 San Francisco at Night with lots of bokeh balls. Camera: Panasonic GX85 Lens: Sigma 50-100mm f/1.8 Metabones Speedbooster Most scenes recorded with an aperture of f/1.3 using ISO 1000. John Matthews 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolf33d Posted December 18, 2016 Share Posted December 18, 2016 53 minutes ago, Cary Knoop said: It is hard to qualify objectively what is "big" in this case. I think IBIS is great even with lenses that do not have IS. Another great lens is the Panasonic 42.5mm f/1.7, that one works great in conjunction with IBIS. Thanks. I have looked and will get the 1.7 over the 1.2, such a good deal for the price for the 12-35 vs the Oly I don't know though.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.